Slashdot Mirror


Local Police Want To Jam Wireless Signals

The Washington Post is reporting on the growing pressure from state and local law enforcement agencies for permission to jam wireless signals the way the Secret Service and the FBI can. Officials especially want to be able to drop a no-call blanket over local prisons around the country from time to time. "...jamming remains strictly illegal for state and local agencies. Federal officials barely acknowledge that they use it inside the United States, and the few federal agencies that can jam signals usually must seek a legal waiver first. The quest to expand the technology has invigorated a debate about how widely jamming should be allowed and whether its value as a common crime-fighting strategy outweighs its downsides, including restricting the constant access to the airwaves that Americans have come to expect. ... Critics warn of another potential problem, 'friendly fire,' when one agency inadvertently jams another's access to the airwaves, posing a safety hazard in an emergency. [CTIA spokesman Joe] Farren said there are 'smarter, better and safer alternatives,' such as stopping inmates from getting smuggled cellphones in the first place or pinpointing signals from unauthorized callers."

8 of 317 comments (clear)

  1. ....How about no? by SolidAltar · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How can a local entity possibly have the technical expertise and know how to operate any kind of jamming equipment safely? There's a reason they are illegal for the public and even rarely used in the fed government: They are freaking dangerous and jarring to law-abiding citizens.

    Am I wrong?

  2. Suure... by darkitecture · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The dumb public will be just fine with it riiight up until the first lawsuit from some person who's relative died because they couldn't dial 911.

    1. Re:Suure... by supernova_hq · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Ok, I'm actually destroying previous mods to post this, but I think your comment warrants it.

      Jamming (any type, really), is a very inexact practice. It is almost impossible to effectively jam a single area without affecting the surrounding area. Contrary to popular belief, prisons are not all situated in the middle of a desert (though they probably should be). Many of them are quite close to towns, parks, camp sites,etc. I have personally been on group camping trips (200+ people) within 3 blocks of a prison. If someone had a emergency while driving past the prison on their way to the camp, they would not be able to call 911.

      I just want to make sure that you understand that jamming a prison, and only that prison is actually a lot harder than you may think.

  3. No more uploading those police butality photos by Culture20 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    With this the police can seize cell phones with evidence before the data is uploaded?

  4. Can you blame them? by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Seriously, it's for the the public good. You don't want people to be able to upload the videos before their phones are stolen...

  5. Re:This will come up by thesupraman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It is simple to set up a cell inside a prison that cellphones will connect to, which will then ID all calls, the details of the phone, and with a little RDF even its approximate location.

    So it would be quite simple to clear dis-allowed cellphones from inside a prison, of course they dont - this should give you some idea of the scale of the problems in the prison system.

    Why not make it the law that all non-registered cellphones using the prinsons cell site coverage are automatically logged (phone details AND voice recorded..) - surely that would make the value of the phones almost nothing.

    Of course again, there goes a big source of lets call it 'power' from the bad prison associates, so it will not happen.

    Its not just the men locking doors and doing searches who can be corrupt, in fact I would suggest its not even mainly them..

  6. Re:This will come up by Schemat1c · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Just because something doesn't work all the time for all the people doesn't mean it isn't worth the investment or that it should be dismissed outright. The fact is that while the law enforcement/prison system may not be perfect, it is preventing some people from committing additional unlawful acts. When you're talking about crimes such as theft, rape, murder, etc., that is a significant and worthy cause.

    The prison system is a complete failure. The guards make insane amounts of money as do the companies that get contracted to perform services such as food and laundry. This leads to corruption on many levels all the way up to the lawmakers who pass ridiculous laws in order to keep the prisons full. The prison guards have a very powerful lobby in CA that was instrumental in stopping Proposition 5 which would have reduced prison populations dramatically and saved billions in tax dollars.

    There is nothing worthy about this system. The majority of prisoners are non-violent offenders, mostly drug offenses that should be treated as a medical issue rather than a criminal one. A simple Google search will give you all the information you need to know about Prison Inc.

    --

    "Nobody knows the age of the human race, but everybody agrees that it is old enough to know better." - Unknown
  7. Re:This will come up by amRadioHed · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The accessibility of drugs and other contraband in jail kind of shines a spotlight on the stupidity of the war on drugs. I mean if the government can't even come close to keeping drugs out of a place where people have no freedom at all, why do they think they can do it in a supposedly free country?

    --
    We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace