Slashdot Mirror


Comcast Apologizes For Super Bowl Porn Glitch

DrinkDr.Pepper writes "Just after the last touchdown by the Cardinals, with 3 minutes to go in the game, approximately 30 seconds of pornographic material was shown, seen by an unknown number of Comcast customers in Tucson, Arizona who were watching the game in standard definition. Comcast has apologized (they used the word 'mortified') and is issuing a $10 credit to any customer who claims to have been impacted. Various news accounts suggest that the incident was a malicious act, but no one knows how it was done or by whom."

16 of 526 comments (clear)

  1. Is there a difference? by AKAImBatman · · Score: 4, Interesting

    With the Superbowl commercials being what they were this year, I'm surprised anyone noticed the difference. GoDaddy in particular is getting out of hand, though I was not impressed by the Doritos or NBC commercials either. (At least the Conan commercial was just amusing innuendo.) All around, it was a rather embarrassing year to be watching the Superbowl with the family.

    1. Re:Is there a difference? by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I would like to point out that it used to be standard for a 20-year-old to marry a 12-14-year-old and start having sex, and she'd have a baby a year or so in. We teach our kids about sex in school, at 9; they have to wait 9 more years before they're "ready for" actual pictures of it, according to the law. In Nevada you can have sex with a 14 year old if you're 35, but you go to jail if you show her a picture of your penis.

      There's knee-jerk reactions in both directions here, both on the fundamental "SHIELD ANYONE UNDER 90 FROM PORNOGRAPHY" (yes we have people trying to BAN ALL PORN and all possession of porn) level and on the "in nature you'd see naked people all the time, we invented clothes to deal with the cold and used to have sex in community caves" level. Be mindful of the arguments and of the realities when you're engaged in these discussions.

    2. Re:Is there a difference? by electrons_are_brave · · Score: 4, Interesting

      There's a difference between sex and porn, though. Sure children shouldn't be taught that sex is somehow wrong or taboo. But the way sex is presented in a lot of porn pandering to male adolescent fantasies that have nothing to do with sex with a real live woman. I have nothing against porn, but children don't need to see women moaning with pleasure when nothing particularly pleasurable is happening to them - it wrong information that leads to urealistic expectations.

    3. Re:Is there a difference? by electrons_are_brave · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Agreed, and what I said wasn't meant to extend to some prudish, Victorian attitude about sex. And I have nothing against porn being made that shows women as playthings for men - any man who doesn't know the difference between how women act in the fantasy porno world and how real women respond sexually is ... well limited. But children don't know this - they see is what they see - they have no context to put it in. Besides that, I would have thought that the reason adults wouldn't want to see porn in front of children is simply beacuse it is pornographic - it's meant to arouse or at least titillate. Surely this introduces a certain awkwardness to the family lunch? Recognising that sex is essentially private act and not wanting it to be commodified to sell whatever isn't the same as prudishness.

  2. Irony... by MojoRilla · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Several years ago when my home team was in the Superbowl, my comcast cable went out for several hours during the game. Their response was tough luck. They weren't willing to give me any credit. So it is pretty ironic that people "exposed" to 30 seconds of porn are getting $10 back. The moral of the story is that corporations are only responsible when the news media shames them.

  3. It's a broadcast. It may invoke revenue clauses. by fishbowl · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Laugh about the porn clip (I did, here in Tucson, I yelled "FTW!")

    But depending on the origin of the video, Comcast may be on a very real hook for broadcasting copyrighted material without license, and could conceivably be exposed to distribution royalties for a much larger audience than the one that is supposed to be limited to a specific, accountable pay-per-view arrangement.

    I would be very surprised if lawyers were not working this out in a damage control mode.

    --
    -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  4. Malicious or ignorant? by daveywest · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I work for a CATV operator, and my desk is 200 feet from the headend. There is no way that could have been a glitch. The real question is was it a malicious or ignorant act of an employee. Regardless, the unemployment rate just went up in Tucson.

    1. Re:Malicious or ignorant? by flynt · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hey, since yours is the only comment modded 4 or higher with any technical knowledge, I have a question for you. We got my mom an HDTV a couple years ago, and she was only paying for basic cable, no digital boxes in the house at all. When we set it up, I did a "channel scan" and the TV picked up some HD channels with numbers like 121.1 (as an example). Many of these were just the big networks HD feeds, like ABC, CBS, etc. But there was a block of channels even higher up that were HD movies. And we'd be watching them, and then all of a sudden they'd flip to a different movie, or rewind itself and play again. I guess we were 'intercepting' some neighbors' on-demand movies. Could this be what happened in AZ during the superbowl? For all I know, that's what you just described, so pardon my ignorance.

  5. Re:isn't this going to get them fined? by furby076 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    They claimed to have been hacked. As long as the investigation supports being hacked then no they will not get fined. The FCC is not some ridiculous organization that goes on witch-hunts. Even if it was not a hacker - it was a technical foul-up, not an intended viewing. The FCC are smart enough to realize that computers have glitches and shit happens.

    I could see someone sueing them under the pretense "my baby got scarred from this".

    --

    I do not support "The Man". I also do not support your irrational stupidity
  6. This has happened before with Comcast by Cowmonaut · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This has happened before. But it affected Cartoon Network at 3:00 PM for like two minutes in Vancouver WA. I was like 14 at the time and thought it awesome.

  7. comcastsuperbowlporn.com traffic by jabberwock · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I emailed the guy who grabbed the domain and posted the video. Traffic: 178,000-plus the first day.

    http://www.intotemptation.net/2009/02/03/super-bowl-porn-postmortem/

    Unfortunately for him ... he had no plan to monetize the traffic at all.

    How fast do you think traffic will drop off? My guess is ... down 80 percent in 30 days ...

  8. Re:I think by Lord+Ender · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Our brains are hard-wired for taboos because they helped primitive societies avoid disasters.

    There is a lot of "noise" in the taboo "signal", for example: taboo words. But some taboos (against incest, or eating certain things) were socially useful. Even the common taboo against homosexual sex could have been beneficial to primitive societies because such practices were significantly more likely to spread disease through the population. Obviously, modern medicine makes this a non-issue, today.

    I would say it is unrealistic to expect a society to have no useless taboos, because they are physically part of our brains. But if we stop using government to enforce useless taboos, we will have advanced.

    --
    A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
  9. Re:I think by duckInferno · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The homosexual taboo is a relatively recent development. Many ancient cultures practiced it openly and it was often seen to be as perfectly normal as a relationship between a man and a woman.

    --
    Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, watch it -- I'm huge!
  10. Re:Other TV hacks by ajayrockrock · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What about Spaghetti Cat? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oMyHuCVaRaE

  11. A view from Europe by Don_dumb · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It would be massively more exciting if they didn't keep throwing adverts and extended half time breaks in. It's a great way to lose the tension and the moment - several minutes of drinks adverts.

    PS - if you need Cheerleaders, you don't have an atmosphere.

    --
    If this were really happening, what would you think?
  12. Injecting signals into cable TV by Skapare · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Although the tap to each home attenuates the signal quite a bit, it is possible for people to inject signals into the cable system. It won't go beyond the first amplifier unless its frequency is in the uplink band and that signal won't be redistributed. But it does mean people can distribute weak signals around their neighborhood. On frequencies the cable company isn't using, it won't take a lot of signal to communicate with your neighbors. For example you could run your own neighborhood LAN over the cable wires.

    It would take a LOT of signal power to take over an existing signal. You'd have to boost it as much as the attenuator tap reduces it, plus the additional amount to take over the signal on that channel. But it would be possible. So what I'm curious about is just how widespread this porn was seen in Tuscon.

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars