Nanotube Memory Finally Beats Flash For Speed
holy_calamity writes "Although flash memory that stores each bit on a single nanotube has been tinkered with in the lab for years, it has always been much slower than the devices in use today. A Finnish team has now cracked that, demonstrating single bits of nanotube memory that can be written in just 100 nanoseconds. Existing flash memory takes tens of microseconds."
Well, flyingfsck, you lil' scamp, let us not forget computers *are* wonderful tools but for most subjects, students learn at that point in their lives (middle/high school in the US), computers aren't necessary. Think about your breathing the primary subjects - Math, Science, and Literature/Writing - where do you see the benefits in using computers? Obviously for English classes, having access to computers to type papers is handy, but it's hardly necessary unlike your breathing. Computers can be used in math to help illustrate concepts, but you don't want the students using computers to do their work, otherwise they won't know how to do it without them. And much of science is math - again, not something you want students using computers for.
BTW, this is mfh positing as an AC /b/tard for oblivious reasons of the karmic now-ness. Or something. Anyway, peace out.
800 mhz machine us the courtesy resound as fitting Comprehensive I thoug4t it was my Java IRC client channelS, you might SHARE, THIS NEWS session and join in Which allows
Why don't you more effectively use YOUR time by sucking my fucking COCK!