Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Nanotube Memory Finally Beats Flash For Speed

Posted by ScuttleMonkey on from the more-nano-for-your-nano dept.

holy_calamity writes "Although flash memory that stores each bit on a single nanotube has been tinkered with in the lab for years, it has always been much slower than the devices in use today. A Finnish team has now cracked that, demonstrating single bits of nanotube memory that can be written in just 100 nanoseconds. Existing flash memory takes tens of microseconds."

3 of 86 comments (clear)

  1. Wow, that's pretty cool by Yvan256 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Call me back when it's available at Costco for 100$ per Terabyte.

  2. Re:nano internet? by jd · · Score: 5, Funny

    No, it would be 10^-9 LoCs. You're thinking of deci-internets.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  3. Re:Low OPs lifetime by marcansoft · · Score: 5, Informative

    Your average Flash chip does 100k erase/write cycles. 18k is certainly reasonable for new tech, which will certainly improve over time. The number refers to the number of operations per erasable block (or it will in the future), so in practice you get a much larger number of total I/O operations on the entire chip, given a reasonable wear leveling algorithm.