Slashdot Mirror


Vim 7.2 Released

sanguisdex writes "After fifteen months of work: a brand new Vim release! This is a stable version. There are many bug fixes and updated runtime files. The only new feature worth mentioning is support for floating point. Upgrading from a previous version is highly recommended: a few crashing bugs and several security issues were fixed. For the details see the announcement or go directly to the download page."

15 of 106 comments (clear)

  1. in addition to the new release... by yagu · · Score: 4, Informative

    O'Reilly released the latest new version of their vi book, (now "Learning the vi and Vim Editors") last summer with seven new chapters devoted to vim!

  2. Vi has two modes ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    beep constantly, and break everything

  3. Am I crazy? by liebeskind · · Score: 5, Informative

    Am I crazy - or has vim 7.2 been out for a while?
    The date on the announcement is from August 8, 2009.
    Also:
    ~$ vim --version
    VIM - Vi IMproved 7.2 (2008 Aug 9, compiled Nov 11 2008 17:20:43)

    1. Re:Am I crazy? by gardyloo · · Score: 5, Funny

      The date on the announcement is from August 8, 2009.

            Eek! The Large Hadron Collider's effects have started leaking to other slashdot dimensions!

    2. Re:Am I crazy? by SpaceLifeForm · · Score: 4, Funny

      Smells like an EMACS conspiracy.

      --
      You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.
  4. My Time Machine Works! by Spasmodeus · · Score: 5, Funny

    I've gone back in time six months!

  5. have you guys heard about this? by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hey! Check out this post I came across while browsing usenet. Have any of you heard anything about this? Sounds like it might be kinda cool.

    From: torvalds@klaava.Helsinki.FI (Linus Benedict Torvalds)
    Newsgroups: comp.os.minix
    Subject: Free minix-like kernel sources for 386-AT
    Keywords: 386, preliminary version
    Message-ID:
    Date: 5 Oct 91 05:41:06 GMT
    Organization: University of Helsinki
    Lines: 55

    Do you pine for the nice days of minix-1.1, when men were men and wrote
    their own device drivers? Are you without a nice project and just dying
    to cut your teeth on a OS you can try to modify for your needs? Are you
    finding it frustrating when everything works on minix? No more all-
    nighters to get a nifty program working? Then this post might be just
    for you :-)

    As I mentioned a month(?) ago, I'm working on a free version of a
    minix-lookalike for AT-386 computers. It has finally reached the stage
    where it's even usable (though may not be depending on what you want),
    and I am willing to put out the sources for wider distribution. It is
    just version 0.02 (+1 (very small) patch already), but I've successfully
    run bash/gcc/gnu-make/gnu-sed/compress etc under it.

    Sources for this pet project of mine can be found at nic.funet.fi
    (128.214.6.100) in the directory /pub/OS/Linux. The directory also
    contains some README-file and a couple of binaries to work under linux
    (bash, update and gcc, what more can you ask for :-). Full kernel
    source is provided, as no minix code has been used. Library sources are
    only partially free, so that cannot be distributed currently. The
    system is able to compile "as-is" and has been known to work. Heh.
    Sources to the binaries (bash and gcc) can be found at the same place in /pub/gnu.

    ALERT! WARNING! NOTE! These sources still need minix-386 to be compiled
    (and gcc-1.40, possibly 1.37.1, haven't tested), and you need minix to
    set it up if you want to run it, so it is not yet a standalone system
    for those of you without minix. I'm working on it. You also need to be
    something of a hacker to set it up (?), so for those hoping for an
    alternative to minix-386, please ignore me. It is currently meant for
    hackers interested in operating systems and 386's with access to minix.

    The system needs an AT-compatible harddisk (IDE is fine) and EGA/VGA. If
    you are still interested, please ftp the README/RELNOTES, and/or mail me
    for additional info.

    I can (well, almost) hear you asking yourselves "why?". Hurd will be
    out in a year (or two, or next month, who knows), and I've already got
    minix. This is a program for hackers by a hacker. I've enjouyed doing
    it, and somebody might enjoy looking at it and even modifying it for
    their own needs. It is still small enough to understand, use and
    modify, and I'm looking forward to any comments you might have.

    I'm also interested in hearing from anybody who has written any of the
    utilities/library functions for minix. If your efforts are freely
    distributable (under copyright or even public domain), I'd like to hear
    from you, so I can add them to the system. I'm using Earl Chews estdio
    right now (thanks for a nice and working system Earl), and similar works
    will be very wellcome. Your (C)'s will of course be left intact. Drop me
    a line if you are willing to let me use your code.

                    Linus

    PS. to PHIL NELSON! I'm unable to get through to you, and keep getting
    "forward error - strawberry unknown domain" or something.

    --
    This guy's the limit!
    1. Re:have you guys heard about this? by Abreu · · Score: 5, Funny

      I can (well, almost) hear you asking yourselves "why?". Hurd will be out in a year (or two, or next month, who knows), and I've already got minix.

      Everytime I see this, I don't know whenever I want to laugh or cry...

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    2. Re:have you guys heard about this? by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 5, Funny

      That's the beautiful thing about it. It's just as true today as it was 18 years ago.

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    3. Re:have you guys heard about this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I predict that within the year all desktops will run be running this amazing, new technology!

  6. Please... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    I work daily with humongous text files. I have found no other editor that performs as well when you work with text files that are in several gigabytes range. All the other major shell text editors cough instantly (tried for instance Emacs, it loaded one of those files for 30 minutes before I got bored of waiting) and most of the shiny new GUI editors are even worse. For instance gedit practically dies instantly on the stuff I work with.

    There is a place for vi*. You use them when the tool has to work. They are pain in the ass to use, but they manage things others do not.

    1. Re:Please... by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 4, Interesting

      If the files you are editing are *that* big, then a text editor is not the correct tool.

      Ok. Let's assume that you've been given a plain text file of that size, and you need to modify something in it. What tool do you suggest?

      I can think of the stock answers:

      "Load it into a database" - lots of hassle and probably overkill

      "Filter it with a custom script" - maybe, if you're a programmer

      "sed" - could work, but why bother if vim works? Personally, I can never remember the sed syntax.

      "Don't use text files that big" - Assumes facts not in evidence

      Any other suggestions?

  7. we learned one thing from this story posting... by Leto-II · · Score: 4, Funny

    We now know for sure kdawson is not a Vim user.

    --
    Do not anger the worm.
  8. Re:Do they have a real vi compatible mode? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm sorry. That was me. I asked for color. My bad.

  9. Great News! by PPH · · Score: 4, Funny

    I've been waitti^H^H damn! ^H^H ^Q ^[ .... :w :q :wq :wq! ^d
    exit X Q ^C ^? :quitbye CtrlAltDel ~~q :~q logout save/quit :!QUIT
    ^[zz ^[ZZZZZZ ^H man vi ^@ ^L ^[c ^# ^E ^X ^I ^T ? help helpquit ^D
    man quit ^C ^c ?Quit ?q CtrlShftDel "Hey, what does this button d..."

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.