Cambridge, Mass. Moves To Nix Security Cameras

An anonymous reader writes "Citing privacy concerns, the Cambridge, Mass. City Council has voted 9-0 to remove security cameras scattered throughout the city. 'Because of the slow erosion of our civil liberties since 9/11, it is important to raise questions regarding these cameras,' said Marjorie Decker, a Cambridge city councilor. Rather than citing privacy, WCBVTV is running the story under the headline 'City's Move To Nix Security Cams May Cost Thousands.'"

Comments

Re:Costing Thousands?

[Chyeld]

Additionally, often things like city wide security and red light cammeras are not monitored by actual government employees but companies sub-contracted out to do the job. Canceling the contract generally has a penalty involved.

Re:Costing Thousands?

[lupis42]

The cameras were bought with a DHS grant, which my have to be repaid.

Re:suddenoutbreakofcommonsense

[chicago_scott]

Except cameras don't catch people "redhanded". If they catch people at all it's almost always after the crime has been committed and the criminal has fled. Beyond that statistics show that public surveillance cameras do not reduce crime. Many studies of surveillance cameras have shown this to be the case.

CCTV Cameras
http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2008/06/cctv_cameras.html

Re:suddenoutbreakofcommonsense

[xenocide2]

Christ. Ever heard of the IRA? They're a recognized terror group residing within the UK.