Slashdot Mirror


Firefox Faster In Wine Than Native

An anonymous reader writes "Tuxradar did some benchmarks comparing Firefox's Windows and Linux JavaScript performance. 'We did some simple JavaScript benchmarks of Firefox 3.0 using Windows and Linux to see how it performed across the platforms — and the results are pretty bleak for Linux.' Later on, they tried Wine. 'The end result: Firefox from Mozilla or from Fedora has almost nil speed difference, and Firefox running on Wine is faster than native Firefox.'"

3 of 493 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Really a surprise? by clickclickdrone · · Score: 5, Insightful

    >But are we really going to try to maximize speed over durability?
    I was taught very early in my IT career that there are 3 considerations on any project.
    1. It can be cheap
    2. It can be fast
    3. It can be reliable.
    Now go and pick 2 out of 3.

    --
    I want a list of atrocities done in your name - Recoil
  2. I know that Swiftfox has not been making people by aussersterne · · Score: 5, Insightful

    happy for non-technical reasons, but I continue to use Swiftfox on Linux because it is so damned much faster than Fedora's Firefox build.

    I know that there is a CPU optimization difference, but I haven't looked into other differences. Someone who has looked at the buildconfig for both and/or who knows about the build processes and configurations of both: is the reason for the slowness in the comparison referenced in this post related at all to something that Swiftfox is fixing?

    --
    STOP . AMERICA . NOW
  3. Re:How fast do we need? by Hatta · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Have you visited Slashdot.org with javascript on in Firefox recently? It stalls for a couple seconds while formatting those god awful tags.

    I guess it's easier for Taco to wait for Firefox to get faster, instead of writing decent code to begin with.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!