Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft.com Makes IE8 Incompatibility List

nickull writes "Microsoft is tracking incompatible Web sites for its upcoming Internet Explorer 8 browser and has posted a list that now contains about 2,400 names — including Microsoft.com. Apparently, even though Microsoft's IE8 team is doing the 'right' thing by finally making IE more standards-compliant, they are risking 'breaking the Web' because the vast majority of Web sites are still written to work correctly with previous, non-standards-compliant versions of IE."

14 of 358 comments (clear)

  1. Fuck IE by jollyreaper · · Score: 4, Funny

    It can't even render simple fucking HTML properly. Simple little html table, written according to the guidelines. Looks spiff in Firefox, unholy mess in IE. The only way to make things line up properly in IE is to do illegal things that are correctly rendered as incompetent ass in Firefox.

    Fuck IE and the modem it was downloaded on.

    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    1. Re:Fuck IE by hubert.lepicki · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sorry, but which screenshot are you asking for? IE8 displaying elements not valid way, or that guy who posted original comment, doing activity with title of his post.

  2. Re:Google.com?! by snowgirl · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm no web developer but how can google.com be on that list as well? It is one of the simplest websites around. A text field, few links and a bit of javascript.

    The problem here is that Microsoft released a list of domains that are not properly supported, and the list contains one entry: "*.*"

    --
    WARNING! This girl exceeds the MAXIMUM SAFE standards established by the FDA for BRATTINESS
  3. Re:Where's the story? by techno-vampire · · Score: 5, Funny
    Or that Windows Update only worked through Internet Explorer?

    Well, what else do you expect? Windows Update works by taking advantage of a major security hole known as "ActiveX," and IE is the only browser that doesn't block it.

    --
    Good, inexpensive web hosting
  4. Re:Google.com?! by duguk · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...the list contains one entry: "*.*"

    At least my intranet site will be ok then :o)

  5. Re:Where's the story? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Oh wait thats from 10 years ago....

    So is Microsoft.com...

  6. Re:Options by NotBornYesterday · · Score: 3, Funny

    Bill Microsoft, of course.

    --
    I prefer rogues to imbeciles because they sometimes take a rest.
  7. Re:Options by BSDimwit · · Score: 5, Funny

    Who says anything has to be done for free. Consider this Microsoft's contribution to the economic stimulus package.

  8. Re:Options by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Calling all kettles, Calling all kettles, Pot to Black do you read me? I Read you Pot - lets go paint the pans, they're starting to get wise.

  9. Re:Options by itamihn · · Score: 5, Funny

    Bill Microsoft, of course.

    Bill Gates

  10. Re:Options by fireman+sam · · Score: 5, Funny

    That all depends on who's standards IE7 is being compared to. IE7 is not standards compliant when compared to the w3 standard, but is VERY compliant when compared to the MS standard.

    --
    it is only after a long journey that you know the strength of the horse.
  11. Re:Options by rrohbeck · · Score: 3, Funny

    Looks like you just found a reliable way to detect IE8.

  12. Re:Options by Anthony_Cargile · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yes they are, you just dislike them to the point where you want to run around screaming to the top of your lungs and hitting everything with your fists till they turn bloody, then you fall down and whimper yourself to sleep while murmuring "damn proprietary standards... I hate you!"

    There, fixed that for you.

  13. Re:Options by eikonos · · Score: 2, Funny

    they deserve to go down with the ship they hitched their trailers to

    This takes the car analogy in a whole new direction... the aquacar.