Slashdot Mirror


Wisconsin Passes Digital Download Tax

McGruber writes with news that the State of Wisconsin has passed legislation to extend sales tax to digital downloads. The new law will go into effect on October 1st. Estimates suggest that the 5% tax on "downloads of music, games, books, ring tones and other video entertainment" will bring in $6.7 million annually. "[Wisconsin Governor Jim Doyle] has been fighting for the change for years. He and other state officials say it is a matter of fairness: Internet vendors shouldn't have a tax-exempt advantage over Wisconsin's brick-and-mortar retail stores." Similar legislation has been proposed in North Carolina, and we've previously discussed New York's foray into taxing sales made online in addition to downloaded purchases.

3 of 327 comments (clear)

  1. Re:That's it -we're fucked. by larry+bagina · · Score: 3, Interesting

    interesting... let's say someone downloads something from the pirate bay. There's no sales tax involved, and that's not "fair".

    There are two solutions:

    • Tax you on all downloaded bytes (regardless of what it was)
    • Require you to list all downloaded media and pay a tax on it. Failing to do so is now a crime, and since it's tax court, things like "presumed innocence" or "exculpatory evidence" don't matter as much. And if you do list anything, the MPAA/RIAA lawyers will bend you over and cram a lawsuit up your ass.
    --
    Do you even lift?

    These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

  2. Re:I live in WI, and I say this sucks by mabhatter654 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    That's the problem with "business" taxes that aren't on property values. Michigan's reeling too, because the auto makers can basically pick and choose how much "profit" to have in a year. You and I are taxed on Income, with few deductions for "capital" investments (hint YOU can't deduct rent or car payments.. your company can). We can't choose to not make income. That's why PEOPLE have to pay the taxes. California has Hollywood and Silicon Valley.. they should generally be rolling in cash... both industries that are highly profitable.. .and very good at not actually showing that profit on the bottom line where the state gets a cut. That's why you don't ever let businesses off the property taxes.. it's the only thing that's hard to filch out of.

  3. Re:"FAIR"??? What's fair about taxes? by Mr2001 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Let's put is this way: taxes are never fair.

    Or, they're always fair, but "fair" doesn't mean "you get back exactly the amount of services that your taxes paid for".

    I mean, as you say, one could argue that a tax on brick and mortar stores pays for such things as roads to get to the stores, police to watch the store, etc. But it's not like a $1000 piece of jewelry (for which you pay $80 in sales tax) costs that much more to transport and guard than a $10 package of steaks (for which you pay 80 cents in sales tax). And it's not like the money is earmarked to be spent only on things that directly apply to retail stores.

    The fairness in taxes, or lack thereof, comes from how they're applied to people, not how the money is spent. Sales tax is arguably fair because everyone pays the same rate per purchased item. Income tax is arguably fair because the burden is highest for those who have the most disposable income. (Of course, these arguments are conflicting: if you like income tax because it's progressive, you ought to dislike sales tax because it's regressive.)

    Robert Heinlein said it best, "The power to tax, once conceded, has no limits; it contains until it destroys." ("The Moon Is A Harsh Mistress", 1966)

    Hmm... judging from the fact that countries with far higher tax rates than ours are still around, facilitating higher standards of living rather than becoming dystopian hellholes of oppression, it looks like Heinlein was wrong.

    --
    Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.