Slashdot Mirror
Court Reinstates Proof-of-Age Requirement For Nude Ads
arbitraryaardvark writes "An Ohio swinger's magazine objects to keeping proof on file that its advertisers are over 18. I reported here in 2007 that the 6th circuit struck down U.S.C. Title 18, Section 2257 as a First Amendment violation. The full 6th circuit has now overturned that ruling. The case might continue to the Supreme Court. The Cleveland Plain Dealer reports."
Suck my hairy dick bitch!
So you can't have child stars? Home Alone was a mistake? (Ok, bad example, but you get the idea.)
Or do you mean any nude model?
Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
The proof-of-age thing really hits picture collectors hard. For those pictures that do not have a site tag on them, if questioned, the collector must be able to come up with proof-of age. The only thing a court needs to convict you of possession of child pornography is 'reasonable suspicion' that the subject of the photo is underage and the pose is considered 'sexual.' There are many models out there that are well above the age of consent that might raise suspicions.
That's the risk you take when you have a predaliction for pre-teen looking girls and boys with shaved parts doing the nasty nasty... If you're into the Daddy-Doughter thing or the Mommy-Son thang or the Sister-Brother thing, you run the risks... OR MAYBE YOU JUST WANT TO FANTISIZE THAT YOUR ROCK HARD ONE EYED MONSTER IS TILLING THE SMOOTH TIGHT VIRGIN PUSSY OF A 12 YEAR OLD SLUT. One of those things. When your thrill is teenaged boy dumping their load in your mouth, well, sometimes it doesn't work out.
Slashdot Moderators will eagerly guzzle your cum if you agree with their dumb-ass views.
This is because Slashdot moderators are limp dicked retards.
"1. The photographer (or production company) must verify identity with a government-issued ID. If shot in the United States, the government-issued ID must be an American identification, even if the model is not from the United States, such as a cute chick on vacation for a couple weeks just traveling on her passport. Note that if you shoot outside the United States, a foreign ID is fine. Are you shooting in El Paso? You can go to prison for shooting your Estonian model on her passport and visitor's visa, but if you take her to Juarez and shoot her there, you're in the clear." Can you please clarify your usage of the word "shoot" in this statement? You're talking about Photography but Juarez is now infamous for the killings of women there and I'm not sure which definition of "shoot" you're trying to use.
Tubal ligations and vasectomys are the standard techniques of surgical sterilization. Some people are congenitally sterile others whilst not technically "sterile" are incapable of producing children without medical assistance. No homosexual sex has ever produced chidren. There are even plenty of things a fully fertile man and woman can do sexually which have very little likelyhood of the woman getting pregnant even without the use of any contraception.
"very little likelyhood" is unacceptable when you may create a child without a proper family.
Except purely homosexual acts (but see the so-called "pregnant man"), all of your "safe sex" ideas have been known to fail. Yes, even surgery and anal sex.
Also note that one or the other person may have some other relationship. (after all, you're not respecting the idea of marriage) Now you're spreading diseases, possibly to totally unaware innocent people including the unborn.