Slashdot Mirror


The Future of Google Chrome

TRNick writes "Lars Bak, who heads up development of Google Chrome's cornerstone javascript engine, talks about why Google is so focused on in-browser javascript performance, the role Chrome has played in driving up javascript performance in other browsers, and why it's taking so long to introduce support for third-party extensions. 'The web is becoming an integral part of the computer and the basic distinction between the OS and the browser doesn't matter very much any more,' he says."

17 of 294 comments (clear)

  1. I know the future... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Being uninstalled?

    1. Re:I know the future... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Then how did you install it in the first place?

      Very carefully. . .

    2. Re:I know the future... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Since when do you have to be a programmer to start an Open Source project?

    3. Re:I know the future... by crf00 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Because not everyone in Slashdot is a programmer?

      Now fixed that for ya.

  2. Re:annoyed by daybot · · Score: 4, Funny

    it sounds really strange and illogical if you are used to US-English

    Yeah, the normal and logical may seem that way if you're used to something so strange and illogical as US English - putting 'z' in almost every word, and I mean, MM/DD/YYYY? come on!

    Just kidding... we love how you've butchere^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^Hembraced our language :)

  3. Re:annoyed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    And I'm sure that the germans love how you've butchered theirs!

  4. Re:annoyed by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Funny

    We embraced during the colonial period. After the revolution we extended(and had Noah Webster ram our extensions through a standards body to give them an air of legitimacy).

    Don't worry, nothing bad could possibly happen next.

  5. Re:annoyed by daybot · · Score: 2, Funny

    We're gonna tax your coffee, you freeloaders!

  6. Re:annoyed by m.ducharme · · Score: 5, Funny

    incidentally, you may be unaware of the distinction made in the UK between pants and trousers, i.e. that pants are what one wears under trousers.

    --
    Rule of Slashdot #0: You and people like you are not representative of the larger population. - A.C.
  7. Re:JavaScript assembly language by abigsmurf · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yeah we could have a platform independent language that compiles efficiently into a type of code easily run by virtual machines.

    Not sure about the name Javascript though, think it sounds a bit complex and we need to distinguish it from the browser only one. Lets just call it Java

  8. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  9. Re:annoyed by teh+kurisu · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is why Superman dresses as he does. He landed in America, and was told to wear his pants on the outside.

  10. Re:annoyed by coopaq · · Score: 3, Funny

    "incidentally, you may be unaware of the distinction made in the UK between pants and trousers, i.e. that pants are what one wears under trousers."

    So what the hell are under-pants in the UK then? Do they go under your pants?

    You guys wear 3 layers of pant?

    Do you wear a pair of pants or more? So confusing.

    All I know is if you wear pants under your trousers and that's all... well then you aren't wearing underwear and that's nasty.

  11. Re:annoyed by Inda · · Score: 2, Funny

    You mean during the colonial fullstop?

    --
    This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
  12. Re:How Many People Even Use Chrome? by whoop · · Score: 2, Funny

    How many people even view Slashdot? I only ask because I don't know of many. Does it even exist? I asked the baby sitter and she said no. Also, what are these personal computer things? My company only lets us use winterms. Obviously, this whole PC fad is not ready for any real use since my job gets by just fine without them and my job is the determining factor for anything needing to exist.

  13. Re:annoyed by Abcd1234 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Still, if you write "february 26th"? I have to ask - 26th of what?

    Uhh... February. You know, like "day 42 - George and I are still stranded on this desert island, and each day, he looks tastier and tastier..." That isn't too terribly confusing for you, is it? :)

  14. Re:Muddy-soft waters... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2, Funny

    can't we have some type of integration once in a while?

    No. You should read your internets by sending email to a daemon on a different box that downloads the pages and sends them to you as text files, the way Stallman intended things to be.