Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Bunnie Huang on China's "Shanzai" Mash-Up Design Shops

Posted by timothy on from the gibsonstephensonesque dept.

saccade.com writes "Bunnie (of XBox hacking and Chumby fame) has written an insightful post about how a new phenomena emerging out of China called 'Shanzai' has impacted the electronics business there. A new class of innovators, they're going beyond merely copying western designs to producing electronic "mash-ups" to create new products. Bootstrapped on small amounts of capital, they range from shops of just a few people to a few hundred. They rapidly create new products, and use an "open source" style design community where design ideas and component lists are shared."

11 of 181 comments (clear)

  1. USA is losing because we think we're winning by mpoulton · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is why the US is falling behind faster than we think. We are more governmentally encumbered and less capitalist than China in many ways!

    --
    I am a geek attorney, but not your geek attorney unless you've already retained me. This is not legal advice.
    1. Re:USA is losing because we think we're winning by KibibyteBrain · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This is also part of the problem in outsourcing the actual industrial production of all this stuff. It's really hard to remain innovative and relevant when you design by CAD tool only. This whole idea of design here produce there is just not sustainable for very long. Daily hands on experience with a wide variety of actual manufacturing technologies and techniques is part of what made the US innovative before and is what of what will make China innovative in the future.

    2. Re:USA is losing because we think we're winning by mochan_s · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This is why the US is falling behind faster than we think. We are more governmentally encumbered and less capitalist than China in many ways!

      Why is it that with China the first reflex is always "us vs them" like the parent post?

      The Chinese will innovate with the resources that the Chinese have while the US will innovate with the resources that the Americans have (note no us and they).

      I don't understand why people feel that it would be better if the Chinese were deprived of this opportunity. I would be more inclined to say "join the party", the "more the merrier" in the engineer's club.

    3. Re:USA is losing because we think we're winning by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think another part of the problem is when engineers, mathematicians and so on graduate and work for the financial services industry. So they design the latest fad financial service rather than the latest fad electronic device.

      At least electronic devices don't up end entire economies like intellectually bankrupt financial services apparently can.

    4. Re:USA is losing because we think we're winning by Ihmhi · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This is one of the two reasons why I admire Steve Wozniak as a person. He's a tinkerer at heart. He'll sit down at a table with various parts and put together something that's cool. Engineering is like lego for geniuses.

      .

      .

      (The other reason I admire Woz is for his sweet, pimped-out Segway.)

      --
      Random Thoughts From A Diseased Mind (Not For Dummies)
    5. Re:USA is losing because we think we're winning by jabithew · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Because people are stupid and think economics is a zero-sum game. This leads to the chain;

      China is getting richer.
      If China is getting richer, someone is getting poorer.
      We are getting poorer.

      Whereas the only thing that holds is the first. If China is getting richer, it means they have more money to buy things from the US/EU and less competitive labour!

      --
      All intents and purposes. Not intensive purposes.
    6. Re:USA is losing because we think we're winning by agnosticnixie · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Basic human nature is cooperative.

  2. MBA shortsightedness by hwyhobo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    For temporary profit (that few have participated in) we have outsourced ourselves into irrelevance. As the purchasing power of the increasingly service-based economy diminishes, so do the profits. It is a shortsighted policy - something that MBAs excel at.

    --
    End anonymous moderation and posting on /.
  3. Cf. Silicon Valley by femto · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The big thing going for the Shan Zhai is that their component makers are just around the corner. Need a touch screen for you iPhone knock off? Duck across town and talk to "Joe" and buy a few crate fulls off him. No long distance language barriers, freighting, delay, currency exchange or other things that an kill momentum in a project. It's not that different to Silicon Valley, in that it is effectively a technology shopping mall for engineers.

    Compare that to Australia, where I live. Manufacturing base is close to zlich. Components have to be procured from overseas and local distributors are just not interested. Most time and effort goes into procurement rather than design. Better be sure of your design too, as deciding to make a design change involves a while new procurement cycle. No ducking down to "the local" to get a replacement. As an engineer, I'm envious.

  4. Re:Capitalistic open source super cool by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 5, Insightful

    +2 insightful? WTF? Shanzhai manufacturing is RIPPING OFF OTHER PEOPLE'S IDEAS, it has nothing to do with innovation, open source, etc. You think a Shanzhai manufacturer is going to let me into his factory and inspect his line? Maybe he'll post his CAD drawings and mold milling specifications on the web? Make a forum post where he reveals the specific material he uses, his suppliers, and the prices and contract terms he got from them? You want to see what shanzhai manufacturing makes? Crapity-crap like this janky fake Wii. I guarantee there's no way it will last more than six months, guarantee it. It's not open source at all, free flow of ideas? If by free flow, you mean one-way flow - to the shanzhai guy and not the other way around. It's "let me rip you off, make a cheap crap copy, add a couple of features from OTHER people's work (features that are probably not well-thought-out, nor integrated well with existing features) and sell it at a discount by disobeying all environmental regulations (China DOES have them), and forcing my workers to work overtime for free otherwise I'll fire them and have them beaten by thugs if they complain. I know more manufacturers than you do, buddy.

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  5. Grrr. by apodyopsis · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This was happening years ago, back in 2005 in my last trip for example.

    What is really behind this is a business that is not shackled by the same leg irons that cripple development in the west - for example accountability, itellectual property, patenting, copyright, health and safety, quality management and so on.

    The gist of the problem is that you can either have development that is ethical, safe, manageable, legal, and controlled.... or you can development that is rapid, fluid and prone to appropiate and adapt any idea that fits the bill.

    It is impossible to have both.

    In China you see an emphasis on the latter and in the west you have the former, this is a culture clash of epic proportions. At the end of the day we are all to blame, we all like the idea of promoting western businesses and industry - but we all have a greater desire for cheap DVD players and iPhone clones.

    Yes I can appreciate the rapid, innovative engineering this trend shows in China - but behind it is a clash of cultures and ethical and moral decisions that have decimated industy and development in the western world.