Canadian ISPs Speak Out Against Net Neutrality
Ars Technica reports on a proceeding being held by the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission regarding net neutrality. They requested comments from the public as part of the debate, and several Canadian ISPs took the opportunity to explain why they think it's a bad idea. Quoting:
"One of the more interesting responses came from an ISP called Videotron, which told the CRTC that controlling access to content ... 'could be beneficial not only to users of Internet services but to society in general.' As examples of such benefits, Videotron mentioned the control of spam, viruses, and child pornography. It went on to suggest that graduated response rules — kicking users off the 'Net after several accusations of copyright infringement — could also be included as a benefit to society in general. ... Rogers, one of Canada's big ISPs, also chimed in and explained that new regulations might limit its ability to throttle P2P uploads, which it does at the moment. 'P2P file sharing is designed to cause network congestion,' says the company. 'It contributes significantly to latency, thereby making the network unreliable for certain users at periods of such congestion.'"
not like you and your infinity low uid? I've used slashdot since the day I heard about it post as an anonymous coward for almost a year before feeling the need to participate and get a user account. I have a fairly low uid but it would have been lower if I had signed up earlier. Who are you to say someone hasn't been following slashdot for years just because of a stupid fucking number that means nothing besides one day wanting to go and click register instead of reply and posting as anonymous.
Stop trolling or if your going to bitch about uids at least have the balls to use your own and take the karma hit for being an idiot.