Slashdot Mirror


Safari Beta Takeup Tops Firefox, IE and Chrome

nk497 writes "The release of the beta for the next version of Apple's Safari browser last week helped drive Apple's market share above ten per cent. The Safari beta has gained users at a rate of about 0.5 per cent a day since its release, topping one per cent by day four. For comparison, Microsoft's beta of IE took six months to hit one percent, Chrome needed almost a month, and Firefox 3 took a week."

6 of 342 comments (clear)

  1. I'm getting old, I don't understand the New Math by Alsee · · Score: 4, Insightful

    about 0.5 per cent a day... topping one per cent by day four

    -

    --
    - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  2. Not Meaningful by Nemyst · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't think that kind of thing is actually meaningful at all. Sure, they are gaining more people to try out their beta. The issue is with whether they'll be able to keep them.

    Look at Google Chrome; the browser's first few weeks were all rosy as people flocked to the browser. After a few months, though, things got back to "normal" and users went back to their usual browser after the hype machine had died down and the novelty wore off. If they can get that percentage and KEEP it, then we can say they've achieved something.

  3. Why? Trust. by Lord+Grey · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think the reason behind this is due to trust. Specifically, trust in the "it just works" history that Apple currently enjoys. Mac users are used to that, expect it, and believe that something like a new Safari will actually work and may even perform as advertised. They're willing to give it a try at an early stage. I did: I'm typing this reply now in the Safari beta. And hey, it does Just Work, at least so far.

    Now, I'm not saying that Apple always deserves that level of trust. They've made mistakes in the past, some of them real doozies. But in general, the average Mac user has a fairly high regard for Apple products. More so than Microsoft users for Windows products, certainly.

    --
    // Beyond Here Lie Dragons
  4. Re:Safari doesn't work with Hotmail by August26 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Maybe it's Hotmail that is broken.

  5. This would be good news for KDE only if... by bogaboga · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...the KDE folks would "dump" KHTML for Webkit. I just mean "default to Webkit in Konqueror." Such a move would raise Konqueror's profile which cannot be a bad thing.

    Right now, Konqueror is a non issue when it comes to browser statistics on the internet. In some statistics, it is lumped like other browsers into the "other" category like here . And over here , Konqueror is missing all together! Sad indeed.

    While I say this, I know egos are high in the Open Source world, so what I am suggesting has little chance of being adopted.

    Now, before I get modded a troll, I would like to know whether what I am suggesting is a very bad thing.

  6. No add-ons by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The problem with both Chrome and Safari is a lack of an add-on community. One of the things that continues to make Firefox a success is that the user community has added all the niche functionality anyone would ever want and more.