Slashdot Mirror


Amiga Community Collaborates On Restorative Gel To Brighten Your Old Plastic

jamie pointed out an Amiga community that took a discovery of how to restore old computer plastic, super-charged it, and then opened the process to the public domain. Time to spruce up those old dusty TRS-80s in the basement. "All of the initial tests were done with a liquid and we realized that for large parts this was getting expensive, so the next stage was to make a paintable 'gel' version that could be brushed onto larger surfaces. This was tried in Arizona in the sun and the UK under a UV lamp and was found to be just as effective as the liquid. We have now released this to the public domain for anyone to use as we can't patent it and we coined the nickname 'Retr0brite' for it, as it summed up what we were actually doing with it."

35 of 225 comments (clear)

  1. From the wiki by FrameRotBlues · · Score: 4, Insightful

    However, a chance discovery was made in March 2008, by The CBM Museum at Wuppertal in Germany, that immersing parts in a solution of Hydrogen Peroxide could partially reverse the process.

    They accidentally immersed old plastic parts in Hydrogen Peroxide?

    Sounds like a "whoops" turned into a "cool!"

    1. Re:From the wiki by smellsofbikes · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Or they were trying to bleach it and clean off all the accumulated crap, and found that it did that *and* changed the surface chemistry as well.

      I used to restore old watches -- the mechanical ones. They're jammed with grease and wax that mechanics didn't put there and usually that's a large part of why they're not working. It's fairly routine to dunk something that looks like the Antikythera Mechanism into a cleaner just to get all the horribleness out.
      (A note to anyone considering doing this: avoid ammonia. Those are very delicate little bits of brass. Ammonia works spectacularly well. If you leave a watch movement in there for an hour rather than just a few minutes, you'll come back to find all the wax *and* all the metal completely gone except for the steel and a few of the large pivots.)

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
  2. Amiga Community by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Both of them?

    --

    Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

  3. Re:After so much silence.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Fuck computers. We're going into gels."

    I think KY already has a product for that.

  4. Hydrogen peroxide attacks some plastics by hcdejong · · Score: 5, Informative

    You'd have to be careful with at least PET, because that degrades when exposed to H2O2 for more than a minute or so. So I'd check for possible side-effects before attempting to spruce up your preciousss with this.

    1. Re:Hydrogen peroxide attacks some plastics by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 4, Funny

      You'd have to be careful with at least PET, because that degrades when exposed to H2O2 for more than a minute or so

      No no, they're talking about restoring AMIGAS, not those angular early 8-bit Commodore computers.

  5. Re:How many other uses? by je+ne+sais+quoi · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I immediately thought of old toys, like my precious ships for the star wars action figures, the imperial shuttle or b-wing whose plastic is all faded and yellowed. Now I can run around the room with them making laser noises and re-enact scenes from ROTJ just like I did when I was eight. Awesome!

    --
    Gentlemen! You can't fight in here, this is the war room!
  6. Strong oxidants and glycerine? by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Better make it only in small batches. B-(

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  7. Re:After so much silence.. by duguk · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Fuck computers. We're going into gels."

    I think KY already has a product for that.

    But that's only for Apple users ;o) /joke

  8. Amiga TRS-80? by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Ah yes... the venerable Amiga TRS-80. As much as I appreciate the requisite throwaway jokes in summaries, you really couldn't think of any Commodore Amiga product? Even a C64 jab would have been better.

    --
    If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
  9. Don't knock the Amiga by Weaselmancer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Back in the day, Ami was a real contender.

    Buy an A1000 and run some graphics demos on one. Then try to remember that it was made in 1985.

    I've always dreamed of what the world would be like if modern computing had gone this route. Imagine your OS as a bank of roms, and your PC as a fully integrated machine rather than a patchwork of PCI cards and third party drivers.

    Seriously, Amiga was an excellent design.

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
    1. Re:Don't knock the Amiga by PitaBred · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yea. Amigas can do anything!

      That aside, Bones is actually a pretty good show if you can ignore the "scientific" leaps.

    2. Re:Don't knock the Amiga by mdwh2 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I've always dreamed of what the world would be like if modern computing had gone this route. Imagine your OS as a bank of roms, and your PC as a fully integrated machine rather than a patchwork of PCI cards and third party drivers.

      But in many ways, I'd argue that modern computing has gone the Amiga way: consider how most motherboards now have everying on board, and it's only the graphics card that people might optionally have as an extra for performance. (Whilst drivers can be a pain, they have the advantage of allowing standardisation through an API - the Amiga was moving towards a driver model for graphics and so on, and I'd have thought it a great advantage for any modern machine taking advantage of 3D hardware, so chances are that a hypothetical modern Amiga would have drivers too. Chances are they would've dropped the ROMs too - AmigaOS 3.5 onwards came entirely on CD.)

      Consider: today I run a multitasking OS, with combined GUI and command line. The machine I use has dedicated graphics and sound chips, and everything's integrated on the motherboard. Finally, I'd argue that today's machines are modern Amigas. Compare that to the DOS based PCs, or single-tasking non-command-line and no-chipsets on the classic Macs. Looking back, it's laughable how people back then tried to justify their expensive primitive purchases (e.g., claiming that it was better not to have a GUI), when we see how computers are designed today. The Amiga was written off as a games machine, but what is it that now drives the 3D graphics industry, and arguably the personal computer industry as a whole? Yes, I like having a fast machine with decent graphics in front of me, rather than a boring command line operated piece of business furniture, or a black and white interface that doesn't let me do things the way I want it. The only thing stopping it being a modern Amiga is the trademark.

    3. Re:Don't knock the Amiga by mmontour · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Buy an A1000 and run some graphics demos on one. Then try to remember that it was made in 1985.

      Remember also that many of the main features of Microsoft's Windows 95 (32-bit code, preemptive multitasking, long-filename support) were present in the original "Amiga 85" OS.

    4. Re:Don't knock the Amiga by commodore64_love · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Everyone blames Commodore, but let's face it, the early 90s was a rough time for the computer industry. Atari went bankrupt (goodbye ST), Commodore went bankrupt (goodbye Amiga), and Apple would have gone bankrupt too (goodbye Macintosh) if it had not been saved at the last minute by Gates. The industry was consolidating around the Intel 486 platform, and I don't think ST, Amiga, or Macintosh would have survived even if run by someone as brilliant as Andrew Carnegie. What they offered looked unattractive to early 90s computer users who believed alternative platforms were as obsolete as newspapers today, and that everyone should be using the soon-to-arrive Windows95. In fact I can still remember the near-hatred from my fellow students: "You use an Amiga??? Everyone knows companies use IBM, and so too should you. You wasted your money."

      Statistics show that less than 7% were interested in a non-IBM-compatible platform in 1994. That was quite a blow to Commodore who just eight years earlier controlled 40% of the market. Even now I can't believe Macintosh is still alive (3% share). I suspect if Gates focused his energies, and stopped Ballmer from making boneheaded decisions, he could kill-off the Mac fairly easily..... just as he almost succeeded in doing circa 1994.

      Point - Nothing could have saved Commodore. Just as nothing could save JVC from losing its VHS market. The market had changed. (link - http://arstechnica.com/old/content/2005/12/total-share.ars/10 )

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    5. Re:Don't knock the Amiga by Twinbee · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm guessing the 'patchwork' allows more competition for companies to one-up each other, and also allows for a more modular design. I loved the Amiga, but as long as decent interfaces and standards are used, it makes sense to modularize.

      --
      Why OpalCalc is the best Windows calc
    6. Re:Don't knock the Amiga by commodore64_love · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I agree. Today's PCs are not Amigas, but they are the result of copying the Amiga philosophy. Computer makers aren't stupid. They may have dismissed the Amiga as "just a gaming machine" like they did with the C=64, but they also saw that Amigas were being used by Disney to animate movies, by NBC and WB to create special effects, and by desktop publishers for integrating graphics into print media like magazines.

      It was only natural, rather than lose those users to Commodore, the computer makers adapted. They produced the Sound Blaster to create music. They produced graphics cards that did 16 colors than 256 colors than 65,000. It was a slow process that took around ten years time (1985-to-1995) but eventually PCs became "gaming machines" themselves. Except they wisely called it "multimedia" rather than "gaming".

      Oh well. The business people did what they are paid to do - dismiss the competition as non-relevant "gaming junk" while secretly copying those same ideas into their own machines, until they can co-opt the market for themselves. It's not personal; just business.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    7. Re:Don't knock the Amiga by commodore64_love · · Score: 2, Informative

      >>>ATARI ST > Switch on > under GEM within 3 seconds

      Uh. Amiga Workbench was no different. Turn-on, boot from floppy, and done in 2-3 seconds. ----- If you go directly to a CLI then it's virtually instantaneous (the OS is in the kickstart ROM).

      Jeez.

      I can't believe I just got sucked into another ST versus Amiga argument. I thought that nonsense ended twenty years ago. Well at least the Amiga could play music straight out of the box, thanks to its Paula sound chip. The ST sound sucked; like an old 1978 Atari 8-bit, or a touchtone phone. Beep-boop-beep. Even the lowly NES sounds better than an ST.

      Zing. I've still got it. ;-)

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    8. Re:Don't knock the Amiga by Civil_Disobedient · · Score: 2, Informative

      Too bad it was made by Commodore.

      Hey, now. The original Amiga--the technical foundation of the entire line of systems--wasn't designed by Commodore. It was primarily the brainchild of Jay Miner, the same IC guru that designed the Atari 2600's graphics chip, TIA.

      What's really too bad is that it was marketed by Commodore.

    9. Re:Don't knock the Amiga by schon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What's really too bad is that it wasn't marketed by Commodore.

      There, fixed that for you. :)

    10. Re:Don't knock the Amiga by rs79 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "Nothing could have saved Commodore."

      I should just repost old comp.sys.amiga threads and save eevrybody some time, and subtitle it "why am I doing this, I know better?". But anyway.

      I had an Atari 400, and made some hardhacks and sw for it. I had an A1000 with a HARD DRIVE. Yes, I rawked, utterly. I worked on a thing that was the precursor to flash, it came from the Amiga.

      One thing would have propelled the Amiga into stardom: Lotus 1-2-3. Lotus set the world on fire in PC land and you had to had one if you pretended you were in business. Word Perfect was the other one. These two were the first PC killer apps. VisiCalc was cute, Lotus sold computers.

      1-2-3 didn't run on the Amiga. Word Perfect did, but way too late and it sucked to the point where it wasn't as good as the MS-DOS version on PCs, remember this is all pre-windows.

      The Atari hung on cause it did Midi well. DTP and art queers kept the Mac alive. The Amiga was the coolest, but back then cool didnt't matter/drive sales. Lotus did.

      And before you freak out, some of my best friends are art queers.

      --
      Need Mercedes parts ?
    11. Re:Don't knock the Amiga by keeboo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I never could understand Atari ST users.

      Choosing a ST over Amiga they saved, what, 100 USD and got a good processor, a OK display, a horrible sound output and a mediocre OS (the MIDI output was nice, but how many people actually used that?). Atari had some good software, let's be fair.
      But then they started that ridiculous holy war vs Amiga. If they were so frustrated, why didn't they buy an Amiga in the first place?

      Atari ST was an OK machine back then, but comparing to an Amiga was just ridiculous.

    12. Re:Don't knock the Amiga by commodore64_love · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Anyone who denies Apple was near-bankruptcy circa 1994 is in denial. I was there. I recall reading the news articles and wondering if Apple would make it, or if my Macintosh would soon become a paperweight like my Amiga had become.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
  10. Re:How many other uses? by budgenator · · Score: 2, Informative

    I assume that they are an acrylic, although polycarboanate plastic is also a possibility. I also assume that they are the thermoplastic variety rather than the thermosetting type. Acrylics often use an amine catalyst which tends to cause yellowing. Moisture and UV exposure causes embrittlement, clouding, cracking and crazing in acrylics.

    --
    Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
  11. tooth whitening anyone? by DnemoniX · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Really sounds like tooth whitening gel to me. Some of those procedures use high energy light to excite the peroxide which speeds up the process.

  12. One man's patina... by RevWaldo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...is another man's sickly yellow. The basic rule of thumb for antiques/collectibles is to never remove its patina e.g. all that crap that's built up on its surface over the years, as it's an undeniable indication of its age (plus sometimes it just looks cool.)

    Then again, vintage car fans don't hesitate to break out the paint and the rust remover.

    Will diehard technology collectors prefer plastic as yellow as a smoking lounge drop ceiling, or returned to its brilliant off-whiteness?

  13. Re:not news: bleach alternative cleans things by Kell+Bengal · · Score: 3, Informative

    The problem here is that it's not that the plastic is 'unclean' but that the material has chemically reacted with UV and fire retardants to fade the plastic itself. It's the MacBeth of stains - you scrub and it never comes out.

    --
    Scientists point out problems, engineers fix them
    altslashdot.org: The future of slashdot.
  14. Pluses and minuses by Ancient_Hacker · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What you're doing is applying an oxygenating bleach to the surface. Works quite well to remove the yellow. But anytime you apply oxygen to a surface you speed up the rate of .... oxidation!

    So while you're whitening it, you're also speeding up the deterioration of the plastic.

    If you've ever used an "ozone generator" to remove smoke odors you know it does that job very well, and it also destroys every rubber band, ballpoint pen, and bicycle tire in the area.

    1. Re:Pluses and minuses by chiark · · Score: 2, Informative

      I *think* that it's not oxygenating at all: the chemistry is replacing oxygen that is bonded to a bromine (or bromide? dunno) compond with a hydrogen compound. Or something like that.

      I think it's absolutely not oxidation: the "vanish oxy action" is used for its TAED content which may act as a catalyst, not the oxygenating properties.

  15. Re:After so much silence.. by fireman+sam · · Score: 4, Funny

    Or you can use the DIY Gentoo based computer called "Go fuck yourself"

    --
    it is only after a long journey that you know the strength of the horse.
  16. Re:offtopic, but by DECS · · Score: 3, Funny

    You're looking for Paul Thurrott's SUPERSITE for WINDOWS.

    He's the AM Radio of the tech industry and the intellectual force behind the Microsoft Party.

  17. Bingo - exactly by Weaselmancer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yeah basically, but the Mac was missing the key element of "helper" coprocessors.

    That's it exactly. Amiga was years ahead of the competition. The design was simply brilliant. We didn't have a lot of speed. The processor is 8 freaking MHz. But with clever and elegant design, the thing could do miracles.

    And the thought I have now is - what if this had been the main thrust of computing? What if this had become the dominant design paradigm? Add 20+ years of work and research onto that idea rather than the IBM beige box. Take the Amiga design concept and move that into a 3Ghz processor realm, with nVidia doing the Angus chip equivalent.

    Computers today would look like the things we see in sci-fi movies. It'd be unreal.

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
  18. Hi - Let the flamefest begin....... by MerlinUK · · Score: 5, Informative

    Hi, I am the guy that wrote the Wiki. Now, I know that there are skeptics out there and I may have over simplified the science a bit so that non-nerds can understand what's going on, but I am open to listen to anyone who can explain the chemistry that is actually going on in a coherent way. I may have made it too simple I suppose. Regarding the ABS polymer itself; consider that black car bumpers and trim are made from (yes you've guessed it) ABS. These tend to go white (not yellow or brown) over a long time in sunlight. This is the ABS polymer degrading to the hydroperoxide via oxidation. The computer parts only go white if you use too strong a peroxide solution, so what is reacting under UV so quickly? My theory is it's the TBBP-A flame retardant which is active under UV and decomposes. There is also the phenomenon of migration, where ingredients can move within the plastic matrix and eventually get to the surface. I believe that the degradation products of TBBP-A migraet through the ABS and this is what make it discolour as the molecules attract oxygen molecules. There have also been comments elsewhere that the site is a hoax and that the photos are faked; if this were so, how could the photographs post in the various forums threads I added to the Reading section of the Wiki this morning be faked? They aren't, simple as......... I know I risk feeding trolls with this but this isn't a hoax. As this uses properietary products as part of the mixture, it couldn't be patented, however, I suppose I could have patented the use of H2O2 with TAED in a use for treating plastic. I chose not to and so it was released for all into the public domain. Don't flame me; try it for yourself. Let the flaming begin...........

  19. Re:RTFA - not bleaching by mollymoo · · Score: 2, Informative

    The in-depth explanation of the chemistry on the site describes the relevant reaction as a reduction of the free bromine produced when the flame retardant decomposes.

    --
    Chernobyl 'not a wildlife haven' - BBC News
  20. Re:enough with the "saved apple" BS by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Let me make that perfectly clear: the amount of money involved in the deal was insignificant to BOTH parties, and Microsoft got what it paid for.

    If the money involved in the deal was insignificant to both parties, then why did money change hands, and why did Microsoft actually get something for it other than a big lump of stock? I call shenanigans.

    PS:It wasn't Jobs that was responsible for OS X. It was Amelio- he bought NEXT after BeOS stuck its thumb up at Apple and demanded a fortune. Jobs repaid the favor by manipulating the stock price and ousting Amelio.

    From where I was sitting it looked very much like Apple wanted Jobs back, and Jobs came with NeXT and no other way. But then, I wasn't an Apple fan at the time. I outgrew that when Apple was insulting us with 68040s.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"