Slashdot Mirror


White House Ditches YouTube

An anonymous reader writes to tell us that in an apparent response to privacy complaints, the White House has quietly moved off of YouTube as a method for serving the President's weekly video address. Choosing instead to use a Flash-based solution and Akamai's content delivery network, this comes just days after YouTube began to roll out their own new policies regarding privacy of visitors.

4 of 204 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Wise choice by PetriBORG · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Maybe so, but do if you are hoping to get young people - people who wouldn't otherwise notice you - to notice you, then maybe you would post it to some place they go right? I'm wondering why they can't just post them to multiple places - now that seems a more reasonable question to me.

    --
    Pete/Petri "damn, my chainsaw is clogged with 1's and 0's again." --clyde
  2. Re:Wise choice by Chabo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Oh yes, and I'd also like to see a .torrent on the site, but I know that'll never happen.

    --
    Convert FLACs to a portable format with FlacSquisher
  3. Re:Wise choice by LWATCDR · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I tend to agree. The thing is that the government doesn't pay for the broadcast of the press release.
    I would have no problem with the BBC streaming the addresses themselves. Or CBS, NBC, Hulu, PBS, NPR, or any other news service.
    Just for the US me as a tax payer to pay for it. As I said at the start I so don't have a problem with it being on YouTube at all. But this will probably end up costing millions all over a cookie.

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  4. Re:Wise choice by plnix0 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If the president would like to speak to the American people, why not choose something not affiliated with any company.

    You mean... like Akamai?