George Riddick — the One-Man RIAA of Clip Art

An anonymous reader writes "Pages at ireport.com and extortionletterinfo.com have been documenting and researching the activities of George P. Riddick III, previously known for his lawsuits against IMSI and Xoom at the turn of the century. In 2007 he issued a largely-ignored press release claiming the majority of clip art online infringes a copyright and has ranted about how Microsoft and Google are stealing from him. In recent months, he's apparently made a business model of going after web site operators who were using clip art they believed to be legally licensed or public domain, telling them they're infringing clip art collections he hasn't offered commercially in years and making outrageous settlement demands. He seems to have tested the waters on this some years back, but emboldened by the passage of the PRO-IP act, he's gone aggro with it. A few dodgy anonyblogs had popped up to 'out' him as a copyright abuser, but these recent ireport.com and extortionletterinfo.com reports go much deeper in documenting and researching Riddick's recent one-man campaign to be the RIAA of clip art."

Comments

And they called it

[Rosco P. Coltrane]

"Pages at ireport.com and extortionletterinfo.com have been documenting and researching the activities of George P. Riddick III

they call the document "the chronicles of riddick"

*bad-dum-dah*

I'll be here all week

Re:Growing network of victims!

[Anonymous Coward]

the majority of clip art online infringes a copyright

Notice, too, that he doesn't state outright that it infringes his copyright, only implies it.

I wonder if he has a copyright on a single black pixel, and is trying to count everything else as a derivative work......

Re:Ahh, fair use

[Inda]

Actually, I believe your Mom hangs out in alt.binaries.embroidery* and is in fact "Yenc-PP-A&A". The same "Yenc-PP-A&A" who posts countless music and movies.

Your clever attempt at deflecting the pointing finger has failed.

*(of course it exists!)