Slashdot Mirror
Linux Foundation Purchases Linux.com
darthcamaro and several other readers have noted that the Linux Foundation has bought Linux.com from SourceForge Inc. (Slashdot's corporate parent). The Linux Foundation (employer of Linus Torvalds) will take over the editorial and community stewardship for the site; SourceForge will continue to supply advertising on it. "[Linux Foundation Executive Director Jim] Zemlin says the Linux Foundation wants to build a collaborative forum where Linux users can share ideas and get information on the Linux operating system. A beta of the site will be released in the next few months. ... Linux.com is being redesigned as a central source for Linux software, documentation and answers regardless of platforms, including server, desktop/netbook, mobile and embedded areas." What do you think should be on Linux.com?
A redirect to .org seems to be an appropriate option.
3.243F6A8885A308D313
I don't know for a fact, but I'd guess that a number of visitors will be people who have heard of "that linux thing" and punched in www.linux.com to find out more. While I think it's great that Ubuntu is great for having critical mass and gaining mainstream momentum, I also think it's in everyone's interest to explain, in simple terms, that Linux != Ubuntu, and that Linux is, in a manner of speaking, a whole lot more than Ubuntu.
using google is worse than no information. Many guides and howtos are years out of date. (Google gives a higher page rank to older pages)
Do you even lift?
These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.
With such an obvious name, linux.com is where many newbs go first. The forums were not that great to begin with, and in the last few weeks they even lost all formatting, including newlines. I'm glad to see that such an important domain name will be put to good use now.
A neutral communications medium is essential. It is the basis of science, by which humankind should decide what is true.
Seriously, when is /. going to do something about kdawson? Crappy articles, misspellings, you name it.
If your guys can't even get the name right of the guy who pretty much wrote Linux, it's time to make some changes in the editorial department.
Veni, Vidi, Velcro!
Oh my CHRIST! You're right, I didn't even believe it.
The text, when you visit http://linux.org/ reads:
Incorrect Site
For comprehensive information about Linux please visit our proper site, www.linux.org.
Please update your bookmarks and any links you may have to this old site.
What it should read is something along the lines of:
Duuuh
Despite Linux's popularity, this site is run by people who aren't smart enough to point linux.org and www.linux.org to the same page. (It apparently worked in the past, but we broke it.)
Please update your bookmarks and any links you may have to this old site, because we pointlessly and broke all our own links when we broke our own site and probably slaughtered our own pagerank in the process.
I agree wholeheartedly with the parent. It's amazing that a site like this still exists in 2009... heck I'd much rather see http://linux.org/ just 404 or time-out then give you this crap. "Proper site!" Unbelievable.
Comment of the year