Slashdot Mirror


Calif. Politican Thinks Blurred Online Maps Would Deter Terrorists

Hugh Pickens writes "California Assemblyman Joel Anderson plans to introduce a bill to force Google Earth and similar services to blur images of so-called 'soft targets' like schools, hospitals, churches and government buildings to protect them from terrorists. 'All I'm trying to do is stop terrorists,' said Anderson. 'I don't want California to be helping map out future targets for terrorists.' Concerns that detailed satellite imagery and photographs available on Web services could help terrorists plan attacks are not new, with reports that terrorists have used such imagery to carry out attacks in Iraq and Israel, and an Indian court is considering a ban on Google Earth following reports that its imagery played a part in the Mumbai terrorist attacks." "Security expert Bruce Schneier recently wondered what other things legislators might consider banning to prevent terrorism: 'Bank robbers have long used cars and motorcycles as getaway vehicles, and horses before then. I haven't seen it talked about yet, but the Mumbai terrorists used boats as well. They also wore boots. They ate lunch at restaurants, drank bottled water and breathed the air,' wrote Schneier. 'Society survives all of this because the good uses of infrastructure far outweigh the bad uses, even though the good uses are — by and large — small and pedestrian and the bad uses are rare and spectacular.'"

40 of 597 comments (clear)

  1. I agree with Bruce by Pope · · Score: 5, Funny

    Ban bottled water, that stuff's a killer!

    --
    It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    1. Re:I agree with Bruce by mcgrew · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ban bottled water, that stuff's a killer!

      No, don't do that! The money they waste on bottled water is money they can't buy guns and bombs and shoes with!

    2. Re:I agree with Bruce by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 5, Funny

      Boycott oxygen!

      99% of all now-dead lifeforms on this planet consumed oxygen for the majority of their lifetime. It is clearly a toxic substance that must be controlled!

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    3. Re:I agree with Bruce by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Boycott oxygen!

      99% of all now-dead lifeforms on this planet consumed oxygen for the majority of their lifetime. It is clearly a toxic substance that must be controlled!

      What about plants?

    4. Re:I agree with Bruce by Cruciform · · Score: 4, Funny

      Chewbacca, Endor.
      Case closed.

    5. Re:I agree with Bruce by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      actually, i once learned in biology that our dependancy on oxygen is one of the reasons we age. apparently, it kills us and keeps us alive because of the same property: it reacts easily.

      something about free radicals..

    6. Re:I agree with Bruce by causality · · Score: 5, Funny

      Boycott oxygen!

      99% of all now-dead lifeforms on this planet consumed oxygen for the majority of their lifetime. It is clearly a toxic substance that must be controlled!

      It's almost as dangerous as dihydrogen monoxide!

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
  2. Why stop online? by gnick · · Score: 5, Funny

    If we just blurred all maps, the terrorists couldn't even find their targets!

    --
    He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    1. Re:Why stop online? by BarryJacobsen · · Score: 5, Funny

      If we just blurred all maps, the terrorists couldn't even find their targets!

      You're thinking too small - if we blurred out our name whenever we talk to them - they wouldn't even know who to attack, let alone find them!

    2. Re:Why stop online? by Iamthefallen · · Score: 5, Funny

      Silly, just blur the terrorist bases and let the problem solve itself.

      --
      Wax-Museum Fire Results In Hundreds Of New Danny DeVito Statues
    3. Re:Why stop online? by GMFTatsujin · · Score: 5, Funny

      I don't believe in the second world war.

      That doesn't stop the second world war from believing in me, though.

    4. Re:Why stop online? by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      ... no one will remember their people being oppressed and their country impoverished by capitalist assholes.

      Excellent! They will only remember being oppressed by those other assholes, and we capitalists can have free play and even look like the good guys by selling protection!

    5. Re:Why stop online? by agrippa_cash · · Score: 4, Funny

      Apparently in England there was a sign that said "Welcome to _____________ on ____________, Birthplace of William Shakespeare." Good thing the Nazis didn't have Wikipedia.

    6. Re:Why stop online? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Better idea: instead of blurring, let's just put great big X's on the buildings we don't want them to target. Who would ever target a building that's been Xed out?

    7. Re:Why stop online? by blg42 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Blur out all Starbucks. The terrorists will quickly run out of resources trying to attack them all...

    8. Re:Why stop online? by Samah · · Score: 3, Funny

      I have a better idea, let's blur real life! That way the terrorists couldn't even see their targets!

      --
      Homonyms are fun!
      You're driving your car, but they're riding their bikes there.
    9. Re:Why stop online? by couchslug · · Score: 2, Funny

      "If we just blurred all maps, the terrorists couldn't even find their targets!"

      That's clearly insufficient, because old maps could still be used.

      We should invalidate the maps by blurring the world instead.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    10. Re:Why stop online? by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 2, Funny

      Help! Help! I'm being repressed!!

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
    11. Re:Why stop online? by fractoid · · Score: 2, Funny

      My 'real life' is already blurred, you insensitive clod! I've been reading slashdot at -3.25 diopters for years...

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    12. Re:Why stop online? by iminplaya · · Score: 2, Funny

      You forgot hands. Yes hands, and brains. They might not show it, but terrorists use brains too. All memories should be blurred. Mine are.

      --
      What?
    13. Re:Why stop online? by fractoid · · Score: 2, Funny

      KILL ZEM ALL!

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    14. Re:Why stop online? by MindPhlux · · Score: 2, Funny

      I was viewing Moscow the other day on Google Earth and thinking what a wonderful world we live in. An open world, more free than we were back then.

      Woah woah woah, why on earth were you planning to bomb Moscow???

    15. Re:Why stop online? by Scarletdown · · Score: 3, Funny

      Why not just follow the lead of one particular town right there in California?

      Chico has a law on the books declaring a $500 fine for detonating a nuclear device within the city limits. It apparently has been a decent deterrent, since no nuke has been detonated within Chico, California.

      --
      This space unintentionally left blank.
    16. Re:Why stop online? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Any time they needed to turn, they'd drop off a soldier at the intersection, and he'd then direct everyone else and get back into the last vehicle of the convoy. This would be repeated over and over until they reached their destination

      For any realistic journey, they must have needed a lot of troops, and last truck must have been frickin' huge. Unless of course the last truck was actually The Tardis in disguise.

    17. Re:Why stop online? by geminidomino · · Score: 2, Funny

      I want 5 MW by mid-May.

  3. Yep. by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 5, Funny

    Terr'st1: "Are you ready to hit the school and strike a blow against the evil US?"
    Terr'st2: "Yes! We must stand up against the Great Satan!"
    Terr'st1: "Good! Grab the map."
    Terr'st2: "It's... it's blurred! This cannot be!"
    Terr'st1: "Curses! We are foiled."
    Terr'st2: "You outsmarted us this time Great Satan! But we will be back."

    --
    If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
    1. Re:Yep. by dacut · · Score: 3, Funny

      Wouldn't the terrorists just use the unblur and image enhancement filters that I see on CSI and other fine TV shows? We'll need to outlaw that, as well.

      (And by "that," I'm not sure if I mean the "technology" or CSI itself...)

  4. Welcome to California!!! by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1, Funny

    Yeah, we know how to pick our politicians here in California. The total IQ of our state legislature is about 3. Dumbest asses ever. All of them. Republicans. Democrats. Whatever. I think Sacramento has something in the water.

    1. Re:Welcome to California!!! by Pope · · Score: 5, Funny

      I think Sacramento has something in the water.

      Must have been those damn terrorists!

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
  5. Re:on other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Politicians have called for a ban on cars since they are used for bank robberies.

    Nobody's suggesting anything that extreme. We just want to blur all the windscreens so as to slow down any getaways. I suppose you'd rather have terrorists?

  6. Re:Priorities by Locke2005 · · Score: 4, Funny

    In fact, a really good terrorist attack would cut down on the demand for water and electricity, and make things much better for the remaining Californians! Are you listening, Al Qaeda? Attacking California could only make the situation there better, not worse!

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  7. Help Google Identify the Targets by flaming+error · · Score: 5, Funny

    So that California doesn't have to update Google whenever soft targets change, I propose that California paint the roofs of sensitive locations fluorescent orange, then add satellite-visible concentric black circles to clearly indicate to Google that the building is a target.

    California could also inform Google of the site's importance, by painting a large black number representing a score from 1-10.

    Then, just in case the terrorists still find the place, outside the site we should post a large warning sign saying "Terrorism Prohibited at this Site."

  8. Lightning rods on steeples by Overzeetop · · Score: 2, Funny

    Each time I see a steeple with a lightning rod, I wonder about substantial lack of faith on the part of the congregation.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  9. Revisit other legislation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    If they want everything blurred, why did they outlaw dope?

  10. At least blur them during school days by janwedekind · · Score: 5, Funny

    Reminds me of a German politician who suggested an innovative solution against kids browsing porn: Porn sites must be offline until 10 pm!

  11. What politians think is not the problem. by SupremoMan · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's the fact they always seem to say everything they think.

  12. Re:When maps are outlawed by Phoenixhawk · · Score: 2, Funny

    Ed Gooberman, you fail to grasp Tae-Kwon Leep. Approach me so that you may see.

    Boot to the Head

    You are lucky Ed Gooberman. Few novices experiece so much of Tae-Kwon Leep so soon.

  13. Meanwhile, in the air above california! by TinBromide · · Score: 4, Funny

    Terrorist 1: Ok, i've printed out this map of the target, its a middleschool attended by 400 kids, if we crash a plane into it, we might be able to take half of it out and maybe kill 200 of the great satan's young.

    Terrorist 2: Excellent, since we've taken over this plane in a post 9/11 environment where the average person who flies in a plane believes that if a terrorist takes over the plane, their lives are forfeit anyway, they had no problem revolting and attempting to kill us.

    Terrorist 1: Yeah, that was rough, thanks be that we had our bottles of water to fight them off.

    Terrorist 2: Don't forget our nail clippers and cuticle scissors! Anyway, I think our target should be over there, that's elm street. Aim between the soccer field and the baseball diamond.

    Terrorist 1: Wait! That looks nothing like the picture! Its not blurred out like in the print out!

    Terrorist 2: Drat, foiled again, CURSE YOU JOEL ANDERSON!!!!

    --
    Is it sad that I am more likely to recognize you and your posts by your sig than your name or UID?
  14. Re: Meme! by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1, Funny

    In A.D. 2101
            War was beginning.
            Captain: What happen ?
            Mechanic: Somebody set up us the bomb.
            Operator: We get signal.
            Captain: What !
            Operator: Main screen turn on.
            Captain: It's you !!
            Terr'st1: How are you gentlemen !!
            Terr'st1: All your **MAPS** are belong to us.
            Terr'st1: You are on the way to destruction.
            Captain: What you say !!
            Terr'st1: You have no chance to survive make your time.
            Terr'st1: Ha ha ha ha ....

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  15. Anyone looked at his site? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Wow, it is just amazing he has another issue to talk on. His site is great, under the heading of My Legislation: "There are no data records to display." The same is true with his Issue Positions. Of course having grown up in San Diego next to this guy's districts he looks and sounds just like the stereotypes for those he represents. I wonder if he owns a trailer.