Slashdot Mirror


Nvidia Mulls Cheap, Integrated x86 Chip

CWmike writes "Nvidia is considering developing an integrated chip based on the x86 architecture for use in devices such as netbooks and mobile Internet devices, said Michael Hara, vice president of investor relations at Nvidia during a speech that was webcast from the Morgan Stanley Technology Conference this week. Nvidia has already developed an integrated chip called Tegra, which combines an Arm processor, a GeForce graphics core and other components on a single chip. The chips are aimed at small devices such as smartphones and MIDs, and will start shipping in the second half of this year. 'Tegra, by any definition, is a complete computer-on-chip, and the requirements of that market are such that you have to be very low power and very small but highly efficient,' Hara said. 'Someday, it's going to make sense to take the same approach in the x86 market as well.'"

17 of 211 comments (clear)

  1. Prediction.. by pak9rabid · · Score: 5, Funny

    Nvidia develops a very basic x86 CPU thats tightly coupled to one of their embedded GPUs that doesn't implement any x86 technology that's still currently patent-protected. The basic x86 CPU acts as a shim for software that expects to talk to an x86 CPU and offloads as much as possible to the significantly more advanced GPU running the bulk of the load. The end result? An x86-compatible embedded system that vastly outperforms anything currently on the market that doesn't violate anyone's active x86 patents.

    1. Re:Prediction.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Wow, do you even know anything about x86?

    2. Re:Prediction.. by larry+bagina · · Score: 4, Funny

      almost as much as he knows about GPUs.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    3. Re:Prediction.. by setagllib · · Score: 4, Funny

      Wow, now all we need is to connect the GPU to the FSB/QPI, make it support pagetables, interrupts, DMA, CPU-style L1/2/3 coherent cache, memory controller with synchronous fencing, legacy and long modes for pointers and instructions, etc.... and then we'll have something that can possibly emulate an x86 CPU at only 99.9% performance penalty!!

      Or, you know, not.

      --
      Sam ty sig.
    4. Re:Prediction.. by mgblst · · Score: 2, Funny

      Not just x86, but this guy clearly doesn't know anything about CPU/GPUs at all. Kinda like an old friend of mine, convinced he was going to design his own CPU, despite not knowing anything about computer hardware. Or even computer software. Sure could play games though, and smoke a lot of dope.

  2. If they bail out, then the headline will by davidsyes · · Score: 4, Funny

    read:

    "Nvidia NULLS Cheap, Integrated x86 Chip "

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
    1. Re:If they bail out, then the headline will by Ninnle+Labs,+LLC · · Score: 3, Funny

      No, you need something more graphics related like "Nvidia Culls Cheap, Integrated x86 Chip".

  3. Re:x86? by pak9rabid · · Score: 2, Funny

    Why botther at all? Better go straight to x64, I mean, even the lowliest of nvidia GPUs is already 64 bits, why bother with 32 bits technology?

    They day an embedded system's CPU needs to address more than 4 gigs of memory (which is essentially why you would shift from a 32-bit to 64-bit CPU) is the day my shit turns purple and smells like rainbow sherbet.

  4. Netbooks? by Hognoxious · · Score: 4, Funny

    You aren't allowed to call them netbooks, didn't you get the subpoena?

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  5. ah gamers... by emj · · Score: 5, Funny

    My Intel 855GM handles xterms very well, recently they have become very wobbly slimey when I drag them around in Gnome, other than that everything is fine with my integrated chip.

  6. Re:oh god, please no. by nedlohs · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yes, because what I want to do is slot a PCIe card into my damn cell phone.

  7. Re:x86? by bruno.fatia · · Score: 4, Funny

    not only that but what exactly do you think your handheld/phone is going to do with more than 4 gig of ram per process?

    Nothing as 640k is enough for any phone.

  8. Can you just imagine?! by Phizzle · · Score: 4, Funny

    A Beowu.... aww fuck it.

    --
    I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.
  9. Re:I don't see the point. by hawk · · Score: 4, Funny

    >Finally, such an approach means that the base layers can be the
    >same whether the top layer is x86, ARM, PPC, Sparc or a walrus.

    So much for running linux on it!


    BIOS ERROR.
    NO OPERATING SYSTEM FOUND.
    THE WALRUS HAS EATEN THE PENGUIN.

    hawk

  10. Re:x86? by Spit · · Score: 2, Funny

    x86 is more than x64, so it's better right?

    --
    POKE 36879,8
  11. Re:oh god, please no. by timeOday · · Score: 2, Funny

    Fine, but I refuse to use any newfangled CPU that has integrated cache memory and can't harness the power of my math coprocessor.

  12. Re:x86? by MrMr · · Score: 2, Funny

    No that was last time, when his shit turned its current color.
    Get back to him in a couple of years for something really weird.