Slashdot Mirror


UK Company Sold Workers' Secret Data

krou writes "The BBC is reporting that the Information Commissioner's Office has shut down a company in the UK for a serious breach of the Data Protection Act. It claims that the company, The Consulting Association in Droitwich, Worcs, ran a secret system that it repeatedly denied existed for 15 years, selling workers' confidential data, including union activities, to building firms, allowing potential employers to unlawfully vet job applicants. About 3,213 workers were in the database, and other information included data on personal relationships, political affiliations, and employment histories. More than 40 firms are believed to have used the service, paying a £3,000 annual fee, and each of them will be investigated, too." The article says that The Consulting Association faces a £5,000 fine — after pulling in £1.8 million over 15 years with its illegal blacklist.

16 of 122 comments (clear)

  1. 5k fine, 1.8M in profits by KiloByte · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's kind of hard to say "continue, please" louder than by slapping such an enormous fine.

    --
    The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    1. Re:5k fine, 1.8M in profits by Shakrai · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's kind of hard to say "continue, please" louder than by slapping such an enormous fine.

      What are the odds of the employers who illegally used said database being fined or punished in some way? Punish the people who used the database and you'll find that the next time someone offers up illegal information for sale they'll have a much harder time finding customers.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    2. Re:5k fine, 1.8M in profits by Hatta · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Let us know when it actually happens.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  2. much bigger damage to society by pmarini · · Score: 5, Insightful

    surely the damage done over 15 years to the families of those not employed because of this illegal practice is much bigger than £1.8mln...

    --
    Can I put a spell on those who can't spell?
    Your wheels are loose and they're losing their grip, good you're there.
    1. Re:much bigger damage to society by filekutter · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree with you totally pmarini. Unfortunately this is just the proverbial iceberg tip, with much more still hidden. These are corporations whose activities the last few decades since Reagan have centered on removal of restrictions, merging of interests with national law, and abolition through demonization of unions.

      --
      I call computer-illiteracy job security
    2. Re:much bigger damage to society by dkleinsc · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Even if they agreed to a background check, they probably didn't agree to be checked for activities that aren't in any way illegal or reflecting on job performance, such as (FTFA) "ex-shop steward" or "Irish ex-Army".

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
  3. This is an old, old blacklist by ab8ten · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This blacklist was specifically for the construction industry - for those who haven't RTFA. The terrible thing is that this list, and its sale for money, has been around for years and years. It's the industry's dirty little secret. It's only now they've computerised the records that they can use the Data Protection Act to prosecute. Sadly, I have no doubt that the information will live on somehow. All the major players have fingers in the pie and won't give it up, I think.

    --
    I have no .sig
    1. Re:This is an old, old blacklist by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ....please get your facts straight

      Facts? We don't need facts. This is the Internet!

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
  4. British Paranoia at its finest! by ringbarer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Let me get this right:

    British Employers are paranoid that potential employees are Communists or worse. They subscribe to a secret blacklist that potentials have no knowledge of or ability to refute allegations. Anyone blacklisted will not be employed, but the work still needs to be done.

    So they draft in cheap labor from countries that didn't even exist twenty years ago. As these migrant workers aren't on the blacklist, they get cherry picked for work that local labor should have the same rights to apply for. The end result being the rise of local unemployment through no fault of the workers.

    No wonder their economy is fucked.

    --
    "Why did they cancel my favorite Sci-Fi show? I downloaded ALL the episodes!"
    1. Re:British Paranoia at its finest! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Translation: I'd prefer to employ illegal immigrants because if they complain about dangerous working conditions or being paid less than minimum wage, I can just have them deported rather than doing something about the problem.

  5. Re:I'm confused by jandersen · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Does your government sell information about your political activities etc to a cabal of semi-criminals? No? Well, there you have your answer, then.

    Just because you have an ingrown bias that tells that "Everthing the government does is evil, and everything a private business does is sort of OK, even if it is criminal" doesn't mean that it makes sense. You would probably benefit from taking off your blinkers once in a while.

  6. Re:Put on your Republican/Tory shoes for a second by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    You mean other than the fact that blacklists like that database are illegal?

    If you rely on the law for your morals then you have no morals at all.

  7. Re:I'm confused by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Governments can be held accountable for their actions.

    Really? What country do you live in? I'd like to move there.

    --
    "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
  8. solution: by Anonymous+Admin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Charge them with 3213 instances and fine them per instance. The profit disappears and so does the motivation.

  9. Re:sounds like the work of a genius by prefect42 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A more correct google gives:

    UK: 59
    US: 1186

    --

    jh

  10. Re:sounds like the work of a genius by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Highly variable, I suspect.

    Illiterate undocumented immigrant getting paid 80 pence an hour to carry a hod? Probably not.

    Skilled tradesman who happens to have political opinions pinker than his boss would like? Quite possibly(especially the web stuff).

    Access to legal options, unfortunately, is very much a game for the wealthy; but the interwebs are pretty far downmarket these days.