Slashdot Mirror


Apple Mac Mini 1TB Upgrade — Not Easy But Possible

designperfection9 writes "The new Mac mini is all well and good, but anybody hoping for gobfuls of extra capacity will come away disappointed. Apple's entry-level mini gets 120GB of storage, and it costs $175 to take that up the official 320GB maximum. Happily iFixit decided to step in and take matters into their own hands, with a nine-page pictorial guide to fitting your Mac mini with 1TB of storage." They're also offering a kit to accomplish the same end for $250 — that seems high to me now that 1TB external drives can be had for quite a bit less, and require no putty-knife action to install.

23 of 95 comments (clear)

  1. I hate when submitters do this... by wolrahnaes · · Score: 5, Informative

    The summary says the actual content is on iFixit, but the link goes to some useless blog which then links to iFixit.

    Link directly to the content, include a via link if you want to reference where you got the link from.

    For the record, the proper article URL where the actual content is follows:
    http://www.ifixit.com/Guide/Repair/Mac-mini-A1283-Terabyte-Drive/660/1

    --
    I used to get high on life, but I developed a tolerance. Now I need something stronger.
    1. Re:I hate when submitters do this... by pushing-robot · · Score: 3, Funny

      I hate when submitters do this...the link goes to some useless blog which then links to iFixit.

      They do it in remembrance of Roland, you insensitive clod!

      --
      How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
  2. Why am I not surprised? by PhasmatisApparatus · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The amount of work involved in upgrading a Mac has, usually, been excessive. Probably the worst example of this are the old PowerPC-based Macintoshes like the Performa 6400. The case was made from layer upon layer of plastic and metal panels that each snapped, screwed, or slid into place in ridiculous ways. I always wondered why they even bothered to include PCI slots on these machines, when it was such a pain to get to them.

    1. Re:Why am I not surprised? by CompMD · · Score: 2, Informative

      What about the G3/G4 towers? Those are some of the easiest to work on machines out there. Pull the lever, lower the side of the case, tada! Easy to change drives, PCI cards, CPU, and memory. These were probably the best built Macs ever.

    2. Re:Why am I not surprised? by UnknowingFool · · Score: 4, Insightful

      *Sigh* The MacMini was/is not meant to be upgraded. If you want an upgradeable machine, don't buy a MacMini. Complaining that take it takes an excessive amount of work to upgrade it is like complaining that it takes a massive amount of work to make a MiniCooper pull a boat.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    3. Re:Why am I not surprised? by DLWormwood · · Score: 2, Informative

      The amount of work involved in upgrading a Mac has, usually, been excessive.

      This has only been true historically with the consumer models. The models that Apple designates for "professional" usually upgrade much easier. My current G5 has full access from a side door (as well as the current Mac Pro line) and even my old LC and 4400 had easily accessible PDS and PCI slots when the case is slid off. (My iMac G4 was the only machine I had I couldn't upgrade myself.) It's just that, as the "ease of use" brand in the industry, Apple's more famous machines are the all-in-one and laptop units that have the more cramped assembly and design.

      --
      Those who complain about affect & effect on /. should be disemvoweled
    4. Re:Why am I not surprised? by doconnor · · Score: 2, Informative

      The trouble is that Apple doesn't sell an upgradable machine unless you get a Mac Pro, which is CAN$2900 and up. If you want a modest Macintosh computer you have no easily upgradable options.

    5. Re:Why am I not surprised? by Solra+Bizna · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I have had to restore from a Time Machine backup and I will never use it again. It was so much work because it does not backed up most of the system and ---

      Whoah, whoah, whoah. Hold it right there. By default, Time Machine backs up every single file on the hard disk. If you were cheap enough to deliberately exclude system directories, you should expect that a full restore is going to be less than painless.

      Not only that, but doesn't it pop up a scary warning dialog if you exclude system dirs?

      -:sigma.SB

      --
      WARN
      THERE IS ANOTHER SYSTEM
  3. Re:Hard Disk out, hard disk in by wolrahnaes · · Score: 4, Informative

    The Mac Mini takes notebook hard drives. They only go up to 500GB right now. Getting 1TB requires removing the optical drive, which now with this generation is SATA so it's actually compatible with decent-sized hard drives.

    --
    I used to get high on life, but I developed a tolerance. Now I need something stronger.
  4. Firewire and USB by truthsearch · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Or just plug in an external drive. I use an external firewire drive and it performs extremely well. Use a mobile drive and you won't need an extra power source, either. I don't see the need to upgrade the internal drive.

    1. Re:Firewire and USB by Phroggy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Or just plug in an external drive. I use an external firewire drive and it performs extremely well. Use a mobile drive and you won't need an extra power source, either. I don't see the need to upgrade the internal drive.

      In fact, you can get something like these, so your external drive fits precisely underneath the Mac mini. I don't know if any of these support FireWire 800 yet, but obviously new versions will (the new revision of Mac mini has a FireWire 800 [IEEE1394b] port; previous models had FireWire 400 [IEEE1394a]). An external enclosure can use a faster, cheaper, and larger capacity 3.5" drive, so there's pretty much no downside, unless that extra inch and a half of vertical space is really that important to you.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    2. Re:Firewire and USB by Pope · · Score: 2, Informative

      MiniStack 3 came out a couple of years back: http://www.newertech.com/products/ministackv3.php
      eSATA, FW800 and FW400, USB 2.0.

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
  5. Uh, why? by pushing-robot · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I could kind of understand this back when the Mini only had USB and FW400. Now that they have FW800—why bother? What does anyone use a Mini for that requires 100MB/s+ transfer rates?

    --
    How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
    1. Re:Uh, why? by pushing-robot · · Score: 2, Insightful

      SATA is 3Gb/s max, FW800 is 0.8Gb/s max.

      And the 2.5" 10000RPM VelociRaptor is faster (in most respects) than any 3.5" HD out there.

      --
      How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
  6. putty-knife action by Phu5ion · · Score: 3, Funny

    Anything worth doing, is worth doing with a little putty-knife action.

    --
    Slashdot is kind of like Playboy; we aren't here to read the articles.
  7. Pimp my karma... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    And here's the content in PDF format in case you want to keep it for later reference: http://www.ifixit.com/pdf/guide_660_en.pdf

  8. Re:But you lose the optical drive! by CortoMaltese · · Score: 2, Funny

    Why would you ever want to do this?

    You must be new here. Did you buy that three-digit id or what? ;-)

  9. Mini Form-Factor Drives by Eravau · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'm not sure what the point is when you can keep the same desktop footprint with one of the many stackable external drives that have been manufactured with a Mini form factor. There's a list of links on a post here.

    1. Re:Mini Form-Factor Drives by Chris+Tucker · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "I'm not sure what the point is..."

      Some people like to open their machines and fiddle with them, adding their own RAM, installing larger harddrives, overclocking the CPU, etc.

      They're called"hardware hackers".

      Sometimes, it's done simply to save a little money. Sometimes it's done for the fun of messing around with the hardware.

      As the folks from MAKE magazine say, "If you can't open it, you don't own it!"

      --
      Guaranteed! This comment 100% Anthrax free!
    2. Re:Mini Form-Factor Drives by Eravau · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hacks that add functionality I get. I guess I just don't see the point of this hack when you're removing capabilities (all optical drive functions) for very little (if any) real gain. I guess if you never need optical drive access again (have fun with those software installs) then this would be fine... but I don't see it being worth anything... unless you get your jollies from doing it "just because you can" as UnknowingFool said above.

  10. Re:But you lose the optical drive! by Nick+Ives · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Well, I appreciate it in the cool "I've got more money and free time than sense" aspect of pointlessly modifying hardware, I just don't have that much free time.

    A computer the size of a Mac Mini with that much storage space is basically a media-centre. If you're prepared to spend time with tools then you might as well build it yourself; if you want OS X build a hackintosh.

    And yes, this is my UID. I signed up on the day user accounts were announced. It was quite controversial at the time (Oh noes! Wot about are privacies!!) but was necessary because people were abusing the honour system and pretending to be other people.

    --
    Nick
  11. Re:Step 19: Solder each pair of wires [snip] by Hijacked+Public · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Oh no, soldering!

    Invited off my lawn is anyone who considers soldering 2 wires together 'ridiculous'.

    --
    "Sacrifice for the good of The State" - The State
  12. Re:Step 19: Solder each pair of wires [snip] by vitaflo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Invited off my lawn is anyone who considers soldering 2 wires together 'ridiculous'.

    It's ridiculous when you consider it's unnecessary. A wire butt connector and a crimp tool is a much faster and easier solution than soldering. You also don't have to worry about a solder joint breaking when you stuff it back into the thing.