Slashdot Mirror


Google Earth Uncovers Secret UK Nuke Base

thefickler writes "Gone are the days when governments could easily hide top secret bases. These days it's a weekend pastime to see who can find top secret facilities using Google Earth. Now it's the UK government's turn to be outraged after a secret facility was revealed by a British tabloid. The facility is said to be located in Faslane on the River Clyde in Scotland. This nuclear base was previously blurred out by the request of the British Government. However, with the latest update provided via Google Earth, many of the blurred out locations were accidentally revealed." Update: 3/08 at 14:24 by SS: Multiple readers have pointed out that the issue here is not the location of the base — it's simply that details of buildings and objects within the base (such as the location of a pair of nuclear submarines) are accidentally visible after the UK government specifically requested they be blurred out.

8 of 240 comments (clear)

  1. "Also revealed are MI6's London offices" by EWAdams · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Oooh... like that huge bottle-green and cream building with all the satellite dishes on top was invisible to the tens of thousands of commuters who pass by it on the railroad every day.

    Everybody knows where these things are anyway. The newspapers are just having a slow day, so let's take another whack at technology/Google/the Internet.

    --
    I piss off bigots.
    1. Re:"Also revealed are MI6's London offices" by Z00L00K · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And who in their right mind thinks that a foreign nation doesn't already know the existence, location and layout of various bases around the world?

      Some bribes or joint ventures later and information exceeding the information available at Google Earth is widespread.

      Blurring a satellite or air photo today is just a giveaway since two different distributions never have the same blurring and that tells others that this is a site of interest.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    2. Re:"Also revealed are MI6's London offices" by tomhudson · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What the gov't is pissed off about is that you can see 2 nuclear subs docked ... scroll up to the top of the bay, zoom in.

      Sure, foreign governments probably already have assets on the ground keeping watch of the ebb and flow of traffic, but it's nice to have visible confirmation (you can confirm the date of the pictures by using shadows - every day, the shadows will be slightly different as the sun appears to trace a slightly different arc in the sky).

    3. Re:"Also revealed are MI6's London offices" by 1u3hr · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Sure, foreign governments probably already have assets on the ground keeping watch of the ebb and flow of traffic

      Any foreign government with an interest in this information HAS IT'S OWN SURVEILLANCE SATELLITES. They are not going to use Google, which can be months out of date, when they can get real time images. Even Iran has the capacity to launch these now. And anyone else can just pay a small fee to one of several commercial satellite surveillance services, not all of which are beholden to the UK government.

      Of course, TFA talks about "terrorists" targeting the subs with rockets. Right. Could terrorists get that kind of weapon into the UK and close to a nuclear weapons installation? I find it hard to believe. But there is an infinite number of soft targets they could hit with greater hope of doing damage and less risk.

    4. Re:"Also revealed are MI6's London offices" by tomhudson · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Afghanistan is currently in no danger of a strategic nuclear attack, which is obviously the main reason countries which have them go to some lengths to make sure their nuclear sub fleet is concealed

      Wrong. The day you have to actually launch a strategic nuclear attack is the day that your nuclear submarine fleets' actual purpose - which is to be enough of a threat to retaliate in the event of such an attack (see Mutually Assured Destruction) - is over. The submarine fleet will have failed in its' primary goal, which is to be a credible enough threat to PREVENT a nuclear attack.

      The nuclear submarine fleet's second purpose is to protect the rest of the naval fleet, allies, and shipping, both by being the "joker in the hole" against other forces, and against other subs.

      The third purpose is, as I've mentioned elsewhere, to do stand-off attacks via cruise missiles, which they (UK submarines) HAVE launched against targets in Afghanistan.

  2. Blurred out by request by Baron_Yam · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Doesn't that just mean that a whole chain of people at Google now know the location is sensitive and could turn around and pass on that information?

    If they ask to have it Photoshopped into non-existence then you know you've got really hot property!

  3. OK, where to begin. by Samschnooks · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Some of the other locations revealed are MI6â(TM)s London offices, Britainâ(TM)s nuclear crisis HQ and the SAS training facility. Apparently the UK Government is worried that terrorists could potentially launch missile attacks to those target areas with the exact coordinates readily available on the Internet.

    So, the UK Government is actually saying, "Oops! You got us! That's exactly what they are! As matter of act, those buildings are exactly what you think they are and then some! What what! Cheers!"

    Could these buildings be not very important and the UK gov is making them seem more important to distract everyone from the real targets? I don't see anything that makes that facility ultra secure like you'd expect for someplace that is that sensitive. Look how close it is to the highway (A814)? Here in the States, there'd be a HUGE driveway or access road so that someone couldn't just park at the side and lob a mortar shell over or what have you.

    A tabloid said this? A PRINTED tabloid that will do anything to increase circulation; especially in this economy?!?

    I could go on but I'm sick of typing.

  4. Well since big brother can be watching us... by 3seas · · Score: 3, Insightful

    .....so can us little brothers be watching big brother... No double standards here.

    Of the 6 plus billion people on this planet, it is some fraction of 1% that messes things up for the rest of us.
    Its about time we start watching them..