Slashdot Mirror


Hitachi Fined $31 Million For LCD Price Fixing

MojoKid writes "The Japanese electronics manufacturer has just agreed to pay a staggering $31 million fine for its role in a conspiracy to fix prices in the sale of TFT-LCD panels sold to Dell, Inc. The United States Department of Justice made the proclamation, and details show that Hitachi has plead guilty to a one-count felony. The charge, which was filed in the U.S. District Court in San Francisco, blames Hitachi Displays Ltd., a subsidiary of Hitachi Ltd., with 'participating in a conspiracy to fix the prices of TFT-LCD sold to Dell for use in desktop monitors and notebook computers from April 1, 2001 through March 31, 2004.'"

20 of 135 comments (clear)

  1. Fixed which way? by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 3, Interesting

    High or low? I guess it would be "dumping" if low...

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
  2. How Much? by Rik+Rohl · · Score: 5, Insightful

    did they make more than $31 mil profit by fixing the prices? If they did then they got away with it.

    1. Re:How Much? by justsomecomputerguy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Exactly! It's not like this is going to hurt their reputation in any significant way, so the fines HAVE to be higher than the illicit profits for them to have any real teeth.

    2. Re:How Much? by hardburn · · Score: 4, Informative

      They've also been hit with criminal fines of over $585 million.

      --
      Not a typewriter
  3. Pay $31M, Made $300M by cc_pirate · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Once again a corporation is allowed to steal and not pay back what it stole...

    While an individual would have to pay every DIME back and then pay a penalty on TOP of that...

    Pathetic

    --

    "There are laws that enslave men, and laws that set them free. " - Sean Connery as King Arthur

    1. Re:Pay $31M, Made $300M by Idiomatick · · Score: 4, Insightful

      To be fair companies are people. Punitive charges don't make as much sense. Charging the people who made the decisions punitive amounts does and I believe they have/will do so. Hurting a company of thousands of employees for the actions of 2~3 people is pretty pointless. The people that made the decision will be replaced so it doesn't matter.

    2. Re:Pay $31M, Made $300M by FlyingBishop · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Those jobs might not exist if the company hadn't been price fixing. Lack of significant consequences means a lack of significant laws.

    3. Re:Pay $31M, Made $300M by muszek · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If the worst that can happen to our company is giving back what we stole, we're gonna do the naughty thing.

    4. Re:Pay $31M, Made $300M by Afforess · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The best part, the new LCD screens will cost more because they have to cover "court costs." It's a lose-lose situation for consumers.

      --
      If our elected representatives no longer represent us, do we still live in a Democracy?
  4. Agreed by LingNoi · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The Japanese electronics manufacturer has just agreed to pay....

    How come when companies break the law they get to "agree" on the punishment?

  5. So who's going to gaol?? by femto · · Score: 3, Interesting

    See, that's where it's so unfair to treat companies as people. They get the benefits, but not the downsides. If *I* committed a felony I would go to gaol. A company gets a smack on the wrist and it is business as usual.

    What we need is a gaol for companies. If a person has to lose "X" years of their life by being locked up, why not a company? Being in "gaol" might mean that the company is nationalised for the length of the sentence and all profits go to the government.

    1. Re:So who's going to gaol?? by fractoid · · Score: 3, Funny

      He shoost, he scroes! GAAAAOOOOOOOOOOOLLLLLL!!!

      Using all caps is what you're *meant* to do when someone scores a gaol, silly flitter!

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
  6. Who gets the $31 million? by AlexCorn · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Does the government keep the $31 million, or does it get distributed to those people who bought price-fixed displays? If the government keeps it, do the victims get a tax cut?

    I'd rather a profitable, productive company like Hitachi keep the money than the parasitic government.

    1. Re:Who gets the $31 million? by LoverOfJoy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Don't worry. The $31 million will just barely cover the costs of the lawyers. The government won't see a dime.

  7. Re:Staggering by The+Grim+Reefer2 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    $25 billion in profits last year. Yep, that $31 million fine is staggering.

    Citation please? According to http://investing.businessweek.com/businessweek/research/stocks/earnings/earnings.asp?symbol=6581.T

    Hitachi's revenue for 2008 was 175B yen or $1.8B. Which is not even the net profit, it's the all monies coming in before expenses. This is no where near $25B in profit.

    In fact they made a net profit of 1.5B yen or $129 Million for 2007. $31 million is almost a quarter of their profits for 2007. For 2008(3-08 to 3-09) they are posting a $7.8B loss.

    http://retrenchment-blog.breaking.sg/2009/01/hitachi-cuts-7000-jobs-worldwide/

  8. Which Hitachi? by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 4, Informative

    Remember, this Hitachi is only a small subsidiary of the bigger Hitachi, and mentioned in TFA.

  9. Rights by darkpixel2k · · Score: 4, Funny

    details show that Hitachi has plead guilty to a one-count felony.

    Damn. Poor Hitachi. They just lost their right to vote and carry a gun.

    --
    There's no place like ::1 (I've completed my transition to IPv6)
  10. Short list by sjames · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Does anyone know where I can find the short list of corporations that are not convicted felons?

    It's odd the way that people who would never in a million years do business with an individual with a felony record (would you buy a house from someone convicted of fraud?) keep on sending their cash to three time loser corporations.

  11. Re:Not Smart by eln · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You're right. When the economy is bad, we should let corporations get away with breaking any laws or regulations they want to in order to maintain a healthy profit, thereby maintaining jobs. This is especially important when the economy is bad in large part because we let corporations get away with breaking any laws or regulations they wanted to in order to maintain a healthy profit.

  12. $31m Is Small, Not "Staggering" by meehawl · · Score: 4, Informative

    In 2005, Samsung paid $300m for price fixing. Hynix paid $185m. Infineon paid $160m, and four of its execs went to prison and paid $250,000 each.

    In 2008, LG paid $400m in fines for price fixing. Sharp paid $120m. Chunghwa paid $65m.

    So... $35m. In this context, not very "staggering".

    --

    Da Blog