TomTom Can License FAT Without Violating the GPL
dp619 writes "Capped per-unit royalties make FAT licensing agreements permissible under the GPL, and SD Times has found that Microsoft's public license policy caps royalties at $250k. If the royalties are capped — as they seem to be — TomTom should be able to license FAT without violating the GPL. And if that is the case ... TomTom needs some serious explaining to do as to why they aren't licensing FAT. That said, Microsoft still needs to explain why it just cannot say that folks won't violate the GPL if they license FAT under its terms."
Hmm, seems to be a bit more of an effort to fp and otherwise troll /. just lately. Not quite the heady old days of 20721 (lol craigpanda) but good to see all the same. Think about your breathing.
v 4.50.2
$YodaBSD: src/release/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/yodanotes/9stepprocess.sgml,v 4.50.2 2009/03/12 04:40:45 tsarkon Exp $
All in a d