Cities View Red Light Cameras As Profit Centers
Houston 2600 writes "Chicago could rake in 'at least $200 million' a year — and wipe out the entire projected deficit for 2009 — by using its vast network of redlight and surveillance cameras to hunt down uninsured motorists, aldermen were told today. The system pitched to the City Council's Transportation Committee by Michigan-based InsureNet would work only if insurance companies were somehow compelled to report the names and license plates of insured motorists. That's already happening daily in 13 states, but not here."
But boy is it safe to drive in Denver now. That's the problem with cities getting greedy, they don't see the positive side of their efforts.
Yeah, but it is a tax on the nasty lawbreakers right? Especially those nasty minority lawbreakers or those nasty lawbreakers who happen to drive flashy extravagant cars. Everyone needs to be taxed except me.
Most of the profit centers on the internet are red light district cameras, and very few people complain. I don't see how this is any... ... oh.
Red stoplight cameras. Excuse me.
I agree.
Also, whites shouldn't be business owners. The current economic crisis demonstrates that whites can't be responsible in their business dealings. I don't care if this particular move disproportionately affects whites, if they are the ones disproportionately wrecking the economy.
That's all great. Do you have any citations to back up your assertions?
You have a right to walk upon public highways but not drive? Curious...
"Insurance Lobby figures out how to use local governments as a vehicle to sell more insurance, as well increase the premiums for existing policies....and pass on the cost of the program to the aforementioned local governments and their citizens."
Yay for us! Da economicy is saved!