Slashdot Mirror


Google Returns Chrome To Beta, Touts Speed Boost

CWmike writes "Google yesterday reversed its decision to ditch the beta label from its Chrome browser, saying it is restoring the moniker to some builds to get faster feedback to developers. 'Since we took the 'beta' tag off Google Chrome in December, we've been updating two release channels: developer and stable,' said Brian Rakowski, a Chrome product manager, in a new blog Google kicked off on Tuesday. 'With our latest release, we're re-introducing the beta channel for some early feedback.' The first beta, Chrome 2.0.169.1, includes several new features, said Rakowski, and it boasts a significant speed increase over the current stable version of the browser, 1.0.154.48. According to Google's tests, the beta is 35% faster than the stable build when measured by the SunSpider JavaScript benchmark suite, and 25% faster on the company's own V8 tests." Reader Al notes too that "Google has launched Chrome Experiments, a site where Javascript coders can upload projects that make use of Chrome's speed and processing abilities. The site already features a handful of cool 'experiments' including a balls that jump between browser windows, a gravitationally-challenged version of the Google homepage and a game that runs through nine different browsers. It's cool stuff alright, but some experts wonder whether browser security might be a more important thing to focus on."

4 of 110 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Is it going to come to Linux? by moderatorrater · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What does the platform have to do with evil or not? 90% of the software out there only works on one platform, and surely you're not going to say they're all evil. Chrome is open source and has been from day one; if it doesn't work on another platform, do the work yourself to get it there. As it is, they're releasing for the platform that has far and away the most users and not diluting their development efforts.

  2. Re:Cool Experiments by AKAImBatman · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I looked up the Firefox 3.1b3 experiments in case anyone is interested. Here's the experiment itself:

    https://developer.mozilla.org/samples/video/chroma-key/index.xhtml

    Here's the page explaining the experiment:

    https://developer.mozilla.org/En/Manipulating_video_using_canvas

    Don't let the small video size fool you. I've managed much larger videos thanks to TraceMonkey's high performance. In doing my own experiments, I realized that they shrunk the final product so that areas where the color wasn't being properly replaced (or worse yet, reflections from poor camera technique) wouldn't be as visible.

  3. Re:Hilarious that speed is key evaluation by prockcore · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Speed is SO NOT the key issue anymore. Netbooks prove this

    Netbooks prove the opposite. Throwing hardware at the problem isn't a solution anymore. No one in their right mind is going to run an office suite on a netbook. The browser is the one place where speed and lightweight memory usage *has* been important. That's why netbooks pretty much run browsers and that's it.

  4. Re:Is it going to come to Linux? by nschubach · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You could show your interest and give them an email list of Linux hopefuls...

    http://www.google.com/chrome/intl/en/linux.html

    Who knows, maybe that actually look at the count of email addresses to decide on the proper resources to allocate.

    --
    Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.