Slashdot Mirror


Look Out, Firefox 3 — IE8 Is Back On Top For Now

CWmike writes "Internet Explorer 8 has shipped in its final version and is ready to take on its rivals. Preston Gralla reviewed it and says the latest version of Microsoft's browser leapfrogs its closest competition, Firefox 3, for basic browsing and productivity features — it has better tab handling, a niftier search bar, a more useful address bar, and new tools that deliver information directly from other Web pages and services. IE8 has also been tweaked for security and includes a so-called 'porn mode,' new anti-malware protection, and better ways to protect your privacy. The most noticeable new features? Accelerators and Web Slices. Think of an Accelerator as a mini-mashup that delivers information from another Web site directly to your current browser page. Web Slices deliver changing information from a Web page you're not actively visiting directly to IE8. There's one big problem for many, though. No add-ins, and there doesn't appear to be such an ecosystem on the horizon. So if you're a fan of add-ins and customizing the browser itself, writes Gralla, Firefox is superior. But for the actual browsing experience, IE8 has the upper hand — for now."

32 of 662 comments (clear)

  1. Best attribute by imajinarie · · Score: 5, Funny

    IE's primary function for me will still be as Firefox Downloader 8.0

    1. Re:Best attribute by XaviorPenguin · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Agreed.
      Besides, I think that whoever is using Firefox will continue to use it regardless of what IEX Browser comes out. The people that will be moving to IE8 will be those people that have used are privy to the previous IE Browser incarnations.

      --
      Friends help you move...
      REAL Friends help you move dead bodies... ^_^
    2. Re:Best attribute by MilesAttacca · · Score: 5, Funny

      Telnet? Real men would use SSH instead of telnet, but they wouldn't really be real men, because real men disassemble Ubuntu on a friend's computer, read it, then type the commands in all over again on their own from memory.

      --
      98% of America's teens drink alcohol, smoke, and have sex. Put this in your sig if you like bagels.
    3. Re:Best attribute by lymond01 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I tried the new Chrome 2 Beta which might not be what you're talking about. Definitely not ready for primetime by any means. Slow, clunky feeling, didn't load pages properly, etc. The old Chrome seems okay, except it has a problem rendering popular social networking sites.

      Firefox's memory usage, test shows, is 1/2 that of Chrome or IE 8 with the same 10 tabs open. It has plugins, cooler themes, is very fast, configurable. So if by "better" you mean "faster"...Chrome 1 is pretty quick as long as you don't mind rendering issues. IE 7 I guess I need to disable completely the Phishing feature instead of just Turn it Off because the browser still waits to load pages as if it's considering whether it meets the MS standard of acceptable surfing.

      Firefox works. Works well.

    4. Re:Best attribute by Ambassador+Kosh · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I may dislike IE8 for a lot of reasons but I would not be so quick to pin this one on IE8. The slashdot code base is HORRIBLE. Just look at the html that is being written, I have had problems with this site in konqueror at various times, webkit and opera. Mostly I think they just hack this site until it works in IE6,7 and Firefox and then call it done and don't worry about all the simple bugs in it that should be fixed that would make it work in far more browers.

      Actually I even started blocking some of the javascript on the page because it was slowing it down so much. Sometimes up to 3 seconds before the page would draw because it was waiting on one of those javascript tracking scripts.

      Slashdot is definitely not an example of a remotely well written site. Just test that yourself and validate it.

      --
      Computer modeling for biotech drug manufacturing is HARD! :)
    5. Re:Best attribute by hobo+sapiens · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yes, I'd like to know who the devs are for the /. UI. I like slashdot a lot, but one has to wonder: if slashdot's own code is this bad and the interface is this bad, just how much geek cred does /. have anymore? A geek site should set the standard. Looks like they got some MBAs to redesign this site.

      --
      blah blah blah
  2. Fluff by HunterZ · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Looks like a bunch of fluff. Not even anything about raw performance or memory footprint or standards compliance.

    --
    Arguing about vi versus Emacs is like arguing whether it's better to make fire by rubbing sticks or banging rocks.
    1. Re:Fluff by JCSoRocks · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yeah, what's the point of "better tab handling" and a "niftier search bar" if the results look like crap because it can't render everything properly?

      --
      You are using English. Please learn the difference between loose and lose; they're, there, and their; your and you're.
  3. Add-ins by nizo · · Score: 5, Funny

    [IE8 has] no add-ins, and there doesn't appear to be such an ecosystem on the horizon.

    Never fear; I'm sure there will be plenty soon enough, and they will most likely install themselves! Check here to find out about new ones as they get released.

    1. Re:Add-ins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      they will most likely install themselves

      Such convenience! Verily, IE is superior to Firefox. :P

    2. Re:Add-ins by Araxen · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Add-ins are the "killer app" of the browser for me. I don't think I'll ever switch from Firefox if competing browsers don't have this feature built into it. I just couldn't live without stuff like foxmarks, flagfox, customisegoogle, etc..

      Yeah, IE8 can render pages faster but who really cares when pages render in a matter of seconds in any of the browsers on the market. 1 or 2 second difference means nothing to me. Add-ins mean alot to me and are the defining feature and without them it makes IE an inferior browser to Firefox.

    3. Re:Add-ins by Hurricane78 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Bah. IE's add-ins are literally killer-apps!

      Try to beat that. ^^

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    4. Re:Add-ins by stokessd · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'd bet that a faster render engine WITH ads still loses against a slightly slower one and adblock.

      Sheldon

    5. Re:Add-ins by Camann · · Score: 5, Funny

      IE's add-ins are literally app-killers!

      --
      I can't believe you don't know what a Hasemalphaginnojinglanaporphomism is.
  4. Security? by afidel · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Accelerators and Web Slices both sound like they are big gaping security holes waiting to be exploited.

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    1. Re:Security? by Alphager · · Score: 5, Informative

      You don't seem to understand what Accelerators are. They are additional markup which denotes that additional information can be downloaded on demand by the user. An example would be the map-accelerator: if you mark an adress with the additional markup, a user can right-click on the area and open google maps in an iframe. Nothing automatic, nothing wierd or non-standard. There even exist a firefox-addon for that functionality: http://www.cleeki.com/firefox.html

    2. Re:Security? by clarkn0va · · Score: 5, Funny

      an entire bowel of free after dinner mints

      What a terrible image!

      --
      I am literally 3000 tokens away from the chaotic crossbow --Stephen
  5. The speed of IE 8 let me get first post! by mahsah · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yes, thanks to the new javascript a-

    Well, crap.

  6. Porn Mode? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Will it prevent Sticky Keys from activating?

  7. A quick Google search by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 5, Funny

    1. Click this link: http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=ie8
    2. On the second search result, read the first line of the description.
    3. ...
    4. (Don't) profit!

    --
    Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
  8. Does it adhere to standards? by nine-times · · Score: 5, Insightful

    My first question with every new release of IE is, "How well does it render valid HTML+CSS?"

    Yeah, I don't really care if it's fast and has "Web Accelerators". Will it display properly written pages properly? Are developers going to have to keep putting hacks into their pages to deal with IE quirks? If they aren't adhering to standards, then it's not really worth much.

  9. Re:Firefox will continue to be superior by sadtrev · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Or, Put simply, "No matter how slow it is, at least it has Adblock"

  10. All alone by AKAImBatman · · Score: 5, Funny

    IE8 Is Back On Top For Now

    You know that kid who rushes to the top of the hill, just knowing that he's finally going to win King of the Hill for the first time ever? Then when he gets to the top of the hill, he's elated when he realizes he's at the top... only to realize a few moments later that all the other kids ran up a different hill?

    That's Microsoft.

  11. Re:Firefox will continue to be superior by Aladrin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And NoScript. And greasemonkey. And GMail Manager. And... The list goes on and on and on... Any one of my 'necessary' plugins makes Firefox more desirable than any other browser.

    --
    "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
  12. Re:Firefox will continue to be superior by realmolo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Well, yes.

    And don't forget NoScript.

    The thing is, with Adblock and NoScript, browsing on Firefox *is* faster than on any other browser. A

  13. Re:Firefox will continue to be superior by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 5, Insightful

    But Adblock, NoScript, and Flashblock cause noticeable speed-ups, especially if your Internet connection is lousy.

  14. It's still MSIE ... by hedronist · · Score: 5, Funny

    First, a joke circa 1983: a hardware guy and a software guy (remember, this was 1983) take an HP Unix system to the roof of a 5 story building. They connect a long extension cord, boot it up, and throw it off the roof. There is a resounding crash and they rush down to see the results. "Wow!" shouts the hardware guy, "it's still running!" The software guy shrugs and says, "Yeah, but it's still running HP-UX."

    What's my point? It may be better than previous MSIE attempts, but it is still Microsoft, it's still IE, and it still only runs on Windows. As a web designer the rule is still: make it look right in Firefox, then unbreak it in MSIE{6,7,8}.

  15. Re:Firefox will continue to be superior by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I heard about this great plugin that makes Firefox even faster. It's called "NoHTML." Apparently it breaks some websites tho...

  16. Re:Firefox will continue to be superior by Jason+Quinn · · Score: 5, Insightful

    [Firefox]'s bloated

    Explain to me how Firefox is bloated. Compared to what? Its former self? Other browsers? The executable size of Firefox has been remarkable stable since version 1.0 --- it hovers around the 10MB mark. Just what is the bloat then? Nearly everything in Firefox has a direct browsing application. It is justified to call those features not bloat. The whole "SQLite database is bloat" argument goes out the window about 5 minutes after you start using the awesome bar. Bloat is one of those words that's easy to fling around. What would you get rid of? The plugin system? Look at the other replies to your comment. The crash manager? The tabbed browsing??? Firefox currently has its problems, but bloat is not one of them.

  17. Re:WIN!!!!!! WIN! by Rulian · · Score: 5, Funny

    You clicked the wrong bookmark... 4chan is the one with a 4 leaves clover.

  18. I am not a linux/firefox fanboy by malevolentjelly · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I am not a linux/firefox fanboy, so I am going to assess this browser fairly and try to answer a few questions brought up on this thread. Since I am probably the only user here running Windows by choice, so I consider this a duty. Furthermore, I am an Opera user, so my expectations for speed and performance are totally insane and unreasonable.

    First off, what's wrong:

    * I am using IE 8 to write this comment and I am already missing my integrated spel chekkar.

    * All the fun browser hacks I use to test new browsers are not working still, so the standards support of this release is the same as before. Of course, you won't see too much upper level DOM and advanced CSS on the part of web people actually use.

    * The tabs seem to open really slow, but I believe it is actually process isolating its tabs now. The memory use per tab is about 10-30 mb, which is around if not slightly below where Chrome is on this system.

    * Acid 3: 12/100

    What's right:

    * The page loads are brutally fast- faster than Opera 10 in some cases. For instance, MSNBC and BBC News, two of my favorite sites pop up at crazy speed. However, Slashdot --which is specifically engineered to run poorly on every new release of IE (it's very firefox-quirky)-- comes up quite slowly. When I first saw the page load charts that Microsoft put out, my first response was that there was a good reason Opera wasn't on that chart- but IE did a fantastic job of playing to the most popular websites. Keep this in mind if you are either a facebook user or stalking your kids on facebook.

    * If you only use IE to download firefox, you will be happy to know that the mozilla webpage loads faster on IE than any other browser, firefox included.

    Conclusion:

    The overall interface of the browser is quite nice. If you're used to using Firefox, this is actually much faster and handles its memory better and such. However, Firefox is not a particularly fast or well designed browser. The interface will feel sluggish if you're used to Opera or Chrome. As an Opera user, my idea of browsing the web involves launching through pages at break-neck speed middle-clicking links as I go along and loading about 20-30 tabs at a time. I have a feeling my computer would explode if I did that with IE 8. However, the same could be said for Firefox 3.

    The article is quite correct in saying that this browser is very fast and correct for the real web which most people browse- and that's something that should be noted. It seems as though Firefox has gotten so obsessed with javascript benchmarks and other such fluff that it's let its real world performance slide to the extent that it's now being challenged by IE.

    Since IE is still totally unchallenged by other browsers in terms of enterprise features like advanced group policy, this new release of IE will simply mean that browsing the web at work/school will be a lot less lame and obnoxious... but considering the state of the economy, you should be all be working very very hard right now.

    If you have any questions or challenges for IE 8 and don't run windows or ie 8, let me know and I will give you the results.

     

  19. Re:Fault! by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 5, Funny

    1. "Detect MS Enemy"
    2. "IfEnemy ScrewUpSiteLoad"

    Examples:
    A. Slashdot, the leading forum for Linux promotion
    B. Google Gears Installed = IE8 hoses pages.

    Wheee!

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine