Slashdot Mirror


Want a Science Degree In Creationism?

The Bad Astronomer writes "In Texas, a state legislator wants the ironically-named Institute for Creation Research to be able to grant a Masters degree in science. In fact, the bill submitted to the Texas congress would make it legal for any private group calling themselves educational to be able to grant advanced degrees in science. So, now's your chance: that lack of a PhD in Astrology and Alchemy won't hold you back any longer." The Institute for Creation Research made a similar request to the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board last year, but were shot down.

6 of 848 comments (clear)

  1. Re:That's Fine With Me by unlametheweak · · Score: 1, Troll

    I may be "PWNED", but you didn't answer my question. You did give me a Google list of art colleges, etc.

  2. Re:That's Fine With Me by dov_0 · · Score: 0, Troll

    A "science" degree in creationism certainly isn't a degree in science. There is no way I would ever hire anyone with such a degree. If anything, I would see them as potentially being very disruptive in the workplace.

    Why not? Same facts and figures coming out of the research done. Same methods. Just a different set of biases used in interpreting the data. At least Creationists acknowledge their bias. Other scientists just call their 'theories' to be 'fact'.

    --
    sudo mount --milk --sugar /cup/tea /mouth /etc/init.d/relax start
  3. Re:That's Fine With Me by unlametheweak · · Score: 1, Troll

    People with religious agendas should not mark Trolls Insights and Informative:

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1170155&cid=27278273
    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1170155&cid=27278335

    And they should not mark my informative posts Troll:
    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1170155&cid=27278305
    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1170155&cid=27278373

    because (1) You are making yourself look foolish and reactionary
    (2) You are wasting perfectly good moderation points

    Also. If you are still here. Mark this post Troll as well. I will certainly do my best to help you get rid of your Mod points so that you won't abuse them with other people's posts.

  4. Re:That's Fine With Me by darkpixel2k · · Score: 1, Troll

    This is exactly as informed and insightful an understanding of evolution as Ben Stein's description of "lightning striking a puddle of mud."

    In other words, it's not actually about evolution, and it's also an incredibly poor understanding of abiogenesis.

    How did life start on earth? I've heard a lot of different 'non-God' views--lightning strike, perfect chance meeting of various bits of 'life goo', etc... But no one seems to be able to reduce the problem further. What created the earth? Ok, what created the universe? Ok, what created the big bang, etc...

    Eventually, it boils down to "We're not sure".
    In other words, there's no proof of how it happened.

    The same can be said somewhat of religion. If God created the heavens and the earth, what created God?

    Ultimately, no one really cares what irrational beliefs you hold -- the vast majority of scientists are religious. The important point is to understand the difference between an unfounded belief and actual science.

    I didn't state a belief on scientists being religious or not. I agree with you that people need to understand the difference between an unfounded *belief* and scientific *proof*.

    Unfortunately it goes both ways. Take the global warming debate for instance. Some people are flat out certain the oceans will be boiling in 10 years. Others have debunked that claim. And yet others have debunked the debunkers. Hell--I remember when carbon dating was considered absolute proof--then they figured out they were off by quite and bit and had to re-estimate everything again.

    Don't be too quick to jump on the "it's proven" bandwagen.

    --
    There's no place like ::1 (I've completed my transition to IPv6)
  5. Re:That's Fine With Me by unlametheweak · · Score: 0, Troll

    My above post was NOT a Troll. Who keeps up-modding the Trolls that, for example state that "I just SMOKED YOU BITCH!!!" when these posts just give red-herring and bogus links along with their insults? ... It does nothing for the cause of religion. What it does do is just make the religious agenda appear more fanatical to neutral parties.

    I will keep on exposing you religious nuts for what you are. Are you going to mod this post a Troll as well?

  6. Re:That's Fine With Me by unlametheweak · · Score: 0, Troll

    You obviously have a lot of religious friends who will moderate you up and moderate all my posts down. But that just means that YOU lose, because it exposes your community for what it is. You can moderate me down (again) because you know that I am Insightful. The Truth shall set me Free. I become stronger with every down mod.