Slashdot Mirror


iiNet Pulls Out of Australian Censorship Trial

taucross writes "ISP iiNet today confirmed its exit from the Australian government's Internet filtering trials. iiNet had originally taken part in the plan in order to prove the filter was flawed. Citing a number of concerns, their withdrawal leaves only five Australian ISPs continuing to test the filter."

4 of 77 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Still 5 too many! by zobier · · Score: 5, Informative
    --
    Me lost me cookie at the disco.
  2. Re:Only 5 Aussie ISPs left? by Alicat1194 · · Score: 5, Informative

    According to TFA, it leaves Primus Telecommunications, Tech 2U, Webshield, OMNIconnect, Netforce and Highway 1. Not exactly what you'd call heavily-populated ISPs.

    --
    You can learn a lot about a person if you just take the time to inject them with sodium pentathol
  3. Article correction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    "their withdrawal leaves only five Australian ISPs continuing to test the filter."

    Correction; There were, and remain, six participating ISP's in the trial; Primus Telecommunications, Tech 2U, Webshield, OMNIconnect, Netforce and Highway 1

    Iinet have only withdrawn their application to participate in the trial.

    To put it in perspective, Optus, the second largest ISP still has an (as yet unaccepted) application to participate. iiNet is the third largest ISP. Primus is possibly in the top 20 ISP's in the country, and the other 5 might sneak into the top 200. There are no other notable publicly known applications from other ISP's

  4. Re:This isn't a technical problem for the governme by frglrock · · Score: 5, Informative

    Nick Xenophon has gone a little bit past having "lost interest" previously stating his opposition to the filter. He has also stated he isn't convinced the trial should go ahead in its current form:

    http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2009/02/27/2503830.htm?site=local

    "But I think the means of doing it really are very problematic and when ISP after ISP [are] saying that this won't work, it will slow down the internet for everyone, and it won't deal with the issue of the peer to peer networks that paedophiles use, then I think we really need to rethink this."

    More importantly though, you seem to be under the impression that Conroy doesn't understand the political problem here. The last sentence from the above article states it quite nicely:

    "A spokesman for Senator Conroy says the Minister is still looking into whether the filter would require legislation, or could be implemented through another means."

    He's very aware that this isn't going to get through the legislative process. There are obviously other agendas involved that prevent common sense prevailing.