Slashdot Mirror


CIA Expert Decries E-Voting Security

ISoldat53 sends this quote from McClatchy DC: "The CIA, which has been monitoring foreign countries' use of electronic voting systems, has reported apparent vote-rigging schemes in Venezuela, Macedonia and Ukraine and a raft of concerns about the machines' vulnerability to tampering. Appearing last month before a US Election Assistance Commission field hearing in Orlando, Fla., a CIA cybersecurity expert suggested that Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez and his allies fixed a 2004 election recount, an assertion that could further roil US relations with the Latin leader. ... Stigall said that most Web-based ballot systems had proved to be insecure. The commission has been criticized for giving states more than $1 billion to buy electronic equipment without first setting performance standards. Numerous computer-security experts have concluded that US systems can be hacked, and allegations of tampering in Ohio, Florida and other swing states have triggered a campaign to require all voting machines to produce paper audit trails."

13 of 178 comments (clear)

  1. Don't click on the link! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Because then they have to kill you.

  2. And Democrats Rejoice by Clipless · · Score: 5, Funny

    Looks like the old phrase "Vote Early, Vote Often" is going to become an automated process.
    That should save a lot of people some serious time and money

  3. Re:who knows by MrEricSir · · Score: 4, Funny

    But they told us that they closed their misinformation department!

    --
    There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
  4. Democracy by sakdoctor · · Score: 4, Funny

    Don't complain about lack of options. You've got to pick one when you do multiple choice. Those are the breaks.

    Feel free to suggest laws if you're feeling creative. I'd strongly suggest reading the past laws first.

    This whole thing is wildly inaccurate. Rounding errors, ballot stuffers, lobbyists, corruption. If you're using these votes to do anything important, you're insane.

  5. Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    [...]a CIA cybersecurity expert suggested that Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez and his allies fixed a 2004 election recount, an assertion that could further roil US relations with the Latin leader

    Why? Wouldn't it bring them closer? After all, they've got something in common now! =)

  6. Hugo Chavez again? by One+Brave+Prune · · Score: 5, Funny

    Are we out of Iraqi oil already?

  7. Re:Remember kids, its only fair if they agree with by One+Brave+Prune · · Score: 2, Funny

    Which brings us at last to the moment of truth, wherein the fundamental flaw is ultimately expressed, and the Anomaly revealed as both beginning... and end.

  8. CIA, monitor the US by DECS · · Score: 2, Funny

    Having the American CIA monitoring elections in other countries during the Bush Administration is like Microsoft looking for security vulnerabilities in Linux and Mac OS X.

    Kaspersky Sells Mac AntiVirus Fear Using Charlie Miller... Mac AntiVirus Foe

  9. Re:who knows by Korin43 · · Score: 2, Funny

    The information came directly from the Ministry of Truth. You trust the Ministry of Truth right? Everyone else does.

  10. Re:Wow....just wow... by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 2, Funny

    I disagree ... ;-)

    --
    Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  11. Re:Wow....just wow... by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1, Funny

    Mod parent "-1: Does not conform to Slashdot groupthink"! ;)

  12. Re:Wow....just wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    And since most of us agree on this when most of us can't even agree on which operating system is the best for general use, which programming language is best for rapid application development, or which text editor is the best, well, that kind of says something now doesn't it?

    emacs, emacs, and emacs. Next series of questions?

  13. Re:Wow....just wow... by kungfugleek · · Score: 4, Funny

    If you want to draw some *real* attention to the issue, get some super-hackers to rig a major election (doesn't have to be prez, guv or senator would be big enough) so that some crazy-wing write-in wins it. The powers-that-be would know something was up (especially if they were trying to rig it themselves), would probably nullify the election, and probably halt the use of the machines while an investigation ensued. The winner you pick would have to be a crazy fringe candidate, though. The crazier the better. So that *no one* would think for a second that the election was valid.