RIAA Backs Down In Texas Case
NewYorkCountryLawyer writes "After receiving a Rule 11 Sanctions Motion (PDF) in a Houston, Texas, case, UMG Recordings v. Lanzoni, the RIAA lawyers thought better of proceeding with the case, and agreed to voluntarily dismiss the case 'with prejudice', which means it is over and cannot be brought again. The defendant's motion papers detailed some of the RIAA's litigation history against innocent individuals, such as Capitol Records v. Foster and Atlantic Recording v. Andersen, and argued that the awarding of attorneys fees in those cases has not sufficiently deterred repetition of the misconduct, so that a stronger remedy — Rule 11 sanctions — is now called for."
Wow... They were stared down, and blinked...
I think you answered your own question.
They could have received a Rule 34 sanction.
Your ISP still allows breathing?
It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
While they're in there, maybe they should check for ibuprofen and save our school administrators some trouble?
My turnips listen for the soft cry of your love
Good to know that in order to be eligible for Comcast service, you you must submit to the laws of China, North Korea, Iran, and the orders of every other petty dictator on the planet....
You forgot to mention the laws of the Intergalactic Federation under His Grand Emporer Malicon IX.
I for one welcome the total control of our totalitarian overlords.
Ray Beckerman +5 Insightful