Slashdot Mirror


Going Deep Inside Xserve Apple Drive Modules

adamengst writes "If you've had an Xserve drive fail, you may have considered saving some money by putting a replacement drive inside its Apple Drive Module. That may be a false economy, though. TidBITS explains why, while pinning Apple down on exactly what goes into Apple Drive Modules and why they cost so much more than bare retail drives."

8 of 243 comments (clear)

  1. Nothing to see here by clickclickdrone · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Apple dude discovers that servers use, well, server class HDs and they cost more than normal ones.
    Oh, and the 'sleds' that hold the HDs have some LEDs (cool!) and a controller board to work with the cooling system.
    Like pretty much every other half decent server then.

    --
    I want a list of atrocities done in your name - Recoil
    1. Re:Nothing to see here by lukas84 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Except that in this case, every other manufacturer does the same. A port of the higher price also goes in refinancing the warranty that's port of the server.

      Oh, and don't think other vendor-lock in platforms don't do the same. IBM prices System x hard drives and POWER hard drives vastly different, even if they may contain the same harddrive but with a different firmware and hotplug case.

  2. Re:Article text by oldhack · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That ain't no 3rd-party article, it's an Apple sales brochure.

    Disgusting.

    --
    Fuck systemd. Fuck Redhat. Fuck Soylent, too. Wait, scratch the last one.
  3. First paragraph sums it all up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... nicely. Quoting TFA - "About a year ago, we bought an Intel-based Xserve with a pair of 80 GB SATA drives to act as our primary Web server. When the boot drive went flaky on us in October 2008, ... "

    Welcome to pragmatism and reality - Drives fail all the times. So use cheaper drives in redundant mode, replace them with cheaper drives when they fail. You would have saved good amount of money even if the cheaper drives failed three time more than the costlier ones. (450$ for 1TB vs $100 for 1TB - from the same article.)

  4. Having worked in the disk mines... by bashibazouk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Having worked in the disk mines of IBM many years ago, the SCSI disk controller is somewhat your pixie dust but the real reason is the disks, heads and other parts for the SCSI drives came from IBM's best manufacturing facilities. The deathstar ATA drive's parts came from the lesser manufacturing facilities. In theory a SCSI disk should not be much better than ATA but the reality is the best made, more reliable parts go to the high end more profitable products.

  5. Re:Article text by NormalVisual · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And it also doesn't do a good job of explaining why the drive modules are so expensive. "Server-class" SATA drives? Big deal, if you want that, pay $30 more for a Seagate NS drive instead of the consumer-level AS model. Custom firmware? Again, big deal - every server mfr does that (my Seagate NS drives have HP firmware on them), and the article offer no numbers to indicate a qualitative improvement. Extra hardware in the carrier? Again, show me a net benefit for the extra money. Custom rubber grommets? Puh-lease. The quote I found most amusing was this: "A final fact to realize about the custom firmware in ADM drives is that the Xserve's Server Monitor software is designed to monitor about a dozen variables reported by the drive's firmware and report pre-failure warnings if those variables stray outside acceptable limits." Has this person never heard of SMART, and is he not aware that practically every drive made today implements it? It's hardly rocket science to write a SMART monitor.

    The reason Apple (and every other server vendor) charges that much for drives is because that's what they want to do, and it's disingenuous for this guy to be spinning it as if Apple has something special in that regard.

    --
    Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
  6. Worthless Article by a Wannabe Admin. by Kaboom13 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This retarded fluff piece aside, the reason people buy (and pay a premium) for oem "blessed" hard drive replacements is because they JUST FUCKING WORK. If I save $100 on a hard drive, but spend two hours dicking with the raid controller to get it to play nice, or find out that it is in fact 2 mb smaller then the other drives, and now the raid won't rebuild, or has some firmware issue that I now need to rig up something to update, etc. I've lost money.

    There is value in having everything already tested, and all your equipment in a "supported" configuration. When you have problems it makes it that much easier.

    The fact that this article was apparently written by someone who does not know the difference between SAS and SATA makes it completely worthless. Clearly they are not qualified to admin the server they do have, much less write articles about the technical benefits of apple drives over other replacements.

  7. Re:Article text by DarkVader · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's really NOT that informative.

    Informative:

    Yes. You can use off the shelf SATA drives in your ADMs. They will work just fine, and any special firmware tweaks Apple has done in the drive firmware are completely unnoticeable in any real world environment, if they're there at all.

    I've replaced 500GB SATA drives in ADMs with 1TB off the shelf "consumer grade" Seagate drives. They work flawlessly, with no performance penalty. I'd trust them EXACTLY as much as I would Apple-supplied drives - which is to say, not at all without RAID mirroring and a good backup. ALL hard drives fail.

    Not Informative:

    The article. They didn't do anything but trust what some low-level Apple rep gave them. They did NO actual testing, the whole thing is purely anecdotal.