Slashdot Mirror


Ubuntu 9.04 Jaunty Jackalope Now In Beta

An anonymous reader writes "To little fanfare and not much news coverage, Canonical released the beta of Ubuntu 9.04 'Jaunty Jackalope.' I tried it on a Dell Mini 9 using the Ubuntu Netbook Remix (UNR) and it's fabulous! Much better than the sad 'Dell Desktop' that it shipped with. Finally, someone has broken the 25+ year old too-many-open-windows-and-chaos desktop paradigm with UNR's task oriented layout, which is perfect for small netbook screen sizes."

3 of 180 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Screenshots by AvitarX · · Score: 3, Interesting
    --
    Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
  2. Re:It's a beta.. by jdgeorge · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I don't see any reason to make a huge deal about any "new" Linux release.

    Well, two things:
    1. Yeah, that's the kind of news only Nerds would care about! Can't they find an appropriate forum for that?
    2. This is not about a new "Linux" release. It's about a new Ubuntu beta. By contrast, This is a story about a new Linux release.

  3. Re:What you should be asking... by Nevyn · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Or not. The quote says "we are creeping towards $30 million" and that this would make Canonical "self-sustaining", for regular updates, which is their current model of very little development and a lot of marketing.

    So, yeh, it's possible that "creeping towards" does actually mean "really close to, and getting closer every day" and not just "going from 1 to 2 million this year". But I bet against that, personally.

    And who is paying that $30 mil, is it desktop people ... or self supporting server users like the French govt. / Wikipedia. My guess is that any money is coming from the later.

    So at the end of the creep towards $30 mil, what do you get? Still not enough money to fund actual development (feel free to log bugs and RFEs at bugzilla.redhat.com), and a focus on servers instead of the desktop for what little work they do (because that's who is paying).

    --
    ustr: Managed string API with ave. 44% overhead over strdup(), for 0-20B