Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft's New Multiple-Browser Tester

Z80xxc! writes "Microsoft recently announced a new product called Expression Web SuperPreview, which lets developers view their web pages in any browser installed on their system, as well as in different versions of IE, all from the same interface. The product has one genuine innovation — a built-in tool for overlaying the rendering from one browser over another to compare (referred to as 'onion skins'). There are also HTML debugging aids and other helpful tools for web developers. A beta version is available for download. However, the current build only has support for IE — it will compare rendering in IE6 with either IE7 or IE8, whichever is installed. An internal build shows Firefox and Safari on Windows as well. The final product will appear as part of MS Expression Web Studio 3 when it is released later this year. (It will not be available in the Expression Mac suite.)"

6 of 221 comments (clear)

  1. Browsershots by Snowblindeye · · Score: 5, Informative

    There is a free service that does the same thing: browsershots.org

    1. Re:Browsershots by larry+bagina · · Score: 4, Informative

      Queue estimate: 3 minutes to 1 hour, 12 minutes

      It's only free if your time is worth nothing.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    2. Re:Browsershots by RichardJenkins · · Score: 4, Informative

      Overlay? Interactivity? Real time results?

      Last time I checked browser shots didn't provide that for free.

      This sounds like the first new MS product that's interested me in a while.

  2. IETester by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    IETester ( http://www.my-debugbar.com/wiki/IETester/HomePage ) will let you test rendering in IE5.5, IE6, IE7 and IE8 on the same machine - you're not limited to whichever of IE7 and 8 is installed.

  3. Re:Web standards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    No they don't. Not relative to the differences between Trident and most other engines.

    There may be some differences, but they're nothing when compared to IE's awful rendering engine. Just look at the broken box model, or the hasLayout flag for example.

    For around the last five years my Web design job has always revolved around making things look right in standards compliant browsers, then hacking for IE. Look at the code of most sites these days and you'll see an IE-specific style sheet.

  4. Re:Age of the browser? by benwaggoner · · Score: 5, Informative

    Exactly. The problem isn't that IE6 was a bad browser for its era. The problem is that lots of people haven't upgraded to a more recent version, which is typical of the corporate managed desktop market.

    IE7's been on the market for, what 2.5 years now? How many people are still running 2.5 year old versions of Firefox or Safari on thier personal desktops? Not many. And that's not something about IE in particular, but of some markets where IE is dominant. I don't imagine many avid gamers on Windows are running IE6, as a counterexample.

    Had Windows bundled Netscape instead of IE, it'd be Netscape we'd be griping about today. But the real issue is how slow corporate desktops are to get updated for ANYTHING not required for security or line-of-business.

    Windows Media Player 9, which was released back in 2003, has only become standard in corporate America in the last year or so, and there are some holdouts even there.