Slashdot Mirror


Huge German Donation Marks Wikipedia's Evolution

Raul654 writes "In December, we discussed the German Federal Archive's agreement, at the urging of Wikimedia Deutschland, to donate 100,000 pictures to Wikipedia under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license. At the time that was the largest picture donation ever to Wikipedia, and thought to be largest in the history of the free culture movement. Now Wikimedia Deutschland has reached a similar agreement with the Saxon State and University Library, which will donate 250,000 pictures to Wikipedia under CCA-ShareAlike. On a not-unrelated note: Microsoft has announced that it will discontinue its Encarta encyclopedia."

13 of 130 comments (clear)

  1. Encarta? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Did anyone know it was still around?

    1. Re:Encarta? by Bob54321 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Did anyone know it was still around?

      Well, yes... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Encarta

      --
      :(){ :|:& };:
    2. Re:Encarta? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Probably under some kind of Microsoft Encyclopedia Media Multi Distribution SemiCommons License.

  2. Re:nice by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 3, Funny

    But if that happens, will that mean the standard of measurement will become 'how many Wikipedias is that?'

    --
    I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
  3. Re:Gee... by bhtooefr · · Score: 4, Funny

    The beauty of their license is, you can scrape their DB, make a new wiki-based encyclopedia, and try to compete on flexibility of rules.

  4. Re:"Huge German Donation" by copponex · · Score: 4, Funny

    Das sagt deine Freundin auch immer!!!!!

  5. Lots of pictures from German donors, eh? by HoldmyCauls · · Score: 3, Funny

    Are they *all* of David Hasselhoff?

    --
    Emacs: for people who just never know when to :q!
  6. Re:Gee... by larry+bagina · · Score: 5, Funny
    I find the discussion pages to be much more informative than the article itself in many cases.

    The peter north discussion, for example, contains dozens of people repeating the same basic arguments over and over:

    • He has a big dick!
    • It's statistically impossible for him to have a large dick!
    • I have lots of (gay) sex and his dick is average.
    • I have a large dick, too!
    --
    Do you even lift?

    These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

  7. Re:Actually, I consider this the big news by B1oodAnge1 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Please excuse my deplorable lack of pedantry... :-P

    --
    RUGBYRUGBYRUGBY
  8. Re:"Huge German Donation" by jlp2097 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Translation for the lazy:

    "That's also what your girlfriend always says!"

  9. "not-unrelated note"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Back in my day we called those "related note".

  10. Re:nice by Ihmhi · · Score: 2, Funny

    Not until someone can quantify elitist asshole admins in a number. d:

  11. Re:nice by orgelspieler · · Score: 2, Funny

    The SI unit for elitist asshole admins is the jimbo (Ji).