Slashdot Mirror


Cold War Standoff Over ISS Toilet

Hugh Pickens writes "The International Space Station, once a place where astronauts would share food and facilities, is said to be embroiled in a Cold War-like stand-off after a Russian cosmonaut complained he is no longer allowed to use a US toilet or the US gym machine. Gennady Padalka, a veteran Russian cosmonaut, says that space officials from Russia, the United States and other countries now require cosmonauts and astronauts to eat their own food and follow stringent rules on access to other facilities, including lavatories. Padalka, who will be the station's next commander, says the arguments date back to 2003, when Russia started charging other space agencies for the resources used by their astronauts and other partners in space station responded in kind. 'Cosmonauts are above the ongoing squabble, no matter what officials decide,' says Padalka. 'We are grown-up, well-educated and good-mannered people and can use our own brains to create normal relationship. It's politicians and bureaucrats who can't reach agreement, not us, cosmonauts and astronauts.' While sharing food in the past helped the crew feel like a team, the new rules oblige Russian cosmonauts and US astronauts to eat their own food. 'They also recommend us to only use national toilets,' says Padalka. 'What is going on has an adverse effect on our work.'"

14 of 417 comments (clear)

  1. This is just sheer stupidity. by Black+Rabbit · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What fucking idiot politician thought this up?

    1. Re:This is just sheer stupidity. by Shakrai · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Unfortunately ALL of them qualify as "fucking idiots"

      Fixed that for you. You had an extra word in there.

      Why do we elect these bozos as our leaders?

      Because the bozo in my political party stands for all that is just and righteous, while the bozo in the other political party is out to destroy America as we know it.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    2. Re:This is just sheer stupidity. by GooberToo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Its actually not what it sounds like. Russia has been making money with space tourists and the US does not want to fund the extra wear and tear forced on the sparse resources.

      Should US tax dollars really be used to allow for billionaires to play around in space? No. The simple fact is, it is VERY expensive to repair/replace anything in space and Russia is increasing the wear on various components by bringing additional people aboard who provide no benefit what-so-ever. In a very reasonable and appropriate response, the US' position is, if the Russians want to place additional burdens on sparse resources, they need to do so only on their own resources. Contrary to the idiocy of the article, its a very reasonable position to hold. If Russia wants their complaint to be heard, all they have to do is start being reasonable and responsible. Until such time, they can STFU and burden their own resources. If they don't like it, they can start acting responsibly.

    3. Re:This is just sheer stupidity. by sjames · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Brought to you by the makers of the Cold War where supposed grownups threatened to render large parts of the world uninhabitable and gave a generation of children nightmares due to a disagreement over economic systems.

    4. Re:This is just sheer stupidity. by fugue · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Its actually not what it sounds like. Russia has been making money with space tourists and the US does not want to fund the extra wear and tear forced on the sparse resources.

      That is reasonable, but it's not what the article says. If the rule were "Tourists must not filch food or gym fees or waste disposal from (other nations') taxpayers" then I'd be for it. But what the hell is the point of an international collaboration if there is no international collaboration? If this makes the 'nauts' lives worse, it is a stupid idea. What is the cost of training an astronaut and putting her in orbit vs. the cost of buying a foreigner lunch every so often (or all the time) in order to foster an atmosphere of cooperation? We now have less effective teams in space. As a taxpayer, I feel ripped off.

      --
      "The biggest problem with communication is the illusion that it has taken place."
    5. Re:This is just sheer stupidity. by Flytrap · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The russians? I mean the summary says quite clearly the russians started it and if they did I'd also start charging right back at them...

      I doubt that that will be a wise move for any nation, considering that the Russians will be the only way to and from the station for several years; they also have the only regular cargo shuttle (the Europeans managed a single experimental trip that promisses a significant improvement in cargo capacity); and the emergancy evacuation shuttle is a Russian soyuze attached to the station.

      I'd say that nobody is in a position to dictate terms to the Russians, at least for the next 8-odd years.

  2. Re:In Soviet Space Station by east+coast · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Seriously though, can't the crew just tell the people on the ground to shove it up their ass?

    I think that's pretty much what they're saying: 'Cosmonauts are above the ongoing squabble, no matter what officials decide,' says Padalka. 'We are grown-up, well-educated and good-mannered people and can use our own brains to create normal relationship. It's politicians and bureaucrats who can't reach agreement, not us, cosmonauts and astronauts.'

    It's refreshing to have such a public statement of defiance in the face of stupidity. Too bad Republicans and Democrats (not just the politicians but also their brown shirts on the ground) don't do the same in a very forward manner. Yes, Slashdot drones, I'm looking at you.

    --
    Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
  3. Re:Do it anyway by Scutter · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What are the bosses going to do, stop by their desk and give them a stern talking-to?

    The alternative is "you never go to space again and your career as an astronaut/cosmonaut is over". There have been lots of stories in the past about how astronauts are treated like lab rats but they put up with it because it's the only way to get to orbit.

    --

    "Tell me doctor, with all of your defenses, are there any provisions for an attack by killer bees?"
  4. Invisible Lines by scubamage · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You know, its amazing to think how much progress has been destroyed, avoided, or never attained because of stupid, idiotic, invisible little lines drawn up by a bunch of dead men. Maybe that's why I love the internet? It's kind of above this bullshit.

  5. Re:Don't use the Vulcan's toilet by p0tat03 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The same reason perfectly wealthy people quibble over pennies on a dinner bill? When scarcity is no longer a concern, you're still left with the assholes of the world :)

  6. Re:Do it anyway by sshir · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Russians began it by charging to use "their" resources

    Actually, Russians started to charge for the ride to the station which is completely understandable considering costs involved.

    Summary is rather inflammatory by calling it "charging for resources".

    Yea, the toilet thing is a really petty retaliation. But this is the era of asymmetric warfare after all...

  7. Re:It's because by Nerdfest · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's purely a political 'pissing contest'.

  8. Re:America as we know it by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Perhaps doing so and then rebuilding it "as its forefathers intended" (and accounting for current situations) might be a good plan.

    Its forefathers intended it to be a nation run by and for wealthy white men. Which, for the most part, it still is.

    Its forefathers intended it to be an agrarian, rural nation -- Jefferson, for example, believed that large cities were "pestilential to the morals, the health and the liberties of man."

    Rebuilding the U.S. "as its forefathers intended" would mean a lot of regression; "accounting for current situations" leaves little relevance to many of their ideas.

    The Founders had a few good ideas -- the U.S. ought to avoid foreign wars and mind its own business, government ought to be representative and its powers limited, and those limits should be fixed in writing. And I have to give Washington serious props for doing the Cincinnatus thing.

    But by and large, they were slave-owning aristocrats, and we ought not worship them or their ideals.

    --
    Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
    You cannot wash away blood with blood
  9. Re:America as we know it by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Oh, God, where to start?

    We didn't seem to have as much violence

    Murder rates were about 25% higher in 1989 than they are now. Google "US homicide rate by year" and you will find a ton of documentation.

    parents weren't afraid to let their kids play outside

    The mid-Eighties were the height of the "Satanic ritual child abuse" witch-hunt hysteria. By the late Eighties, the idea that the world was a horrible scary place waiting to eat the poor innocent children was firmly implanted in the public consciousness.

    Heck, only a few short years before then...you could fsck all you wanted, and the worst you had to fear was getting a shot from the Dr. to clear up any STD you had.

    AIDS was first identified in 1981, and HIV was identified as the pathogen responsible in 1983, IIRC. By 1989, the risks of heterosexual as well as homosexual transmission were well known ... and the drugs available at the time would kill you faster than the disease itself would, as opposed to the current generation of AIDS drugs which, while they still have some pretty nasty side effects, do allow HIV-infected people to live relatively healthy lives for a number of years after infection.

    we weren't being overrun by our neighbors from the south as badly as now

    America has always gone through ebbs and flows of immigration, and corresponding bouts of hysteria about it. The current anti-immigrant dustup is no different from that which greeted the Scots-Irish, the Germans, the Irish Irish, the Chinese, the Italians, the Poles, etc. Note that most of those people's grandkids and great-grandkids now speak English and call themselves Americans. As for the specific issue of immigration from Mexico, anyone who lives in the Southwest can tell you that it's not exactly a new phenomenon.

    Sure, the tech today is SOOO much better, but, it wasn't being twisted and used by the govt. against us quite so badly.

    There was this little thing back then called the "Cold War." Ever heard of it? I sure as hell did. I was stationed in Europe when the Wall came down. You want to talk about governments using technology against their citizens, well, holding most of the world's population in a giant game of nuclear "chicken" pretty much takes the cake.

    You're not remembering the Eighties. You're remembering a mythical Golden Age, which always seems to occur somewhere between two decades and two centuries in the past. No matter who you talk to, in any country, in any era, there's always The Time When Things Were Better. Except if you go back and look at the facts, you'll see that it hardly ever was.

    --
    The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.