Slashdot Mirror


Wolverine Film Leaked a Month Before Release

hansamurai writes "The FBI are investigating the leak of an almost finished copy of X-Men Origins: Wolverine a month before the film's cinema release. The movie was reported to have been downloaded several hundred thousand times and has since been 'removed.' Viewers have called the movie incomplete, missing some special effects and music. Fox and the MPAA are still upset, though, but say the copy is forensically marked and can be traced to the leak. The film is due out May 1st in the United States, and the leaked copy is marked March 2nd."

10 of 464 comments (clear)

  1. But Honestly... by StDoodle · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Ok, even if I don't agree, I can at least see the logic between "full movie dl's = less ticket sales." But this is a freaking action movie without completed special effects. Can you honestly tell me there are a significant number of people interested in seeing an action movie, minus special effects, who aren't also the fanboy-types who will see it in theatres?

  2. I loved the BBC article by Xest · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It talks about how the FBI has been called like it's a major disaster.

    I can picture it now:

    FBI: Hello FBI?

    MPAA: THE NEW WOLVERINE FILM HAS BEEN LEAKED

    FBI: SHIT, EVERYONE DROP THEIR RAPE CASES, THEIR KIDDIE PORN CASES, THEIR TERRORIST CASES, THE NEW WOLVERINE FILM HAS BEEN LEAKED WE MUST FIND OUT WHO DID THIS

    It's just the way the leak of a film gets more news coverage than more serious stories. It's like it's an international tragedy. I mean seriously, a film with chunks missing, temporary sound, CGI missing and so on. There are companies every day that have their security breached and IP stolen. Why does it get international coverage when it's a half-finished movie?

    The real response from the FBI should be:

    FBI: Here's your case number, take your ticket and get to the back of the queue

    On a side note the BBC also said that Fox has had the download of the new film taken down now - that baffled me a bit, I doubt very much they've managed to get it removed from the whole internet, if they have they're the first company in history to achieve such a thing!

  3. Re:I missed it? by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Damn I wanted a copy of it and to be honest I will still see it in theatres.

    I will never again willingly watch anything in a cinema so long as I live. Poor food, poor seats, poor video quality, and most of all poor company. The only advantage cinemas still retain over my living room is their sound systems, and frankly it's not worth the bother. I will wait for the Blu-Ray of any new film. It costs about as much as trip to the cinema anyway.

    And if the studio refuses to release in my region simultaneously with others, I'll download the film. Tough luck guys. I had the money in my hand, ready to give it to you, but you gave me the finger instead. So guess what I'm giving you.

    --
    May the Maths Be with you!
  4. Re:Marvel's "Origin" Series by kylemonger · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I also hold the very unpopular viewpoint that it's basically a slap in the face to an artist to view their work before they're done with it.

    I would agree with you about most artistic endeavors but not about the sausageworks that is big studio moviemaking. Artistic integrity left that building long ago. I wouldn't be surprised if this were an intentional leak, done to generate more interest in the movie. I didn't even know there was a Wolverine movie being made, but I do now. News = free publicity. And there's no downside. Nobody who wants to see the real movie is going to be satisfied by a work print with missing effects, sound editing and God knows what else.

  5. Re:I missed it? by santiagodraco · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There's plenty of great actors and actresses around. The fact that there are a LOT more movies coming out might give the appearance of low quality, but, frankly, there were a lot of low quality movies "back in the day".

    As for actors being chosen for their "real life drama", come on. We live in a society of the most venomous fans I've ever seen. If an actor has real life drama it's more of a death knell than a sign of success to come.

  6. Torrentfreak or slashdot? by cliffski · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So has this site given up all pretence of being 'news for nerds' and become a side-project for the pirate bay now?

    Every story concerning piracy takes the pirates POV, every criticism of thepiratebay is brushed aside, and now top stories are new hollywood movies, complete with +5 modded links to copyrighted material.

    I thought bit-torrent was only used for free speech and linux distros?

    +5 hyprocrites

    --
    DRM-free indie games for the PC and Mac: Positech Games
    1. Re:Torrentfreak or slashdot? by cliffski · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Wow, hip young trendy kid!
      I didn't realise that being able to torrent Hollywood movies was the most important thing the world for nerds.
      Has it ever occurred to you that some nerds really don't mind so much paying for music, software and games that they want to use and enjoy?
      In fact, nerds should be paying for software more than anyone, because we appreciate the effort involved in its production.

      You are confusing nerds with "kids who know how to use a PC."

      --
      DRM-free indie games for the PC and Mac: Positech Games
  7. Re:I missed it? by sukotto · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Bah, it's probably just the MPAA's new business model. They know the movie is a piece of crap that won't do well in the theatre... so instead they "leak" it then sue everyone that touches the torrent.

    (-1 cynical)

    --
    Come play free flash games on Kongregate!
  8. Two things by Weaselmancer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    First. I agree with the OP and the BBC. How the hell does this get some sort of express FBI coverage? It's a freaking movie. Not a bomb threat or a kidnapping. So some sweaty fanboy snagged a pre-release copy. So freaking what?

    It's sickening how the government will instantly bend over backwards for big business. Pathetic.

    Second thing.

    But it is reasonable to pursue something like this, because realistically a work print this early will drive down sales in a major way costing the producers millions, easily.

    Prove it.

    How do you know this won't work like an extended commercial, drumming up interest? Studies have shown that people who illegally download music also happen to spend more on music than other people.

    The FBI may be trying to bust someone who helped, rather than harmed the studio.

    The main problem with crap like this is how do you assess damage? We all know that it's possible to skew the numbers in such a way that a single mp3 download is equal to either thousands of hours worth of free advertising, or thousands of dollars worth of lost sales.

    Until someone resolves that debate, you really can't call this anything more than a single copyright violation. And certainly not worthy of anything more than a raised eyebrow from the FBI, rather than this gigantic government funded reacharound they're giving the MPAA.

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
  9. Re:I missed it? by Mishotaki · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There is nothing wrong with choosing someone for their tits.

    except when it's to watch someone who has no acting talent for 2 hours straight without showing a single nipple...