Slashdot Mirror


Debian Gets FreeBSD Kernel Support

mu22le writes "Today Debian gets one step closer to really becoming 'the universal operating system' by adding two architectures based on the FreeBSD kernel to the unstable archive. This does not mean that the Debian project is ditching the Linux kernel; Debian users will be able to choose which kernel they want to install (at least on on the i386 and amd64 architectures) and get more or less the same Debian operating system they are used to. This makes Debian the first distribution, and probably the first large OS, to support two completely different kernels at the same time."

4 of 425 comments (clear)

  1. Re:I run Debian, and I run FreeBSD. by RiotingPacifist · · Score: 5, Interesting

    FreeBSD
    *is more secure (apparently, i don't know enough to be sure but they're development model and security results do tend to suggest this)
    *has zfs,
    *etc

      while linux has other advantages,
    *hardware support for many newer devices,
    *faster boot (i think),
    *lvm (imho when snapshot merging merges, i think it can compete with zfs)
    *etc

    So while I think the biggest difference though is the licensing, there are some pretty big differences that affect users.

    --
    IranAir Flight 655 never forget!
  2. Re:Gentoo Did This Years Ago by disi · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I tested it myself, for a server with no fancy Desktop it compiles very well. Many packages are already tested and get the ~x86-fbsd keyword for installation. Also Sparc+Gentoo+FreeBSD is possible :) disi@disi-desktop ~ $ cat /usr/portage/www-servers/apache/apache-2.2.* | grep bsd KEYWORDS="alpha amd64 arm hppa ia64 ~mips ppc ppc64 s390 sh sparc ~sparc-fbsd x86 ~x86-fbsd" http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/gentoo-freebsd.xml

  3. Re:I run Debian, and I run FreeBSD. by Anthony_Cargile · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Two kernels? At the same time? I'll be in my bunk.

    That's essentially what cooperative Linux does, runs a Linux kernel and the NT kernel at the same time, often with a special X emulator to get full-blown Linux apps running in Windows userspace with better support than with Cygwin. I still can't wrap my head around how the two kernels yield to each other in respect to the PC architecture, but it's an interesting project - guaranteed to keep you in your bunk for a while ;)

  4. Re:I run Debian, and I run FreeBSD. by iris-n · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Energy saving.

    I turn off my computer every night, when it isn't downloading something. It's about 6 hours of near-zero power consumption every day. If everyone did that it would make a difference in energy use. I could just suspend, but if it isn't going to do anything anyway, let's save a couple more joules, shall we?

    And when I boot it in the morning, I don't want to have to wait two minutes just to see xkcd.

    Especially since Arjan demonstrated it was so easy to optimise the process.

    I think if the boot was quick to begin with, people wouldn't have got this bad habit of leaving the computer on 24/7. Just because Linux can run months straight doesn't mean that it should.

    --
    entropy happens