Slashdot Mirror


Powerful Sonar Causes Deafness In Dolphins

Hugh Pickens writes "Mass strandings of dolphins and whales could be caused because the animals are rendered temporarily deaf by military sonar, experiments have shown. Tests on a captive dolphin have demonstrated that hearing can be lost for up to 40 minutes on exposure to sonar and may explain several strandings of dolphins and whales in the past decade. Most strandings are still thought to be natural events, but the tests strengthen fears that exercises by naval vessels equipped with sonar are responsible for at least some of them. For example, in the Bahamas in March, 2000, 16 Cuvier's beaked whales and Blainville's beaked whales and a spotted dolphin beached during a US navy exercise in which sonar was used intensively for 16 hours (PDF). 'The big question is what causes them to strand,' says Dr. Aran Mooney, of the University of Hawaii. 'What we are looking at are animals whose primary sense is hearing, like ours is seeing. Their ears are the most sensitive organ they have.' In the experiment, scientists fitted a harmless suction cup to the dolphin's head, with a sensor attached that monitored the animal's brainwaves, and when the pings reached 203 decibels and were repeated, the neurological data showed the mammal had become deaf, for its brain no longer responded to sound. 'We definitely showed that there are physiological and some behavioral effects [from repeated, loud sonar], but to extrapolate that into the wild, we don't really know,' said Mooney."

5 of 323 comments (clear)

  1. Experiments like these... by fprintf · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Experiments like these are like putting people next to a jet engine to see if their hearing gets damaged. I am no PETA freak, but putting 200+ decibels is bound to do permanent damage. I know they said it is temporary, but that might be like my "temporary" hearing loss from the Boston show a few months back. Yes, I could hear fine afterward* but I wonder what incremental loss I might have had from all that loudness.

    *I have higher pitch loss that apparently came from shooting a lot many years ago without hearing protection.

    --
    This post brought to you by your friendly neighborhood MBA.
    1. Re:Experiments like these... by radtea · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I am no PETA freak, but putting 200+ decibels is bound to do permanent damage.

      The document linked on the Bahamas stranding says that source levels were 223 - 235 dB and levels were less than 180 dB at 300 m horizontally and 200 m vertically, so unless the dolphins were EXTREMELY close to the ships when the sonar was turned on the odds of even temporary deafness due to the use of sonar in the wild are quite low. Remember: a 40 dB difference in signal is a factor of 10,000 in amplitude of the pressure wave, so unless the dolphins were within a few meters of the source they would be very unlikely to get anything close to 200 dB.

      This is a bit like dropping a 10 kg mass on a person and noticing it causes serious damage, and then arguing that you can say something about the effects of dropping 0.001 kg masses on people based on the 10 kg data.

      That's not to say that it isn't plausible that dolphin sonar can be screwed up by powerful sonar, but this experiment just doesn't seem relevant to the question.

      --
      Blasphemy is a human right. Blasphemophobia kills.
    2. Re:Experiments like these... by INeededALogin · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The document linked on the Bahamas stranding says that source levels were 223 - 235 dB and levels were less than 180 dB at 300 m horizontally and 200 m

      180 db is still extremely strong. Now, compound that with the fact that the Submarines are moving, pinging and that Dolphins are curious anmials and like to follow ships... and I think you will find that the chances for Dolphins being near one of these ships greatly increased.

      Also, I understand the need to defend the human race, military and blowing stuff up, but ask any blind person how much noise pollution hurts and then comment again.

  2. to the "wellduh" taggers by dAzED1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    My wife is a wildlife conservation researcher, and specifically works with animals in the Delphinidae family (which include dolphins). There's a lot of stuff she, and others, have to - must - verify, even if it seems to be a "wellduh."

    The alternative would be that science just thinks correlation = causation. Is that what we want? "Well, Navy ships used sonar, and these whales stranded themselves...must be related. Case closed." Instead, someone did actual science showing that sonar causes real deafness in these animals. And someone wants to harsh that?

    I say instead that there should be a tag, "abouttimetheyverified"

  3. Re:203 decibels? by Macthorpe · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Sucks that it apparently harms marine life but what can you do?

    Stop human beings from killing each other over nothing, obviating the need for submarines and therefore sonar?

    I like to start small and work up.

    --
    "It does not do to leave a live dragon out of your calculations, if you live near him." - Tolkien