Slashdot Mirror


Dell Adamo Review — Macho Outside, Sissy Inside

Odelia Lee writes with a full review of Dell's new Adamo slimtop over at Gizmodo. While it may have an sleek exterior there are definite gaps (both literal and figurative) in their engineering. "The Adamo is both a compliment and an insult to Dell engineering. It's possibly the most beautiful computer Dell has ever manufactured, but I'm not sure that Dell has caught up to competitors in either aesthetics or power. There have been lots of qualitative Adamo reviews out there, but we got the first of the units that will actually ship to customers, so it's time for real benchmarks. As it happens, performance is really what's at stake here."

4 of 144 comments (clear)

  1. Apples and Oranges? by icebike · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The processor speed of the Macbook Air was a lot higher than the Adamo. The Adamo easily outpaced the Lenovo with the same processor speed.

    Of course processor speed isn't everything.

    The video card is the key here (or so the reviewers would have your believe).

    In the real world that this device was meant to operate in, I suspect Joe User would never notice the difference in video performance since its adequate for YouTube.

    --
    Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
  2. My 2 year old X61 Thinkpad is lighter, faster, by Logic+Worshipper · · Score: 2, Interesting

    and cheaper. 1.2Ghz dual core processor? Wtf? My 2 year old 3lb thinkpad has a 1.8Ghz dual core processor, and I bought it new for half what an Adamo costs 2 years ago. If an Adamo was a cheaper alternative to a thinkpad I could understand, but it's more expensive too! Why would anyone in their right mind buy a Adamo instead of thinkpad?

    1. Re:My 2 year old X61 Thinkpad is lighter, faster, by beelsebob · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Oh fail, I read T61, but then, you could fit *three* MacBook airs inside the thicknss of the X61.

  3. Re:Article summary nails it by arth1 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Bigger, heavier, louder (which, to me, is half the point of something like the air), integrated battery (just like the air), bad performance, higher price... what's the point?

    It's not a notebook for you and me, who want the best bang for the buck. It's aimed at mid-to-upper level managers and sales staff, who need something that feels sturdy and looks classy, yet is capable of non-intensive tasks like displaying powerpoint presentations, send an e-mail saying you'll be late for tee-off, and watch pr0n^Wlight entertainment from the hotel room.

    How it performs is irrelevant -- the intended user group wouldn't be able to take advantage of the performance anyhow.

    I predict it's going to sell well to its target group -- especially in the numerous companies where Dell is one of a few approved manufacturers to choose from, and an Apple wouldn't be paid for by the company even if it danced the jitterbug and wiped your arse.