Slashdot Mirror


Tesla Roadster Runs For 241 Miles In E-Rally

N!NJA writes with the mention of a recent alternative energies rally where the Tesla Roadster managed to cover 241 miles on a single charge, with another 38 miles of juice still left in the battery. "That would give the Roadster a theoretical maximum touring range of nearly 280 miles — 36 miles more than Tesla itself reckons the car will cover on a charge. If the numbers stand up to official scrutiny, Tesla will hold the world record for the longest distance traveled by a production electric car on a single charge. Of course, it should be pointed out that the Tesla was driven by a company staffer doubtless practiced in eking out every last mile from a charge, and that the speeds averaged on the run were hardly blistering — 90kph (56mph) on the motorways, 60kph (37mph) on trunk roads and 30kph (19) in the mountain roads. Tesla reckon the average speed for the entire journey was 45kph (28mph)."

2 of 294 comments (clear)

  1. 28mph over 280 miles is not good... by VinylRecords · · Score: 0, Troll

    I drove 280 miles today (central NY to upstate) and it took me 3.5 hours, meaning I traveled an average speed of 80mph for the journey. Even at an average of 65mph (the proper speed limit) the journey would take 4.3 hours.

    4 hours is a far cry from 10 hours traveling.

    While gas (and money) is a commodity that I would save by traveling with an automobile than ran on an alternative fuel source, there is a negative cost, an exchange of time. I save money, but I lose time. If you calculate how much I get paid an hour and convert the lost hours to dollars, it's more cost efficient for me to take a gas powered car over 4 hours than an electric car for 10 hours.

    Even then, if I didn't want to drive, I could take a train ticket for the same price as a full tank of gas at current prices, and get home in 4 or 5 hours at most anyways.

    Even if the electric (or alternative fuel source) cars are cheaper to run and operate, time must also be factored in as a commodity, and weighed accordingly. But if these cars continue to run at considerably slower speeds than gas fueled cars I don't see many people shifting to them.

  2. It is not the range or 0-60 perf, stupid by prakslash · · Score: 0, Troll
    Sorry to sound like a cynic but a car that needs to be plugged-in will never be the one for the masses.

    Where will people who live in apartments plug in their car? At power-equipped gas stations, you say? And, what, pray, will they do while the car takes hours to get charged up?

    Unless the charging time can be brought down to 5-10 minutes, this is the wrong horse to bet on.

    Plug-ins are not the wave of the future. Hydrogen is.