Slashdot Mirror


South Korean Financial Blogger Faces 18 Months of Prison

eldavojohn writes "A South Korean blogger named Park Dae-sung has been arrested and charged with destabilizing foreign markets by blogging about declining companies. This is the same blogger who predicted the economic downturn that has been experienced the world over. The Korean Times offers more information on the community college graduate and the accusations levied against him." Several readers have also sent in news that Omidreza Mirsayafi, an Iranian blogger arrested and imprisoned for his writings earlier this year, has now died in custody.

6 of 177 comments (clear)

  1. South Korea is a tribal democracy by incognito84 · · Score: 3, Informative
    Anyone who has spent any time in Korea figures this one out pretty quick. Especially if one finds themselves in a legal entanglement. Koreans think Western law is cold, formuliac and overly rational. Korean law often finds it's "reason" in emotional response, a response usually vocalized by the masses or the majority involved in the case.

    It is not the same legal process as one would find in the West, where technicalities and Habeas Corpus rein supreme. Someone made a joke about the goverment detaining this particular blogger because he was more intelligent and resourceful than the government, which made the government jealous. That is more true than you know.

    Additionally, Korea is the most Confucian country in the world which might add some understanding into why laws aren't always followed in a logical way. This blogger made the government "lose face", to be blunt.

  2. Re:Summary is inaccurate by Dionysus · · Score: 3, Informative

    From the Washington Post article:

    Prosecutors claim that one of his postings is clearly false. The government issued an emergency order Dec. 29, Minerva wrote, urging top banks to stop buying dollars. The government has denied issuing the order, but a number of currency traders have told the South Korean media that the government did urge banks that day to refrain from buying dollars.

    --
    Je ne parle pas francais.
  3. Re:Summary is inaccurate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    I am a South Korean, and I'll clarify.

    The blogger (Minerva) claimed that South Korean government issued an "official order" for Korean banks not to purchase USD for a certain (short) period. IIRC, the average exchange rate during that particular day was going to be used in a lot of financial charts, so by gaming the system, many companies would look financially better in documents and the government will boast it to the people.

    Turns out that there was no official order. Why create an official document when a phone call would suffice?

    And, ladies and gentlemen, in South Korea, this is a felony that will ensure 18 months in prison. Only if he had correctly said "phone calls"! (Well, of course the government would've found yet another even more ridiculous excuse to punish him, so it won't matter much in the end. They are immune to logic. Why follow logic, when you can just throw one bullshit argument and another and still have half of the nation vote for you?)

  4. Re:News from the future by Daengbo · · Score: 3, Informative

    Now that Korea doesn't allow anonymous postings (requiring the citizen's ID number to register) and has started a (mostly unregulated) Inter police taskforce, this type of arrest is surely to become more common.

    I live in Korea, and my friends and I have been blocked (with required scary Internet police warning) from websites they deemed morally questionable. Right now, these mostly appear to be dating and gay sites, but who knows where it'll go from here. Putting a force in place to watch your people and giving them carte blanche to block whatever they don't like is just inviting trouble.

    Two further comments:

    1. My alien ID doesn't seem to work with any sites, so I am effectively silenced.
    2. This law was passed in response to a celebrity suicide. The Korean govenment chose to protect people from themselves instead of having an intelligent discussion about why suicide isn't an appropriate response to online slander.
  5. Re:News from the future by Daengbo · · Score: 3, Informative

    If you read up and know the story, you will find that the government actually did call up the banks and "strongly discourage" them from trading U.S. currency, In effect, he's being tried on a technicality and being railroaded, and the government -- for all intents and purposes -- did what he said they did. I suspect that they are just upset that he knew, and are looking for a way to silence his blog, which routinely reports anti-majority news.

  6. Re:News from the future by GreatBunzinni · · Score: 4, Informative

    The 31-year-old blogger's crime: falsely reporting that South Korea had barred banks from purchasing U.S. currency. The authorities said the blogger, Park Dae-sung, will find out his sentence on April 20 for posting the inaccurate story that prosecutors said undermined the county's credibility

    First of all, slander is when people talk about it. When it's being written then it's libel.

    Saying that, is it libel when it's the truth? From this washington post article on Park Dae-sung's arrest:

    Prosecutors claim that one of his postings is clearly false. The government issued an emergency order Dec. 29, Minerva wrote, urging top banks to stop buying dollars. The government has denied issuing the order, but a number of currency traders have told the South Korean media that the government did urge banks that day to refrain from buying dollars.

    So, care to retract your comment? After all, it's in itself rather... libellous.

    --
    Slashdot, fix your code or at least hire someone who is competent at it to do it for you.