Slashdot Mirror


Malicious Activity Grew At a Record Pace In 2008

An anonymous reader writes "Symantec announced that malicious code activity continued to grow at a record pace throughout 2008, primarily targeting confidential information of computer users. According to the company's Internet Security Threat Report Volume XIV (PDF), Symantec created more than 1.6 million new malicious code signatures in 2008. This equates to more than 60 percent of the total malicious code signatures ever created by Symantec — a response to the rapidly increasing volume and proliferation of new malicious code threats. These signatures helped Symantec block an average of more than 245 million attempted malicious code attacks across the globe each month during 2008." Another anonymous reader notes a related report from Verizon (PDF), which says 285 million records were compromised in 2008, more than the total of the previous four years combined.

9 of 56 comments (clear)

  1. Time to buy! by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 4, Funny

    Obviously it's a good time to make that security products purchase you've been putting off. You probably want something effective... say a software suite that's been able to block more than 245 million attempted malicious code attacks across the globe each month.

    Oh. Wait. I see.

  2. Re:A Full Day of Helpful News Reports! by A.+B3ttik · · Score: 4, Funny

    I would just like to point out that the URL for that PDF report indicates it is stored in a directory named 'mktginfo.' I wonder what that stands for ... "Mortal Kombat: The Game Info" perhaps?

    If you search the folder, there's another file, 'info.txt' with one line:

    UP DOWN UP DOWN A B A B A B A B A B START SELECT

  3. malicious code .. by rs232 · · Score: 3, Funny

    What Operating Systems did this malicious code run on?

    --
    davecb5620@gmail.com
    1. Re:malicious code .. by A.+B3ttik · · Score: 2, Funny

      TI-86

    2. Re:malicious code .. by SpaceLifeForm · · Score: 2, Funny

      There are lots of Operating Systems involved.

      They just happen to originate from the same place.

      --
      You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.
    3. Re:malicious code .. by Thelasko · · Score: 2, Funny

      What Operating Systems did this malicious code run on?

      TI-86

      When will people stop being slaves to Texa$ In$trument$? HPs are so much more secure.

      --
      One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    4. Re:malicious code .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      What Operating Systems did this malicious code run on?

      TI-86

      When will people stop being slaves to Texa$ In$trument$? HPs are so much more secure.

      We're never going to see the "Year of The HP Calculator" until you people wake up and realize that Joe Six-pack doesn't want to have to learn RPN just to do simple algebra!

  4. Vista -- Security by KingPin27 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Perhaps McAfee noticed that there are more users running computers with "Black Screens where they type in command lines" -

    --
    "i lost my dignity on a slippery wiener"
  5. Symantec by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    With our Corporate Edition SAV 10 installed, my machine is too slow to effectively run any other malware. I think Symantec did a good job of preventing other malware from getting any disk I/O at all.