Slashdot Mirror


First Android-Based Netbook, Set-Top Box

An anonymous reader writes "China based Skytone famous for making skype headsets have brought out a $100 device, the Alpha-680 netbook running Google Android for its OS. The device has Wi-Fi, Ethernet, USB ports and an SD card slot. After watching the video though, I get a feeling that the boot time is somewhat long. IMO good enough for browsing." Also on the Android front, ruphus13 points out what the maker claims is the first "fully realized" non-mobile Android device (though I think there were some other non-mobile gadgets on diplay at CES), a set-top box from Motorola based on Android. According to the linked post, it's "capable of playing DVDs and CDs, transferring music and video to a mobile device, and ripping and storing files" and "will have a full-featured Chrome-like browser."

25 of 114 comments (clear)

  1. Anemic for 100 by CSFFlame · · Score: 5, Insightful

    $100 isn't very much. As low spec as that is, it's very good for $100. I don't know why they were bashing it so much.

  2. Android Java by pleappleappleap · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'd be much more impressed with android if there was a full JRE available.

    1. Re:Android Java by BikeHelmet · · Score: 2, Informative

      JamVM proved that interpreting java can be faster than JIT compiling it. JamVM is the fastest JavaSE-capable JVM for ARM based devices that isn't made by Sun.

      It's still way slower than optimized C or assembly, but... GCC is pretty bad at optimizing for ARM, so the difference between C and interpreted java isn't that huge. (maybe 2-4x faster)

  3. In other news... by Nerdposeur · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...amateur astronomers have just spotted a flaming mass falling towards Skytone headquarters. Initial reports indicate that it is shaped like a chair.

    1. Re:In other news... by genghisjahn · · Score: 2, Funny

      Really? Chair jokes are still getting modded +5 funny? Well in that case...I for one welcome our new flaming chair throwing overlords.

      --
      Sorry about the mess.
  4. not a netbook by Lord+Ender · · Score: 2, Insightful

    MacOS, Linux, and Windows have enough apps that they can be considered full-blown operating systems. Android is absolutely not in the same league. It's closer to phone firmware than to PC operating systems.

    This is just a glorified phone, at least for now.

    --
    A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    1. Re:not a netbook by Thornburg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      MacOS, Linux, and Windows have enough apps that they can be considered full-blown operating systems.

      So the iPhone is a full computer? It does run a version of MacOS, and it has tons of apps...

      What about Windows Mobile devices?

      I don't think either "number of apps" or "mac os/linux/windows" is the identifier for "computer" versus "appliance/phone/etc".

      Also, the need to draw a line between the two is rapidly disappearing.

      Welcome to the Great Convergance. AI controlled machines will take over the world and eliminate the human race in 3...2...

    2. Re:not a netbook by Lord+Ender · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well if you want to have mobile phones and netbooks as separate categories, there must be a distinction. And my definition would be that netbooks have all the functionality one would expect from a desktop PC.

      Windows mobile and iPhone do not have anywhere near that functionality. Have you ever tried using the spreadsheet app on WM6? A toy.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    3. Re:not a netbook by Polumna · · Score: 3, Insightful

      How about this for a distinction: I can't imagine trying to talk into a device with a 7" screen.

      Indeed, using a spreadsheet app is mostly a futility on WM6. I can speak from experience on that. Why? Because putting a spreadsheet on a 3" screen is ridiculous. Not because of anything else. My phone has multiple TIMES the processing power and memory of the first computer I used a spreadsheet app on. If I had a VGA output and a mouse input on my phone, there is no reason it couldn't run a port of Excel 97.

      I had a good friend in college (2-3 years ago) who ran around with a 233 Mhz PII, just because he could. It worked fine. He kept some data from our projects on it, even. By comparison to this android device, what would you say it is now? An underpowered netbook? A sub-netbook? A glorified phone? It certainly wouldn't run any modern desktop software either. If it changed categories at some point during its what... 9 year life, when was it? When did it become a netbook? When did it drop to glorified phone?

      Labels are a convenience, so people can talk about roughly the same thing. Sometimes they can be used in arguments for fun or flamebait. They are irrelevant. A device is what it is and is defined by what it is intended to do, nothing else. Arguing about it like it's super important with strict, yet still inherently arbitrary, definitions is an exercise in futility... much like running a spreadsheet app in WM6.

  5. Not disappointed at all! by oo7tushar · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm actually wanting one if it's around $100. It would be perfect for showing simple stats or doing very basic quick commands. Could even write a custom application quickly.

    I'm not anywhere close to disappointed by the specs as the author of the article is.

  6. It's $100 bucks...! by TheNarrator · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Geez... The reviewer was criticizing this netbook saying that this thing was "low-end" and a glorified cellphone. Well I have no idea what kinds of cellphone you can get with a QWERTY keyboard, an RJ45 Jack, USB, 3G, Wifi an SD card slot and an 800x600 screen for $100.

    1. Re:It's $100 bucks...! by dreemernj · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I was thinking the same. And maybe I'm showing my age, but I know I can use a laptop very productively if it has up to 256MB RAM and 4 gigs of storage. It'll never be a powerhouse, but for $100 bucks I'd be happy with one.

      --
      1 (short ton / firkin) = 89.1432354 slugs / keg
    2. Re:It's $100 bucks...! by mweather · · Score: 2, Interesting

      For the size, yiou could probably easily make a smartphone with those features. They're expensive because they're small.

    3. Re:It's $100 bucks...! by fm6 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The "reviewer" was the usual ignorant and opinionated "technology columnist". Saying stupid things is practically part of his job description.

  7. Motorola denied the android set top connection by pancakegeels · · Score: 3, Informative

    according to the reg http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/04/21/android_set_top_not/ If you are getting your hopes up...

  8. I'm a developer, by pleappleappleap · · Score: 2, Insightful

    so rather than having to go through the rigmarole of developing for this tiny set of Java classes, I'd much rather just develop for the Java SE and ME APIs with which I am already familiar.

    One of my favorite features of Java is its cross-platform compatibility.

  9. Compare to TiVo by tepples · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Given that android is a Linux kernel, that would mean that all of these devices are going to make their (kernel) source available right?

    TiVo makes its kernel source code available, but is it useful?

  10. Re:Um by lordtoran · · Score: 2

    It's probably just an XPish skin, like on the first Asus EEE. I hate that. They should just use the damn window manager's default skin instead of fooling potential buyers.

    --
    Want to hear the voice of GOD? cat /boot/vmlinuz > /dev/dsp
  11. Is is really available? by tennesseejim · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Is there anyone actually selling one of these netbooks? Or is it just vaporware?

  12. Re:Um by Darkness404 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Yes, but there could be a few problems with it.

    A) The default skin is ugly for some WMs. While the default look of GNOME and KDE and even XFCE look good, other, lighter WMs look plain ugly when on their default themes.

    B) Licensing issues with some custom themes. Some custom themes may be released under the GPL... But the artwork is proprietary or something so, while its no big deal for an individual, for a company looking to make a profit on them, this is a potential landmine.

    C) People these days seem to think like this: XP like theme == Windows XP == familiar, while Grey and blue == Windows 9X == outdated, and Black or other dark colors == Vista == Unstable and new. So XP-like themes are going to get the most positive first looks for potential computer illiterate buyers. And really, its not that hard to change the theme to something more appealing if you know how to use Linux

    --
    Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
  13. Teaching tool by oh2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A tablet like this one would be a very useful teaching tool. As a teacher I see many potential uses for it and with a low cost it might actually be able to pry loose the money for one per kid. oh, the possibilities. Its going to be a few interesting months ahead when the ARM netbooks start to appear...

    --

    Now the world has gone to bed, Darkness won't engulf my head, I can see by infra-red, How I hate the night.

  14. Re:Why? by fm6 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Please. Java SE may not be the Windows killer Sun used to claim it was, but there are still a lot of people running Java GUI apps, especially in enterprise applications. And not "legacy" apps either. It's a simple way to create simple client programs that you can deploy over the web. It will never replace native apps for most purposes, but it still has a big role.

    The absence of a JRE would all seem to relate to the confusion over what kind of device Android is really meant for. Google seems to have targeted at cell phones and PDA-style devices. In that context, not supporting Java SE makes sense. But once you start deploying Android on netbooks....

  15. I guess Nick Negroponte wins, then. by Medievalist · · Score: 2, Interesting

    He drove the price of a basic laptop down to $100 just like he said he would.

    What was it Ghandi said? First they mock you, then they fight you, then you win?

  16. not anemic by yog · · Score: 2, Interesting

    $100 isn't very much.

    As low spec as that is, it's very good for $100.

    I don't know why they were bashing it so much.

    Agreed, the blogger makes some rather opinionated statements but misses the forest for the trees in this case.

    It's a good trend that low cost hardware manufacturers are getting into the netbook game and featuring systems like Android. Backed by a mega corporation and open sourced, Android is bound to keep getting better. I think it's going to give the iPhone a run for its money eventually.

    As for netbooks, it seems like a good idea for some purposes--a handy little sub laptop. If it works with Skype--and given that the manufacturer makes Skype headsets, and Android does support Skype, you would expect it to--it would be a sweet travel laptop to replace the brick (albeit, a fun Ubuntu brick but still rather hot and energy hungry).

    I'm just a little worried about the origin of the hardware. I've bought several gadgets direct from Chinese resellers or factory sites via Ebay, and I've been underwhelmed by their quality.

    For example, recently I got a little 4 gig MP3 player that turned out to have terrible firmware, a nonstandard headset jack, a very poor battery, crappy UI, and just plain didn't work very well. I later got a Sansa MP3 player that was approximately the same price but much, much better engineered. This pattern has played out several times.

    I think the Chinese copycat manufacturers have some good ideas but their execution, especially their engineering, is nowhere close to American, Japanese, or Korean standards. It's ironic because they make great products when they are spec'd by Americans (e.g., the iPod family and millions of other things), but on their own they seem not to pay the same close attention to detail. Or else, could it be that I've just had bad luck? But I don't think so, or we'd be seeing more Chinese-branded products on local store shelves. Sooner or later, of course, like the Japanese, they'll get it right, and they'll blow the foreign manufacturers out of the water, but not yet.

    In the meantime I think I would tend to trust a unit that was designed by Apple, or Google, or some Taiwanese or American manufacturer rather than one of these homegrown models.

    --
    it's = "it is"; its = possessive. E.g., it's flapping its wings.
  17. Looks like a potential Car PC by Eccles · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I want a car PC. GPS/Nav, ~7" screen, music, bluetooth for my cell, rear-view cam, voice recognition, browser if possible (at least if near Wi-Fi, ideally with 3G if my phone supports it), more. For $100, this might serve as a good basis for it.

    I'm not looking to compile code on it, play FPSes, etc., so the specs don't have to be impressive.

    --
    Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.