Slashdot Mirror


Why AT&T Wants To Keep the iPhone Away From Verizon

Hugh Pickens writes "Saul Hansell of the NY Times has an interesting post analyzing AT&T's earnings report and highlighting the enormous stakes involved in the renewal of its exclusive contract to distribute Apple's iPhone in the United States. Hansell does some rough calculations: 'If the average iPhone customer brings in $90 a month, or $1,080 a year in revenue, and the operating profit margin stays constant at 26 percent, that means an iPhone customer represents at least $561 in operating profit over a two-year contract,' says Hansell. 'Put another way, if the company gets 2.5 million new customers a year because of its iPhone exclusivity, the deal represents at least $700 million a year in operating profits — profits that it could lose if Verizon sold the iPhone, too.' With those sort of numbers, AT&T has every reason to make Apple an offer it can't refuse to keep its exclusive deal for another few years. Of course, the incentives for Verizon are presumably the mirror image, so expect Verizon to come to Cupertino, checkbook in hand, to see what sort of deal they can make. 'The benefit of somewhat more iPhone sales from wide distribution is likely to be swamped by a huge bid from AT&T to keep exclusivity, and an equally high bid from Verizon to win some (or maybe even all) of the business for itself.'"

10 of 237 comments (clear)

  1. Don't worry, AT&T by Daffy+Duck · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You have some breathing room. It will take Verizon at least a year to figure out how to disable all of the iPhone's features so their customers have to buy them back one at a time.

    1. Re:Don't worry, AT&T by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Apple has caved to AT&T in ways that sully their brand before.

      The biggest example is the in-store-activation-only fiasco with the 3G launch. Compare and contrast that experience versus the original iPhone; when you could go in, plonk down your money, get the hell out of there, go home, and activate at your leisure. That idiocy alone pretty much guarantees that as soon as the iPhone is available on another carrier, I'll be dropping AT&T.

      Apple has also pulled apps from the store at AT&T's behest. And despite by "unlimited 3g data" plan, if I want to download the arger apps or podcast episodes; I can't do so over the cellular data network; I have to connect to WiFi.

      Granted... *I* know that none of that is inherent to the iPhone itself; but to AT&T's asshattery. But I suspect that there are plenty of people out there who don't quite make the distinction between the two; and who see Apple as something less than they should because of it.

      cya,
      john

      --
      Imagine all the people...
    2. Re:Don't worry, AT&T by cawpin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Verizon has already announced that they will no longer be locking out features, specifically GPS capability, on new phones. It took a while but they finally learned. Speaking of Geocaching, the iPhone's "GPS" sucks so much you have to have another GPS device anyway. Yes, I'm speaking from experience.

  2. CDMA / GSM by jmauro · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I thought Verizon couldn't use the iPhone because it's GSM and Verizon uses CDMA. There isn't a CDMA version marketed anywhere in the world, they're all GSM. The only options in the US are AT&T and T-Mobile, any bid from any of the other companies would pretty much require them to front the cost of making a CDMA version of the phone since it'd only sell in the US.

  3. Verizon rejected.... by phantomfive · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Verizon rejected the iPhone in the beginning, and they will do it again for the same reason: they want control over their network. They don't want to become just a dumb pipe, because then they are a commodity. Apple having complete control over the iPhone sets a dangerous precedent, it was the first time a phone maker had so much control.

    From my perspective the commoditization of the networks can't happen soon enough. The network maintainers SHOULD be separated from the service providers, and the service providers should lease the network from the maintainers, like Virgin Mobile does now. This will increase competition, and be the best for the customer. The same thing should happen with internet service.

    --
    Qxe4
  4. Re:Yeah God Forbid They Actually Have to COMPETE by cpt_drewbie · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Ever used AT&T's 3G network on an iPhone? Most of the time you probably would assume it's running over EDGE.

  5. Re:Whoever writes the biggest check will lose by Brett+Buck · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Rim, Nokia, HTC, Sony-Ericsson, Samsung, every phone maker is bringing out competing products, if they have not already.

    There is maybe 1 more year of dominance by Apple here, then it's over.

    Sounds a lot like....

    No wireless. Less space than a nomad. Lame.

          Brett

  6. Apple doesn't want to make different iphone models by alen · · Score: 5, Insightful

    just like with computers, apple wants to make only minor variations of a model. for the iphone it's how much storage you want. with their computers it's only a few minor variations as well.

    more choices means more expensive to produce, more testing, etc. Less profits due to higher costs.

    and with CDMA, why make a phone for a dying technology?

  7. Re:Verizon is in Apple's Best Interest! (Re: Apple by GizmoToy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A Verizon iPhone would be in the best interest of Apple, even if they had to give up some profits. Why?

    1) AT&T's network Sucks. I have heard many complaints that the iPhone is wonderful -- at everything but being a plain cellphone.

    2) AT&T's customer service sucks. DNA from a big telco. Monopoly mindset. Nuff said!

    3) Mindshare is king. If there were a Verizon iPhone, there would be more Apple iPhone mindshare. I hated to leave Verizon's better network and service for AT&T's suckyness, but I did it anyways. Lower that barrier, and many more people like me would have an iPhone. In the long run mindshare = more profits!

    Experiences with cell phone companies are so varied, it's impossible to draw any conclusions approaching 1) or 2)... if anything, all you can come up with is "All cell phone companies suck."

    For every "AT&T's network sucks" you'll have a "Verizon's network sucks", and the same for customer service.

    As an example, my wife and I both defected from Verizon. I've been with AT&T for 6-7 years, and her since the iPhone 3G launched. She left Verizon because of several experiences with rude customer service, and spotty coverage.

  8. Re:Apple is an unamerican, anticompetitive company by troll8901 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This comment is rated Funny. I've reread this twice, but I still don't understand the joke. Can someone explain it to me please?