Slashdot Mirror


Papers Sealed In Class Action Against RIAA

NewYorkCountryLawyer writes "In Andersen v. Atlantic Recording, the Oregon class action brought by Tanya Anderson against the RIAA, MediaSentry, and others, the plaintiff's motion for class action certification has been sealed by the Court. Also, the Court conducted an 'in camera' conference with the defendants' attorneys — meaning the Judge met with the defendants' attorneys alone — in connection with a discovery motion, and the record of that conference has been sealed as well. The RIAA has made a motion to dismiss the class action; that has not been sealed. In case you're wondering what's going on here, so am I."

4 of 215 comments (clear)

  1. Link to Sealed Documents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Ray Beckerman (NYCL) has graciously hosted a fully illustrated PDF of the plaintiff's brief for class action certification (the documents in question) on his site. Now, I'm not a lawyer but that's got a whole lot of lengthy legalese that no human could understand.

  2. Re:Uh-oh! by NewYorkCountryLawyer · · Score: 5, Informative

    Ray Beckerman:

    In case you're wondering what's going on here, so am I."

    Oh fuck. It was bad enough when we had rank-and-file nerds asking for legal advice on slashdot.
    Now we have a 'house lawyer', so to speak, and he's asking for legal information on slashdot.
    The apocalypse is upon us! Run for the hills!*
    IANAL. Even if I were a lawyer, I'd not be YOUR lawyer. This is not legal advice. By reading this footnote, you are agreeing to not hold Red Flayer liable for any damages sustained while running for the hills. For that matter, please walk, don't run -- and make sure to look both ways before crossing the street.

    Good post, Red_Flayer. But I thought you guys could help me out and explain to me what's going on; I've only been working in the litigation field for 35 years, so I'm kind of new at this.

    In Soviet Russia....... oh wait, maybe we are in Soviet Russia.

    --
    Ray Beckerman +5 Insightful
  3. Re:Sealed? by BlueKitties · · Score: 5, Informative

    The first google search result for "sealed court case duration". [url]http://www.leg.state.nv.us/CourtRules/SCR_RGSRCR.html[/url] - " (c) Sealing of entire court file prohibited. Under no circumstances shall the court seal an entire court file. An order entered under these rules must, at a minimum, require that the following information is available for public viewing on court indices: (i) the case number(s) or docket code(s) or number(s); (ii) the date that the action was commenced; (iii) the names of the parties, counsel of record, and the assigned judge; (iv) the notation âoecase sealedâ; (v) the case type and cause(s) of action, which may be obtained from the Civil Cover Sheet; (vi) the order to seal and written findings supporting the order; and (vii) the identity of the party or other person who filed the motion to seal. 6. Scope and duration of order. If the court enters an order sealing or redacting a court record, the court shall use the least restrictive means and duration."

    --
    "Sorrow is better than laughter, for by sadness of face the heart is made glad." [Ecclesiastes 7:3]
  4. Noerr-Pennington doctrine by vivaelamor · · Score: 5, Informative

    From the linked pdf on NYCL's blog, it appears that the reasons cited for dismissing the case amount to a twisted interpretation of the Noerr Pennington doctrine roughly translated to:

    1. IP addresses are fair game for probable cause because a previous case involving DirecTV successfully used the Noerr Pennington directive to challenge class action against people supposedly infringing on their signals by buying smart card readers.

    2. Media Sentry not holding state investigative licenses is irrelevant because the information they gathered was publicly available.

    3. That allegations of the impropriety of accessing publicly shared folders has no basis in law.

    4. That any objection to the numerous 'Doe suites filed is countered by the successfulness of such proceedings. Also that such proceedings are not against the law.

    5. That the case against Ms Andersen herself was not "objectively baseless" despite failure to link Ms Andersen to the accused infringing Kazaa user name due to flaws in the investigative process.

    - IANAL

    Still, pretty weak arguments imho. Certainly shouldn't be enough to dismiss the case.

    As to the whole sealed shenanigans.. I guess we have to wait and see.