Twitter Considered Harmful To Swine-Flu Panic
judgecorp writes "Twitter is being criticized for spreading panic about swine flu. This is not just knee-jerk Luddism 2.0: it's argued that Twitter's structure encourages ill-informed repetition, with little room for context, while older Web media use their power for good — for instance Google's Flu Trends page (which we discussed last winter), and the introduction of a Google swine flu map." On a related note, reader NewtonsLaw suggests that it might be a good idea, epidemiologically speaking, to catch the flu now vs. later.
http://xkcd.com/574/
I'm not sure if that's funny, ironic, satiristic, scary or just reality, but, you've GOT to wonder...
http://www.bistolas.net
Just lick a kid with autism and you will be safe!
might be a good idea, epidemiologically speaking, to catch the flu now vs. later.
That's silly: why would the solution to eradicating a disease be catching it when it's already out there?
A better solution would be to treat the causes of the disease in the first place. In this case, H1N1 is a variant of the Spanish flu. Spain, Mexico? see a pattern? Of course, the solution is to ban Spanish and classical guitar worldwide.
"A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
People using twitter, or people blaming twitter. What's the word I'm looking for?
crap
Can someone please tell me why Fox News is always singled out on Slashdot? Is CNN and MSNBC any better? If so, explain.
Life is not for the lazy.
I'm not a part of a conspiracy or the Illuminati
That's just what you want me to believe. Anyway, what's a newspaper?
I've died from it twice so far. It really is a bad way to go.
Why all the xkcd related posts lately?
Where do you think slashdot editors get their news?
However, you can get revenge that way.