Slashdot Mirror


Senator Arlen Specter Becomes a Democrat

Akido37 was one of many readers letting us know that US Sen. Arlen Specter has changed parties to become a Democrat. This gives the Democrats 59 seats in the Senate, and 60 if and when Al Franken gets seated from Minnesota. However, Specter said in his announcement that he will not be an automatic 60th vote for breaking Republican filibusters. While the senator's move seems to have surprised many Republicans, it is understandable to moderate Republican Sen. Olympia Snowe of Maine, who said, "You haven't certainly heard warm encouraging words of how they [Republicans] view moderates. Either you are with us or against us." Specter noted that in his home state of Pennsylvania, 200,000 formerly Republican voters switched party allegiance last year.

12 of 1,124 comments (clear)

  1. Wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...Specter was a Republican to begin with?

  2. Re:Ugh... by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 5, Funny

    I find the principle of political parties disgusting and cowardly.

    If you vote for the party, you deserve to get raped by your representative.

    He was elected as Arlen Specter, and he's the same Arlen Specter he was last week. If you voted for him solely because of the R next to his name, you don't deserve a vote at all.

  3. Re:Fucking Democrat fags. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    tl;dr

  4. Re:Shift in dynamics by realnrh · · Score: 5, Funny

    As said by the estimable Jon Stewart, "I think they're confusing tyranny with losing." It makes them look unhinged.

    --
    Long? What do you mean the signature at the bottom of every comment I post on Slashdot is too lo
  5. Re:Hahaha, good one. by Gizzmonic · · Score: 3, Funny

    The Repubs just want it to fail in a manor that wakes people up so it doesn't happen again.

    Like, a country manor outside of Derbyshire? That's a nice play for anything, even failure! It's a bed and breakfast as well.

    --
    (-1, Raw and Uncut is the only way to read)
  6. Re:And.... by immcintosh · · Score: 1, Funny

    This is ENGLAND we're talking about here. You honestly expected them to be on good terms with dental care?

  7. Re:Hahaha, good one. by spun · · Score: 1, Funny

    See, this is your problem. You project your own inadequacies onto the rest of the world. Most of us work not because we have to, but because we are good people who want to contribute. Thankfully, most people are not lazy, selfish assholes.

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
  8. Re:And.... by Dragonslicer · · Score: 5, Funny

    The correct term is universal health bureaucracy, there is no care involved.

    Yeah, why would anyone want Universal Health Bureaucracy when our current system of Private Health Bureaucracy works so well

  9. What do you get combine a Republicand & a Demo by Propaganda13 · · Score: 3, Funny

    You get someone who never forgets he's an ass.

  10. Re:Hahaha, good one. by auld_wyrm · · Score: 2, Funny

    If the US pulled out of Iraq...

    You do know that's not really an effective form of contraception.

  11. nit pick by Foobar+of+Borg · · Score: 4, Funny

    before the Unitarian Executive theory

    Unitary Executive, not Unitarian! If Bush were a Unitarian executive, he would be far more open minded ^_^.

  12. Re:Fucking Democrat fags. by Ihlosi · · Score: 2, Funny

    For twelve years, you have been asking: Who is John Galt?

    Where's the equivalent of the RIAA for books? I want to report a violation. Can't have any parasites or thieves steal an honest womans hard work like that.