Slashdot Mirror


Iranians Outwit Censors With Falun Gong Software

Hugh Pickens writes "The NY Times reports that since last year more than 400,000 Iranians began surfing the uncensored Web using software created for the Falun Gong, a spiritual movement that has been suppressed by the Chinese government since 1999. More than 20 countries now use increasingly sophisticated blocking and filtering systems for Internet content, according to Reporters Without Borders, including Iran, China, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and Syria. The creators of the software seized upon by Iranians are members of the Global Internet Freedom Consortium, based largely in the United States and closely affiliated with Falun Gong. Interestingly enough, the United States government and the Voice of America have financed some of the circumvention technology efforts, and a coalition is organizing to push for more Congressional financing of anti-filtering efforts, bringing together dissidents of Vietnam, Iran, the Uighur minority of China, Tibet, Myanmar, Cuba, Cambodia, Laos, as well as the Falun Gong, to lobby Congress for the financing. 'What is our leverage toward a country like Iran? Very little,' said Michael Horowitz, a fellow at the Hudson Institute. 'Suppose we have the capacity to make it possible for the president of the United States at will to communicate with hundreds of thousands of Iranians at no risk or limited risk? It just changes the world.'"

8 of 171 comments (clear)

  1. What's old world is new world again by unlametheweak · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Hopefully the citizens of Britain and Australia and Germany can get a hold of this software so that they can use the Internet without government censorship impeding them.

  2. The markets are effective at this sort of thing by azgard · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Look at the military industry for example. There is a large market for guns, shells and missiles on one side, and also large market for bulletproof vests, armour and missile defense on the other side.

    This is a similar situation. Especially the makers of internet filtering software, such as Cisco, should take note of this emerging market opportunity.

    So, we should really keep the markets do their own thing, and the economy will grow and prosper.

  3. Why the surprise over Voice of America Support? by dorzak · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Voice of America started as a radio network for broadcasting news that shows a different point of view from that by censors in the old Soviet Bloc.

    This just seems a continuation of the same mission.

  4. Cyber attack? by wiredog · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Interestingly enough, the United States government and the Voice of America have financed some of the circumvention technology efforts,

    Would that count as a cyber attack on Iran or China?

  5. Left hand, meet right hand by JimMcc · · Score: 5, Insightful

    First, I'll state that I support this, worldwide.

    That said, I find it a bit whacked that on one hand we have part of our government demanding filtering and selective blocking of websites in public locations and schools. While at the same time a different part of our government is supporting and funding software to bypass filtering and blocking.

    Maybe we should drop the Politically Correct filtering efforts and quit wasting everybody's money. After all, isn't that what our government seems to be saying to other countries? Or is it just our country and our allies that are allowed to filter? Come on USA, get your story straight.

    1. Re:Left hand, meet right hand by Xtravar · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It makes perfect sense.

      We blow up foreign infrastructure only to rebuild it.

      We give tax breaks while simultaneously starting new spending programs.

      We fight poppy growers, who fund terrorism, while simultaneously sustaining an artificially expensive black market for drugs. In a sense, we're both funding and fighting terrorism.

      So there's absolutely nothing inconsistent about our behavior here.

      --
      Buckle your ROFL belt, we're in for some LOLs.
  6. Re:As the son of an Iranian refugee by quantax · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Not to defend the current theocrats, but you do realize Shah was a dictator and already "politically regressed to a very dangerous stage" which is why the revolution happened. The current government is learning that that fever of the revolution has died and people just want to live their lives. The progress will be slow but I have confidence Iranians will increasingly reject the cultural neanderthals within their current government.

    --
    "What can a thoughtful man hope for mankind on Earth, given the experience of the past million years? Nothing." -Bokonon
  7. Radio free world by 0xdeadbeef · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's funny how certain kinds of people praise the defiance of authority like this but admonish those who defeat filters in school to access controversial information. They force their public schools and libraries to install buggy censorware which has been demonstrated time and time again to block legitimate but incorrectly categorized information.

    Heck, the Australian and German governments filter their entire countries, for ostentatious "think of the children" reasons, but all it takes is a flip of a switch for it to go political. Neither country historically has much of a problem with certain kinds of political censorship.

    How long ago was it that we had Republicans telling us to watch what we say?

    We need a pan-national dedication to transparency and the free flow of information. The people who scream about Iranian and Chinese injustice the loudest are also some of the worst censors at home. The free world won't be until we hold our own people accountable.